World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
52
Citations
14444
World Ranking
3393
National Ranking
96

Paul Opdam publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Opdam sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 120 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Paul Opdam D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Opdam sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Biodiversity
  • Social science

His primary areas of investigation include Ecology, Habitat, Landscape ecology, Metapopulation and Landscape planning. Many of his studies on Ecology apply to Biological dispersal as well. His work is dedicated to discovering how Habitat, Biodiversity are connected with Species distribution and Land use and other disciplines.

In his work, Spatial planning is strongly intertwined with Landscape assessment, which is a subfield of Landscape ecology. His work in Metapopulation covers topics such as Fragmentation which are related to areas like Local extinction. His Landscape planning research is within the category of Environmental resource management.

His most cited work include:

  • Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation (686 citations)
  • Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan‐European study (481 citations)
  • Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development (399 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Environmental resource management, Ecology, Habitat, Landscape ecology and Landscape planning. His Environmental resource management research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Sustainability, Ecosystem services, Environmental planning and Sustainable development. His Ecology research incorporates themes from Biological dispersal and Metapopulation.

Paul Opdam focuses mostly in the field of Metapopulation, narrowing it down to topics relating to Spatial ecology and, in certain cases, Spatial planning. His Habitat study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Ecological network, Fragmentation and Species richness. His work in the fields of Ecotope overlaps with other areas such as Field.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Environmental resource management (42.48%)
  • Ecology (33.63%)
  • Habitat (22.12%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2020)?

  • Sustainability (17.70%)
  • Environmental resource management (42.48%)
  • Ecosystem services (13.27%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Paul Opdam focuses on Sustainability, Environmental resource management, Ecosystem services, Knowledge management and Sustainable development. His work on Sustainability science as part of general Sustainability study is frequently linked to Context, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. His Environmental resource management study combines topics in areas such as Local community, Bird conservation and Birds Directive.

Ecosystem services is a subfield of Ecology that Paul Opdam investigates. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Metapopulation, Extinction and Normative. His studies in Sustainable development integrate themes in fields like Landscape ecology, Resource management and Process management.

Between 2013 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: a Synthesis of Critique and Counter-Arguments (338 citations)
  • Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: requirements, approaches, and impacts (112 citations)
  • Landscape Approaches : A State-of-the-Art Review (73 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Biodiversity
  • Sustainability

His scientific interests lie mostly in Ecosystem services, Sustainability, Environmental resource management, Sustainable development and Context. Ecosystem services is the subject of his research, which falls under Ecology. In the subject of general Ecology, his work in Ecological network, Protected area, Habitat and Anthropocentrism is often linked to Supply and demand, thereby combining diverse domains of study.

The various areas that Paul Opdam examines in his Sustainability study include Landscape planning, Interconnectedness and Information Age. His Environmental resource management study incorporates themes from Environmental studies, Discipline and Environmental planning. His work deals with themes such as Resource management and Process management, which intersect with Sustainable development.

Best Publications

  • Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation

    Paul Opdam;Dirk Wascher

  • Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan‐European study

    R. Billeter;J. Liira;D. Bailey;R.J.F. Bugter

  • Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: a Synthesis of Critique and Counter-Arguments

    Matthias Schröter;Emma H. van der Zanden;Alexander P.E. van Oudenhoven;Roy P. Remme

  • Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development

    Jolande W. Termorshuizen;Paul Opdam

  • Ecological networks: a spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes

    Paul Opdam;Eveliene Steingröver;Sabine van Rooij

  • Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm

    Joan Iverson Nassauer;Paul Opdam

  • Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies

    Paul Opdam

  • Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices.

    C. C. Vos;J. Verboom;P. F. M. Opdam;C. J. F. Ter Braak

  • Effects of patch size, isolation and regional abundance on forest bird communities.

    D. van Dorp;P. F. M. Opdam

  • Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology

    Paul Opdam;Ruud Foppen;Claire Vos

  • Adapting landscapes to climate change: examples of climate-proof ecosystem networks and priority adaptation zones

    Claire C. Vos;Pam Berry;Paul Opdam;Hans Baveco

  • Landscape cohesion: an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity

    Paul Opdam;Jana Verboom;Rogier Pouwels

  • European Nuthatch Metapopulations in a Fragmented Agricultural Landscape

    Jana Verboom;Alex Schotman;Paul Opdam;Johan A. J. Metz

  • Introducing the key patch approach for habitat networks with persistent populations: an example for marshland birds

    Jana Verboom;Ruud Foppen;Paul Chardon;Paul Opdam

  • Bird communities in small woods in an agricultural landscape: Effects of area and isolation

    P. Opdam;G. Rijsdijk;F. Hustings

  • Landscape Approaches : A State-of-the-Art Review

    Bas Arts;Marleen Buizer;Lummina Horlings;Verina Ingram

  • The ecological effectiveness of protected areas: the United Kingdom

    Kevin J. Gaston;Kevin Charman;Sarah F. Jackson;Paul R. Armsworth

  • Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: requirements, approaches, and impacts

    Christian Albert;Christian Albert;James Aronson;James Aronson;Christine Fürst;Paul Opdam

  • Population responses to landscape fragmentation

    Paul Opdam;Rob van Apeldoorn;Alex Schotman;Jan Kalkhoven

  • Designing a Coherent Ecological Network for Large Mammals in Northwestern Europe

    Geert Groot Bruinderink;Theo Van Der Sluis;Dennis Lammertsma;Paul Opdam

  • Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment

    Claire C. Vos;Paul Opdam

Frequent Co-Authors

Marinus J. M. Smulders
Marinus J. M. Smulders Wageningen University & Research
Michiel F. WallisDeVries
Michiel F. WallisDeVries Wageningen University & Research
Catrien J.A.M. Termeer
Catrien J.A.M. Termeer Wageningen University & Research
Tim Diekötter
Tim Diekötter Kiel University
Art Dewulf
Art Dewulf Wageningen University & Research
Karin Johst
Karin Johst Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Frederik Hendrickx
Frederik Hendrickx Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences
Martin Drechsler
Martin Drechsler Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Cees Leeuwis
Cees Leeuwis Wageningen University & Research
Peter H. Verburg
Peter H. Verburg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a variety of online degree options and career paths. Many students seek out the most affordable online master's in education to enhance their teaching skills with a focus on environmental science. This pathway is especially valuable for those interested in education and outreach roles.

Another option is pursuing a library science degree. Specializing in digital curation or environmental collections provides exciting opportunities in research institutions, museums, and public libraries.

Graduates interested in public health or communication might consider the asha approved slp programs. These programs ensure you meet critical clinical standards for speech-language pathology while allowing you to explore connections between environmental changes and human communication.

Don't have a relevant undergraduate background? SLP bridge programs offer a flexible way to move into this rewarding career, even from an ecology or natural sciences perspective.

Each of these pathways provides versatile skills that can be applied across research, education, and advocacy roles within Ecology and Evolution fields.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Opdam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles