World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elizabeth A. Carlson

Elizabeth A. Carlson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5787 5379 3136 2844 67 18977

Elizabeth A. Carlson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth A. Carlson between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth A. Carlson published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2017. 6 of the 74 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2017. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1991 2025

74 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth A. Carlson: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 2
1994 1
1995 3
1996 1
1997 4
1998 1
1999 4
2000 2
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 5
2006 2
2007 0
2008 2
2009 1
2010 1
2011 3
2012 3
2013 2
2014 4
2015 1
2016 3
2017 6
2018 2
2019 3
2020 3
2021 3
2022 1
2023 1
2024 3
2025 3
Total 74
Download as CSV

Elizabeth A. Carlson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Carlson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 67 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 67
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Elizabeth A. Carlson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Carlson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Elizabeth A. Carlson is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and has a research profile concentrated in psychology and social sciences. Their research integrates various subfields, including clinical psychology, social psychology, safety research, education, and general health professions.

The scientist's work addresses topics such as child abuse and trauma, child welfare and adoption, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, migration, health and trauma, attachment and relationship dynamics, family and disability support research, as well as stress responses and cortisol. These themes demonstrate a focus on developmental and psychosocial aspects within vulnerable populations.

Among their recent scholarly contributions are publications such as:

  • Life stress and cortisol reactivity: An exploratory analysis of the effects of stress exposure across life on HPA-axis functioning (2020) published in Development and Psychopathology
  • Childhood abuse and neglect and self-reported symptoms of psychopathology through midlife (2021) in Developmental Psychology
  • Childcare providers' views of challenging child behaviors, suspension, and expulsion: A qualitative analysis (2022) in Infant Mental Health Journal
  • Secure attachment in infancy predicts context-dependent emotion expression in middle childhood (2021) in Emotion
  • Comparison of glucose concentrations in canine whole blood, plasma, and serum measured with a veterinary point-of-care glucometer (2021) in Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

Frequent co-authors in Elizabeth A. Carlson's research collaborations include Glenn I. Roisman, Marissa D. Nivison, Sophia W. Magro, Michelle M. Englund, and Jeffry A. Simpson. These partnerships have contributed to multiple publications, indicating ongoing collaborative work.

Their publications often appear in key journals such as Development and Psychopathology, Orthopaedic Nursing, Developmental Psychology, Infant Mental Health Journal, and Early Childhood Education Journal.

Elizabeth A. Carlson's research contributions reflect a multidisciplinary approach, combining clinical psychology with an emphasis on social contexts and developmental trajectories influenced by adverse experiences and family dynamics.

Best Publications

  • The Development of the Person: The Minnesota Study of Risk and Adaptation from Birth to Adulthood

    L. A. Sroufe;B. Egeland;E. A. Carlson;W. A. Collins

  • Resilience as process

    Byron R. Egeland;Elizabeth Carlson;L. Alan Sroufe

  • Development and the fragmented self: Longitudinal study of dissociative symptomatology in a nonclinical sample

    John R. Ogawa;L. Alan Sroufe;Nancy S. Weinfield;Elizabeth A. Carlson

  • Implications of attachment theory for developmental psychopathology

    L. Alan Sroufe;Elizabeth A. Carlson;Alissa K. Levy;Byron Egeland

  • A prospective longitudinal study of attachment disorganization/disorientation

    E. A. Carlson

  • Attachment in institutionalized and community children in Romania

    Charles H. Zeanah;Anna T. Smyke;Sebastian F. Koga;Elizabeth Carlson

  • Enhancing Attachment Organization Among Maltreated Children: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

    Kristin Bernard;Mary Dozier;Johanna Bick;Erin Lewis-Morrarty

  • The nature of individual differences in infant–caregiver attachment.

    Nancy S. Weinfield;L. Alan Sroufe;Byron Egeland;Elizabeth A. Carlson

  • Associations among adult attachment representations, maternal sensitivity, and infant-mother attachment in a sample of adolescent mothers

    Mary J. Ward;Elizabeth A. Carlson

  • Distinguishing the early-onset/persistent and adolescence-onset antisocial behavior types: from birth to 16 years.

    Benjamin Aguilar;L. Alan Sroufe;Byron Egeland;Elizabeth Carlson

  • A Developmental Investigation of Inattentiveness and Hyperactivity

    Elizabeth A. Carlson;Deborah Jacobvitz;L. Alan Sroufe

  • A prospective investigation of the development of borderline personality symptoms.

    Elizabeth A. Carlson;Byron Egeland;L. Alan Sroufe

  • A prospective, longitudinal study of the correlates and consequences of early grade retention ☆

    Shane Jimerson;Elizabeth A Carlson;Monique Rotert;Byron Egeland

  • Contribution of attachment theory to developmental psychopathology.

    Elizabeth A. Carlson;L. Alan Sroufe

  • The impact of foster care on development.

    Catherine R. Lawrence;Elizabeth A. Carlson;Byron Egeland

  • Disorganized attachment in infancy : a review of the phenomenon and its implications for clinicians and policy-makers

    Pehr Granqvist;L. Alan Sroufe;Mary Dozier;Erik Hesse

  • A prospective study of child maltreatment and self-injurious behavior in a community sample

    Tuppett M. Yates;Elizabeth A. Carlson;Byron Egeland

  • Individuals in relationships: Development from infancy through adolescence.

    L. Alan Sroufe;Elizabeth Carlson;Shmuel Shulman

  • The Construction of Experience: A Longitudinal Study of Representation and Behavior

    Elizabeth A. Carlson;L. Alan sroufe;Byron Egeland

  • Individual differences in infant-caregiver attachment: Conceptual and empirical aspects of security.

    Nancy S. Weinfield;L. Alan Sroufe;Byron Egeland;Elizabeth Carlson

Frequent Co-Authors

L. Alan Sroufe
L. Alan Sroufe University of Minnesota
Byron Egeland
Byron Egeland University of Minnesota
Glenn I. Roisman
Glenn I. Roisman University of Minnesota
Jeffry A. Simpson
Jeffry A. Simpson University of Minnesota
Mary Dozier
Mary Dozier University of Delaware
Dante Cicchetti
Dante Cicchetti University of Minnesota
Gregory E. Miller
Gregory E. Miller Northwestern University
W. Andrew Collins
W. Andrew Collins University of Minnesota
Megan R. Gunnar
Megan R. Gunnar University of Minnesota
Kristin Bernard
Kristin Bernard Stony Brook University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a range of online degree options and professional pathways. Many students are interested in becoming licensed therapists, particularly in fields like marriage and family therapy (MFT). Each state and city often has unique educational and certification requirements for aspiring therapists.

For example, if you are interested in working in California, you should review the San Francisco mft education requirements and the San Jose mft education requirements to ensure your program meets local standards. Those considering a career in Southern California can learn more by reading about how to become an mft in Santa Ana. Meanwhile, students outside California may look into Scottsdale mft certification requirements for insight into opportunities in Arizona.

Online psychology degrees can make it easier to balance studies with other commitments. However, it's important to verify that your chosen online program fulfills the specific clinical and academic prerequisites in the region where you plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth A. Carlson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles