World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
21764
World Ranking
5783
National Ranking
3133

Rose T. Zacks publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rose T. Zacks sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 67 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Rose T. Zacks D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rose T. Zacks sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rose T. Zacks is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. The academic profile reflects an active engagement in research related to this institution.

The available data indicates no specific publications, co-authors, or primary fields of study are listed for this researcher. As a result, a detailed overview of their research topics, thematic focus, and publication record cannot be provided at this time.

No records of awards or honors are associated with Rose T. Zacks in the current dataset.

Without detailed information on research papers, frequent publication venues, or book publications, it is not possible to elaborate further on Rose T. Zacks' scientific contributions or domain specificity.

Best Publications

  • Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View

    Lynn Hasher;Rose T. Zacks

  • Automatic and effortful processes in memory.

    Lynn Hasher;Rose T. Zacks

  • Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence.

    Lynn Hasher;Rose T. Zacks

  • Age and inhibition

    Lynn Hasher;Ellen R. Stoltzfus;Rose T. Zacks;Bart Rypma

  • Inhibitory Mechanisms and the Control of Attention

    Lynn Hasher;Cindy Lustig;Rose Zacks

  • Age and reading: the impact of distraction.

    S. Lisa Connelly;Lynn Hasher;Rose T. Zacks

  • Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view"

    Cindy Lustig;Lynn Hasher;Rose T. Zacks

  • Studies of directed forgetting in older adults.

    Rose T. Zacks;Gabriel Radvansky;Lynn Hasher

  • Stroop Interference, Practice, and Aging

    Douglas J. Davidson;Rose T. Zacks;Carrick C. Williams

  • Inhibitory attentional mechanisms and aging.

    Kane Mj;Hasher L;Stoltzfus Er;Zacks Rt

  • Cognitive Gerontology and Attentional Inhibition: A Reply to Burke and McDowd

    Rose Zacks;Lynn Hasher

  • Age-related differences in cognition: The role of distraction control.

    Emily S. Darowski;Elizabeth Helder;Rose T. Zacks;Lynn Hasher

  • Aging, distraction, and the benefits of predictable location.

    Michelle C. Carlson;Lynn Hasher;S. Lisa Connelly;Rose T. Zacks

  • Event Segmentation Ability Uniquely Predicts Event Memory

    Jesse Q. Sargent;Jeffrey M. Zacks;David Z. Hambrick;Rose T. Zacks

  • Younger and Older Adults' “Good-Enough” Interpretations of Garden-Path Sentences

    Kiel Christianson;Carrick C. Williams;Rose T. Zacks;Fernanda Ferreira

  • Framing Effects in Younger and Older Adults

    Sunghan Kim;David Goldstein;Lynn Hasher;Rose T. Zacks

  • Investigations of Inhibition and Interference in Younger and Older Adults

    Ellen R. Stoltzfus;Lynn Hasher;Rose T. Zacks;Mauri S. Ulivi

  • Aging and a benefit of distractibility.

    Sunghan Kim;Lynn Hasher;Rose T. Zacks

  • Working Memory and Aging: Current Status of the Inhibitory View

    Ellen R. Stoltzfus;Lynn Hasher;Rose T. Zacks

  • Mental models and the fan effect.

    Gabriel A. Radvansky;Rose T. Zacks

  • Working Memory and Human Cognition

    John T. E. Richardson;Randall W. Engle;Lynn Hasher;Robert H. Logie

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynn Hasher
Lynn Hasher University of Toronto
Gabriel A. Radvansky
Gabriel A. Radvansky University of Notre Dame
John M. Henderson
John M. Henderson University of California, Davis
David Z. Hambrick
David Z. Hambrick Michigan State University
John T. E. Richardson
John T. E. Richardson The Open University
Randall W. Engle
Randall W. Engle Georgia Institute of Technology
Mary A. Luszcz
Mary A. Luszcz Flinders University
Janet Bryan
Janet Bryan University of South Australia
Michael J. Kane
Michael J. Kane University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Scott M. Hofer
Scott M. Hofer University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a psychology degree in the USA, many students explore how online programs can open doors to careers like Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). However, counseling licensure requirements differ notably across states. Understanding these variations is crucial for aligning your education with your career goals.

For example, the California lpc licensure requirements place emphasis on specific supervised experience hours and coursework covering multicultural counseling. Meanwhile, the lpc license requirements in Colorado focus on graduate-level clinical content and a national exam. Each state sets unique standards for education, exams, and post-degree experience, all of which can impact your timeline and preparation.

States such as Connecticut have their own expectations for LPCs. Understanding the lpc license requirements in Connecticut can help you plan for internships and supervised practice, which are required before independent work. Similarly, students interested in the East Coast can review how to get an lpc license in Delaware for a detailed step-by-step process tailored to that state.

By matching your online psychology degree and practicum experiences with your target state's regulations, you’ll be better prepared for a seamless transition from student to licensed professional.

Best Scientists Citing Rose T. Zacks

Recently Published Articles