World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
14986
World Ranking
3991
National Ranking
194

Albert Kok publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert Kok sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 158 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Albert Kok D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert Kok sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Albert Kok is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Neuroscience, with a specialization in Cognitive Neuroscience. The main topics addressed in their work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, and Neural Dynamics and Brain Function.

Their recent publications include two papers: "Cognitive control, motivation and fatigue: A cognitive neuroscience perspective" published in 2022 in the journal Brain and Cognition, and "Will Neuroscience Make Philosophy of Mind Superfluous?" published in 2024 in the SSRN Electronic Journal.

  • Brain and Cognition
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

  • Cognitive control, motivation and fatigue: A cognitive neuroscience perspective (2022, Brain and Cognition)
  • Will Neuroscience Make Philosophy of Mind Superfluous? (2024, SSRN Electronic Journal)

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Best Publications

  • On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity

    Albert Kok

  • Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review

    John Polich;Albert Kok

  • Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task.

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Jos Blom;Guido P.H. Band

  • Event-related potential (erp) reflections of mental resources: a review and synthesis

    Albert Kok

  • Psychophysiological brain research.

    C.H.M. Brunia;A.W.K. Gaillard;A. Kok

  • ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task.

    Albert Kok;Jennifer R. Ramautar;Michiel B. De Ruiter;Guido P. H. Band

  • Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks☆

    Albert Kok

  • A computational account of altered error processing in older age: dopamine and the error-related negativity.

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Durk Talsma;Michael G. H. Coles;Michael G. H. Coles

  • Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated.

    J.R. Ramautar;A. Kok;K.R. Ridderinkhof;K.R. Ridderinkhof

  • Event-related potentials to conjunctions of spatial frequency and orientation as a function of stimulus parameters and response requirements.

    J.L. Kenemans;A. Kok;F.T.Y. Smulders

  • Varieties of inhibition : manifestations in cognition, event-related potentials and aging

    Albert Kok

  • Age-related changes in involuntary and voluntary attention as reflected in components of the event-related potential (ERP).

    Albert Kok

  • Age effects on response monitoring in a mental-rotation task.

    Guido P.H Band;Albert Kok

  • Influence of caffeine on information processing stages in well rested and fatigued subjects

    Monicque M. Lorist;Jan Snel;Albert Kok

  • INFLUENCE OF CAFFEINE ON SELECTIVE ATTENTION IN WELL-RESTED AND FATIGUED SUBJECTS

    Monicque M. Lorist;Jan Snel;Albert Kok;Gijsbertus Mulder

  • Effects of stop-signal modality on the N2/P3 complex elicited in the stop-signal paradigm

    J.R. Ramautar;A. Kok;K.R. Ridderinkhof;K.R. Ridderinkhof

  • Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition.

    Jennifer R. Ramautar;Heleen A. Slagter;Albert Kok;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;K. Richard Ridderinkhof

  • The temporal selectivity of additive factor effects on the reaction process revealed in ERP component latencies

    F.T.Y. Smulders;A. Kok;J.L. Kenemans;T.R. Bashore

  • Inhibitory inefficiency and failures of intention activation: Age-related decline in the control of saccadic eye movements.

    S. Nieuwenhuis;K.R. Ridderinkhof;R. de Jong;A. Kok

  • Auditory event-related potentials to deviant stimuli during drowsiness and stage 2 sleep

    Oscar Winter;Albert Kok;J.Leon Kenernans;Martin Elton

  • Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: Evidence from an antisaccade task

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

K. Richard Ridderinkhof
K. Richard Ridderinkhof University of Amsterdam
Fren T.Y. Smulders
Fren T.Y. Smulders Maastricht University
Durk Talsma
Durk Talsma Ghent University
Heleen A. Slagter
Heleen A. Slagter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Monicque M. Lorist
Monicque M. Lorist University of Groningen
Guido P. H. Band
Guido P. H. Band Leiden University
Dirk J. Heslenfeld
Dirk J. Heslenfeld Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
J. Leon Kenemans
J. Leon Kenemans Utrecht University
Michiel B. de Ruiter
Michiel B. de Ruiter Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Gijsbertus Mulder
Gijsbertus Mulder University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree in the USA offers flexibility and a range of affordable options, making it an attractive choice for students and working professionals alike. When exploring degree programs, cost is often a key consideration. Many universities offer high-quality, low-cost online degrees, especially in states like Missouri. For a comprehensive list, take a look at the cheapest psychology degrees in Missouri.

If you are located in North Carolina, you can find several affordable psychology degrees in North Carolina that may align with your budget and career goals. Students in New York City can also access a variety of most affordable psychology degree programs in New York City, ideal for those wanting to study in an urban environment.

New Jersey residents have strong options as well, with a list of affordable psychology degrees in New Jersey to consider. Graduates of these programs can explore diverse career pathways, including therapy, counseling, research, and organizational psychology. Choosing an affordable online program can reduce financial stress and provide the skills needed for a successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Albert Kok

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles