World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charanjit S. Rihal

Charanjit S. Rihal

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 125 3088 2881 1704 1567 820 59708

Charanjit S. Rihal publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charanjit S. Rihal between 1958 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charanjit S. Rihal published across 69 years, from 1958 to 2026, averaging 12.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 64 publications in 2021. 18 of the 862 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1958 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 64. Peak 64 publications in 2021. 1958: 1 publication 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 30 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 36 publications 2009: 37 publications 2010: 33 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 33 publications 2013: 39 publications 2014: 41 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 47 publications 2017: 40 publications 2018: 42 publications 2019: 51 publications 2020: 38 publications 2021: 64 publications 2022: 35 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
1958 2026

862 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charanjit S. Rihal: publications per year, 1958 to 2026
Year Publications
1958 1
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 3
1992 2
1993 2
1994 4
1995 5
1996 3
1997 6
1998 5
1999 12
2000 8
2001 13
2002 9
2003 8
2004 16
2005 13
2006 30
2007 33
2008 36
2009 37
2010 33
2011 34
2012 33
2013 39
2014 41
2015 41
2016 47
2017 40
2018 42
2019 51
2020 38
2021 64
2022 35
2023 34
2024 26
2025 17
2026 1
Total 862
Download as CSV

Charanjit S. Rihal publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charanjit S. Rihal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 801–820 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 820 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204 820
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Charanjit S. Rihal D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charanjit S. Rihal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 124–125 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 125 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256 125
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Charanjit S. Rihal is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has a focused research portfolio primarily in the field of Medicine, with a significant concentration in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their scholarly output includes 524 publications, with 290 specifically related to cardiology and cardiovascular topics.

Their research encompasses a range of subfields including Epidemiology, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Key areas of investigation are reflected in the main topics worked on, which cover Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management, Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair, Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies, and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments.

They have contributed to numerous recent papers, with notable examples as follows:

  • Effect of Genotype-Guided Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Selection vs Conventional Clopidogrel Therapy on Ischemic Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2020, JAMA
  • Thirty-Day Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement for Degenerated Mitral Bioprostheses (Valve-in-Valve), Failed Surgical Rings (Valve-in-Ring), and Native Valve With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification (Valve-in-Mitral Annular Calcification) in the United States, 2020, Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • One-Year Outcomes of Mitral Valve-in-Valve Using the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve, 2020, JAMA Cardiology
  • Effect of CYP2C19 Genotype on Ischemic Outcomes During Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Therapy, 2021, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • A Cardiac Computed Tomography-Based Score to Categorize Mitral Annular Calcification Severity and Predict Valve Embolization, 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

Charanjit S. Rihal's frequent co-authors include:

  • Mackram F. Eleid, with whom they have collaborated on 106 publications
  • Mayra Guerrero, with 75 joint publications
  • Mohamad Alkhouli, with 61 joint publications
  • Rajiv Gulati, with 28 joint publications
  • Jeremy J. Thaden, also with 28 joint publications

Their research is often published in leading cardiovascular journals and venues, with the most common publication outlets being:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology, with 32 publications
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, with 29 publications
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, with 21 publications
  • Journal of the American Heart Association, with 11 publications
  • Circulation, with 10 publications

Best Publications

  • Incidence and Prognostic Importance of Acute Renal Failure After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Charanjit S. Rihal;Stephen C. Textor;Diane E. Grill;Peter B. Berger

  • Apical ballooning syndrome (Tako-Tsubo or stress cardiomyopathy): A mimic of acute myocardial infarction

    Abhiram Prasad;Amir Lerman;Charanjit S. Rihal

  • Systematic Review: Transient Left Ventricular Apical Ballooning: A Syndrome That Mimics ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

    Kevin A. Bybee;Tomas Kara;Abhiram Prasad;Amir Lerman

  • International Expert Consensus Document on Takotsubo Syndrome (Part I): Clinical Characteristics, Diagnostic Criteria, and Pathophysiology

    Jelena Rima Ghadri;Ilan Shor Wittstein;Abhiram Prasad;Scott Sharkey

  • Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection

    Marysia S. Tweet;Sharonne N. Hayes;Sridevi R. Pitta;Robert D. Simari

  • The impact of renal insufficiency on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

    Patricia J.M Best;Ryan Lennon;Henry H Ting;Malcolm R Bell

  • Clinical characteristics and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame counts in women with transient left ventricular apical ballooning syndrome

    Kevin A Bybee;Abhiram Prasad;Greg W Barsness;Amir Lerman

  • 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care: Endorsed by the American Heart Assocation, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d’intervention

    Charanjit S. Rihal;Srihari S. Naidu;Michael M. Givertz;Wilson Y. Szeto

  • Four-year recurrence rate and prognosis of the apical ballooning syndrome.

