World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
5407
World Ranking
11311
National Ranking
154

Durk Talsma publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Durk Talsma sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 77 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Durk Talsma D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Durk Talsma sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration

    Durk Talsma;Durk Talsma;Daniel Senkowski;Salvador Soto-Faraco;Marty G. Woldorff

  • Selective Attention and Audiovisual Integration: Is Attending to Both Modalities a Prerequisite for Early Integration?

    Durk Talsma;Tracy J. Doty;Marty G. Woldorff

  • Selective Attention and Multisensory Integration: Multiple Phases of Effects on the Evoked Brain Activity

    Durk Talsma;Marty G. Woldorff

  • A computational account of altered error processing in older age: dopamine and the error-related negativity.

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Durk Talsma;Michael G. H. Coles;Michael G. H. Coles

  • Good times for multisensory integration: Effects of the precision of temporal synchrony as revealed by gamma-band oscillations

    Daniel Senkowski;Daniel Senkowski;Daniel Senkowski;Durk Talsma;Durk Talsma;Maren Grigutsch;Christoph S. Herrmann

  • Predictive coding and multisensory integration: an attentional account of the multisensory mind

    Durk Talsma

  • Early multisensory interactions affect the competition among multiple visual objects

    Erik Van der Burg;Durk Talsma;Christian N.L. Olivers;Clayton Hickey

  • A multisensory perspective of working memory

    Michel Quak;Raquel Elea London;Durk Talsma

  • An event-related brain potential correlate of visual short-term memory.

    Peter Klaver;Durk Talsma;Albertus A. Wijers;Hans-Jochen Heinze

  • Multisensory processing and oscillatory gamma responses: effects of spatial selective attention.

    Daniel Senkowski;Durk Talsma;Durk Talsma;Christoph S. Herrmann;Marty G. Woldorff

  • The pure electrophysiology of stopping

    Everlijne M. Bekker;J. Leon Kenemans;Marco R. Hoeksma;Durk Talsma;Durk Talsma

  • Grabbing attention without knowing : Automatic capture of attention by subliminal spatial cues

    Manon Mulckhuyse;Durk Talsma;Jan Theeuwes

  • Intermodal spatial attention differs between vision and audition: An event-related potential analysis

    D. Talsma;Albert Kok

  • The orienting of visuospatial attention: An event-related brain potential study

    Durk Talsma;Heleen A. Slagter;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Jasper Hage

  • Attentional capacity for processing concurrent stimuli is larger across sensory modalities than within a modality.

    Durk Talsma;Durk Talsma;Tracy J. Doty;Roy Strowd;Marty G. Woldorff

  • The Curious Incident of Attention in Multisensory Integration: Bottom-up vs. Top-down

    Emiliano Macaluso;Uta Noppeney;Durk Talsma;Tiziana Vercillo

  • Single-trial multisensory memories affect later auditory and visual object discrimination

    Antonia Thelen;Antonia Thelen;Durk Talsma;Micah M. Murray

  • Nonspatial intermodal selective attention is mediated by sensory brain areas: Evidence from event-related potentials

    Durk Talsma;Albert Kok

  • Subcortical, Modality-Specific Pathways Contribute to Multisensory Processing in Humans

    RL van den Brink;MX Cohen;E van der Burg;Durk Talsma

  • Intermodal attention affects the processing of the temporal alignment of audiovisual stimuli

    Durk Talsma;Daniel Senkowski;Marty G. Woldorff

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Theeuwes
Jan Theeuwes Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Albert Kok
Albert Kok University of Amsterdam
Dick Botteldooren
Dick Botteldooren Ghent University
Marty G. Woldorff
Marty G. Woldorff Duke University
Heleen A. Slagter
Heleen A. Slagter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Christian N. L. Olivers
Christian N. L. Olivers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Peter Klaver
Peter Klaver University of Zurich
Daniel Senkowski
Daniel Senkowski Charité - University Medicine Berlin
K. Richard Ridderinkhof
K. Richard Ridderinkhof University of Amsterdam
Tom Verguts
Tom Verguts Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Durk Talsma

Recently Published Articles