World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
7243
World Ranking
8211
National Ranking
370

Gijsbertus Mulder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gijsbertus Mulder sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gijsbertus Mulder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gijsbertus Mulder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gijsbertus Mulder was affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands during their academic career. Their work was associated primarily with this institution, where research activities were conducted and contributions to their field were made.

Although no records of specific publications, co-authors, or book publications are available, the scientist's main academic identity is known through this affiliation.

Information about main fields of study, subfields, or topics of research related to Gijsbertus Mulder has not been documented in the available data.

No detailed records of recent papers or frequent publication venues connected to the scientist have been found, nor are there awards that were recorded during their professional lifetime.

As the scientist is deceased, all references to their career and affiliations are presented in the past tense to reflect their completed work and contributions.

Best Publications

  • Mental fatigue and task control: planning and preparation.

    Monicque M. Lorist;Merel Klein;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Ritske De Jong

  • When syntax meets semantics

    Thomas C. Gunter;Laurie A. Stowe;Gijsbertus Mulder

  • Operator effort and the measurement of heart-rate variability

    Jans Aasman;Gijsbertus Mulder;Lambertus J. M. Mulder

  • Use of partial stimulus information in response processing.

    R. De Jong;M. Wierda;G. Mulder;L. J. Mulder

  • Localizing components of a complex task: sentence processing and working memory

    Laurie A. Stowe;Cees A. J. Broere;Anne M. J. Paans;Albertus A. Wijers

  • Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: an electrophysiological investigation.

    Sandra H. Vos;Sandra H. Vos;Thomas C. Gunter;Herman H.J. Kolk;Gijsbertus Mulder

  • Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow

    Henderikus G.O.M. Smid;Gijsbertus Mulder;Lambertus J.M. Mulder

  • BRAIN POTENTIALS DURING SELECTIVE ATTENTION, MEMORY-SEARCH, AND MENTAL ROTATION

    Albertus A. Wijers;Leun J. Otten;Steven Feenstra;Gijsbertus Mulder

  • Attention to color: an analysis of selection, controlled search, and motor activation, using event-related potentials.

    Albertus A. Wijers;Gijsbertus Mulder;Tsunetaka Okita;Lambertus J.M. Mulder

  • INFLUENCE OF CAFFEINE ON SELECTIVE ATTENTION IN WELL-RESTED AND FATIGUED SUBJECTS

    Monicque M. Lorist;Jan Snel;Albert Kok;Gijsbertus Mulder

  • Memory search and visual spatial attention: An event-related brain potential analysis

    T. Okita;A.A. Wijers;G. Mulder;L.J.M. Mulder

  • An ERP study of visual spatial attention and letter target detection for isoluminant and nonisoluminant stimuli

    Albertus A. Wijers;Jan J. Lange;Gijsbertus Mulder;Lambertus J. M. Mulder

  • An event-related brain potential correlate of visual short-term memory.

    Peter Klaver;Durk Talsma;Albertus A. Wijers;Hans-Jochen Heinze

  • Late positive components and stimulus evaluation time

    K.A. Brookhuis;G. Mulder;L.J.M. Mulder;A.B.M. Gloerich

  • Introducing a baroreflex model for studying cardiovascular effects of mental workload

    Arie M. Van Roon;Lambertus J.M. Mulder;Monika Althaus;Gijsbertus Mulder

  • An electrophysiological study of semantic processing in young and middle-aged academics.

    Thomas C. Gunter;Janet L. Jackson;Gijsbertus Mulder

  • Event‐Related Potentials During Memory Search and Selective Attention to Letter Size and Conjunctions of Letter Size and Color

    Albertus A. Wijers;Gijsbertus Mulder;Tsunetaka Okita;Lambertus J.M. Mulder

  • Neural Differentiation of Lexico-Syntactic Categories or Semantic Features? Event-Related Potential Evidence for Both

    Marion L. Kellenbach;Albertus A. Wijers;Marjolijn Hovius;Juul Mulder

  • Mediated Priming in the Lexical Decision Task: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials and Reaction Time

    Dorothee J Chwilla;Herman H.J Kolk;Gijsbertus Mulder

  • Color selection and location selection in ERPs : differences, similarities and 'neural specificity'

    Jan J Lange;Albertus A Wijers;Lambertus J.M Mulder;Gijsbertus Mulder

  • A psychophysiological study of the use of partial information in stimulus-response translation.

    Henderikus G. Smid;Gijsbertus Mulder;Lambertus J. Mulder;Gerrit J. Brands

Frequent Co-Authors

Albertus A. Wijers
Albertus A. Wijers University of Groningen
Monicque M. Lorist
Monicque M. Lorist University of Groningen
Thomas C. Gunter
Thomas C. Gunter Max Planck Society
Ruud B. Minderaa
Ruud B. Minderaa University of Groningen
Albert Kok
Albert Kok University of Amsterdam
Peter Klaver
Peter Klaver University of Zurich
Durk Talsma
Durk Talsma Ghent University
Herman H.J. Kolk
Herman H.J. Kolk Radboud University
Maurits W. van der Molen
Maurits W. van der Molen University of Amsterdam
Marta Kutas
Marta Kutas University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up a variety of educational and career options. These programs are designed for flexibility, helping students balance their studies with personal or professional commitments. As demand for mental health professionals grows nationwide, selecting the right degree program becomes increasingly important.

Prospective students should consider program value, curriculum, and location when making their decision. For those on the East Coast, exploring the most valuable online psychology degree programs ranking in Philadelphia is a great starting point. Meanwhile, the most valuable psychology programs in Arizona highlight top choices in the Southwest, while options in the Pacific are revealed in the most valuable psychology degrees in Hawaii. Additionally, students seeking value in the Southeast may look into the best value psychology degrees in Jacksonville.

Graduates with online psychology degrees can pursue various career pathways in clinical counseling, organizational psychology, social services, education, or research. Carefully comparing programs across regions will help students find the right fit for their goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Gijsbertus Mulder

Recently Published Articles