    Ahmad A. Elesber;Abhiram Prasad;Ryan J. Lennon;R. Scott Wright

  • International Expert Consensus Document on Takotsubo Syndrome (Part II): Diagnostic Workup, Outcome, and Management

    Jelena Rima Ghadri;Ilan Shor Wittstein;Abhiram Prasad;Scott Sharkey

  • Systolic and diastolic dysfunction in patients with clinical diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy. Relation to symptoms and prognosis.

    C S Rihal;R A Nishimura;L K Hatle;K R Bailey

  • Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Revascularization Versus Conservative Therapy

    Marysia S. Tweet;Mackram F. Eleid;Patricia J.M. Best;Ryan J. Lennon

  • Cardiac Risk of Noncardiac Surgery Influence of Coronary Disease and Type of Surgery in 3368 Operations

    Kim A. Eagle;Charanjit S. Rihal;Mary C. Mickel;David R. Holmes

  • Bleeding, Blood Transfusion, and Increased Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Implications for Contemporary Practice

    Brendan J. Doyle;Charanjit S. Rihal;Dennis A. Gastineau;David R. Holmes

  • Contrast-induced kidney injury: Mechanisms, risk factors, and prevention

    Erdmann Seeliger;Mauricio Sendeski;Charanjit S. Rihal;Pontus B. Persson

  • Regional Systems of Care to Optimize Timeliness of Reperfusion Therapy for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The Mayo Clinic STEMI Protocol

    Henry H. Ting;Charanjit S. Rihal;Bernard J. Gersh;Luis H. Haro

  • Prevalence of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in the United States.

    Abhishek Deshmukh;Gagan Kumar;Sadip Pant;Charanjit Rihal

  • Clinical outcomes and stent thrombosis following off-label use of drug-eluting stents.

    Htut K. Win;Angel E. Caldera;Kelly Maresh;John Lopez

  • Trends in outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions: a 25-year experience from the Mayo Clinic.

    Abhiram Prasad;Charanjit S. Rihal;Ryan J. Lennon;Heather J. Wiste

  • Paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Edwards sapien valve in the PARTNER trial: characterizing patients and impact on outcomes

    Susheel Kodali;Philippe Pibarot;Pamela S. Douglas;Mathew Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. Holmes
David R. Holmes Mayo Clinic
Ryan J. Lennon
Ryan J. Lennon Mayo Clinic
Amir Lerman
Amir Lerman Mayo Clinic
Abhiram Prasad
Abhiram Prasad Mayo Clinic
Bernard J. Gersh
Bernard J. Gersh Mayo Clinic
Guy S. Reeder
Guy S. Reeder Mayo Clinic
Lilach O. Lerman
Lilach O. Lerman Mayo Clinic
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Donald J. Hagler
Donald J. Hagler Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a medical career in the USA, there are many online degree options and alternative pathways to healthcare roles beyond the traditional MD. These programs offer flexibility and affordability for those who want to work in healthcare without attending medical school.

For those interested in pharmaceuticals, pursuing pharmacy school online accredited programs can lead to high-demand careers in pharmacy practice, research, and drug safety. If you’re interested in the digital aspect of healthcare, an online bachelor's in health information management opens doors to roles in healthcare data, compliance, and management of electronic health records.

Medical administration is another growing field. Obtaining a medical billing and coding certification online can qualify you for administrative jobs that are essential to healthcare operations. Alternatively, you could explore patient care by looking into the cheapest fnp programs, becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner with greater clinical responsibilities and autonomy.

These programs provide flexible, cost-effective ways to impact patient care and make a difference in the healthcare system from a variety of roles.

Best Scientists Citing Charanjit S. Rihal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles