World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
66
Citations
13352
World Ranking
2364
National Ranking
1177

Danny A. Grant publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danny A. Grant sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 174 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Danny A. Grant D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danny A. Grant sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Haptic technology
  • Electrical engineering

Danny A. Grant focuses on Haptic technology, Actuator, Signal, Artificial intelligence and Computer vision. His Haptic technology study introduces a deeper knowledge of Simulation. His work carried out in the field of Actuator brings together such families of science as Computer graphics, Coefficient of friction and Deformation.

His work in Signal tackles topics such as Input device which are related to areas like Conductor, Planar and User intent. His Cursor study in the realm of Artificial intelligence connects with subjects such as Property, Information exchange and Robotics. In general Computer vision study, his work on Object and Scrolling often relates to the realm of Surface and Computer based, thereby connecting several areas of interest.

His most cited work include:

  • System and method for controlling haptic devices having multiple operational modes (542 citations)
  • Haptic interfaces and devices (450 citations)
  • Haptic feedback using rotary harmonic moving mass (399 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Danny A. Grant mainly focuses on Haptic technology, Signal, Actuator, Output device and Simulation. His Haptic technology study contributes to a more complete understanding of Artificial intelligence. Danny A. Grant focuses mostly in the field of Signal, narrowing it down to topics relating to Electronic engineering and, in certain cases, Piezoelectricity.

His Actuator study combines topics in areas such as Texture, Control theory and Mobile device. His Output device research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Augmented reality, Wearable computer, Sense and Display device. Danny A. Grant incorporates Simulation and Controller in his studies.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Haptic technology (89.67%)
  • Signal (51.24%)
  • Actuator (39.67%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2020)?

  • Haptic technology (89.67%)
  • Signal (51.24%)
  • Output device (29.75%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Haptic technology, Signal, Output device, Actuator and Simulation. Haptic technology is a subfield of Artificial intelligence that he tackles. In the subject of general Signal, his work in Sampling is often linked to Process, Illusion and User device, thereby combining diverse domains of study.

His research in Output device intersects with topics in Mixed reality, Wearable computer and Sense. The Actuator study combines topics in areas such as Computer hardware and Control signal. His studies deal with areas such as Control and Control circuit as well as Simulation.

Between 2016 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Haptically enabled modular peripheral device assembly (6 citations)
  • Modular peripheral device assembly (4 citations)
  • Methods and apparatuses for endstop diminishment solutions in haptically-enabled controller devices (4 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Electrical engineering
  • Mechanical engineering

His primary areas of study are Haptic technology, Signal, Simulation, Actuator and Output device. The study incorporates disciplines such as Vibration and Computer vision in addition to Haptic technology. The various areas that Danny A. Grant examines in his Actuator study include Control, Control circuit and Torque.

His Output device study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Wearable computer and Sense. His work deals with themes such as Haptic control, Sensor fusion, Seat belt and Sample, which intersect with Sense. His work on Rendering, Feature and Texture as part of his general Artificial intelligence study is frequently connected to Peripheral and Graphical user interface, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.

Best Publications

  • Haptic interfaces and devices

    Vincent Hayward;Oliver R. Astley;Manuel Cruz‐Hernandez;Danny Grant

  • System and method for controlling haptic devices having multiple operational modes

    Danny A Grant;Kollin M Tierling;Juan Michael Cruz-Hernandez;Alex S Goldenberg

  • Haptic feedback using rotary harmonic moving mass

    David F. Bailey;Danny Grant;Alex Jasso;Ken Martin

  • Haptic feedback for button and scroll operation simulation in touch type input device

    Danny Grant;Pedro Gregorio;Robert W Heubel;Christophe Ramstein

  • Multi-touch device having dynamic haptic effects

    Robert W. Heubel;Danny A. Grant

  • Method and apparatus for haptic enabled flexible touch sensitive surface

    Danny A. Grant;Hernandez Juan Manuel Cruz;Christophe Ramstein

  • Systems and methods for adaptive interpretation of input from a touch-sensitive input device

    Henry Dacosta;Christophe Ramstein;Danny Grant

  • Transparent compound piezoelectric material aggregate of contact sensor and tactile sense actuator

    A Grant Danny;Manuel Cruz Fernandez Juan;Ari Modales;Christoph Rammstein

  • Variable structure control of shape memory alloy actuators

    D. Grant;V. Hayward

  • Electro-vibrotactile display

    Juan Manuel Cruz-Hernandez;Danny A. Grant

  • Controlling haptic feedback for enhancing navigation in a graphical environment

    Louis B. Rosenberg;Matthew Mather;Danny Grant;Christophe Ramstein

  • Method and apparatus for providing haptic feedback having a position-based component and a predetermined time-based component

    Danny Grant

  • Systems and methods for friction displays and additional haptic effects

    Juan Manuel Cruz-Hernandez;Danny A. Grant

  • Method and apparatus for providing a fixed relief touch screen with locating features using deformable haptic surfaces

    Danny A. Grant;Juan Manuel Cruz-Hernandez

  • Haptic feedback using composite piezoelectric haptic tape actuator

    Juan Manuel Cruz-Hernandez;Ali Modarres;Danny A. Grant;Christophe Ramstein

  • Multiple mode haptic feedback system

    Pedro Gregorio;Danny A. Grant;Juan Manuel Cruz-Hernandez

  • Systems and Methods for Providing Features in a Friction Display

    Juan Manuel Cruz-Hernandez;Danny A. Grant

  • Tactile sense effect based on proximity detection

    A Grant Danny;Gregorio Pedro;Andre Lacroix Robert;グラント,ダニー,エー.

  • System and method for mapping instructions associated with haptic feedback

    Kollin M. Tierling;Juan Manuel Cruz-Hernandez;Alex S. Goldenberg;Danny A. Grant

  • Methods and systems for providing haptic messaging to handheld communication devices

    Danny A. Grant;Jeffrey Eid;Shoichi Endo

Frequent Co-Authors

Juan Manuel Cruz-Hernandez
Juan Manuel Cruz-Hernandez Immersion (United States)
David Birnbaum
David Birnbaum Immersion (United States)
Vincent Levesque
Vincent Levesque École de Technologie Supérieure
Christopher J. Ullrich
Christopher J. Ullrich Immersion (United States)
Vincent Hayward
Vincent Hayward Sorbonne University
Allison M. Okamura
Allison M. Okamura Stanford University
Marc O. Ernst
Marc O. Ernst University of Ulm
Susan J. Lederman
Susan J. Lederman Queen's University
Martin Buss
Martin Buss Technical University of Munich
Domenico Prattichizzo
Domenico Prattichizzo University of Siena

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open doors to flexible, high-demand careers in Computer Science and related fields. For those seeking high returns on their investment, consider the best online degrees that are recognized for both quality and strong earning potential. These options allow you to learn at your own pace and often provide quicker routes to the job market.

Affordability is also a key consideration. If you are interested in advanced fields like machine learning or automation, look into the cheapest online master's in artificial intelligence for cost-effective pathways to specialization.

Choosing the right major makes a difference for your future prospects. The college programs you select can impact both the skills you'll acquire and the career paths open to you.

For those balancing work or family, the easiest masters degree to get may offer a practical solution. These programs can often be completed faster and with greater flexibility, helping you advance your career without putting life on hold.

Best Scientists Citing Danny A. Grant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles