World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nathan Keller

Nathan Keller

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5757
World Ranking
11229
National Ranking
178

Nathan Keller publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan Keller sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 142 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nathan Keller D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan Keller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nathan Keller is affiliated with Bar-Ilan University in Israel and has made scholarly contributions mainly in the fields of Mathematics and Computer Science. Their research encompasses several specialized subfields such as Computational Theory and Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, and Algebra and Number Theory.

Their work has been published in various academic venues, with repeated contributions to Advances in Mathematics and arXiv (Cornell University). Additional publications appear in the Journal of the European Mathematical Society and the Israel Journal of Mathematics.

Nathan Keller's recent papers include:

  • "Stability for the complete intersection theorem, and the forbidden intersection problem of Erdős and Sós" (2024, Journal of the European Mathematical Society)
  • "The junta method for hypergraphs and the Erdős-Chvátal simplex conjecture" (2021, Advances in Mathematics)
  • "On t-intersecting families of permutations" (2024, Advances in Mathematics)
  • "A structure theorem for almost low-degree functions on the slice" (2020, Israel Journal of Mathematics)
  • "Sharp Hypercontractivity for Global Functions" (2023, arXiv [Cornell University])

The main topics addressed in Nathan Keller's research cover:

  • Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
  • Advanced Graph Theory Research
  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems
  • Graph theory and CDMA systems
  • Coding theory and cryptography
  • Commutative Algebra and Its Applications

Frequent co-authors with whom Nathan Keller has collaborated include Noam Lifshitz, Ohad Sheinfeld, David Ellis, Dor Minzer, and Ohad Klein.

Best Publications

  • Instant Ciphertext-Only Cryptanalysis of GSM Encrypted Communication

    Elad Barkan;Eli Biham;Nathan Keller

  • The Rectangle Attack - Rectangling the Serpent.

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • Related-Key boomerang and rectangle attacks

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • Key recovery attacks of practical complexity on AES-256 variants with up to 10 rounds

    Alex Biryukov;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Dmitry Khovratovich

  • New Impossible Differential Attacks on AES

    Jiqiang Lu;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Jongsung Kim

  • A related-key rectangle attack on the full KASUMI

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • Minimalism in cryptography: the even-mansour scheme revisited

    Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Adi Shamir

  • Improved Single-Key Attacks on 8-Round AES-192 and AES-256

    Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Adi Shamir

  • A practical-time related-key attack on the KASUMI cryptosystem used in GSM and 3G telephony

    Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Adi Shamir

  • A practical attack on KeeLoq

    Sebastiaan Indesteege;Nathan Keller;Orr Dunkelman;Eli Biham

  • A Practical Attack on KeeLoq

    Sebastiaan Indesteege;Nathan Keller;Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman

  • New results on boomerang and rectangle attacks

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • Enhancing differential-linear cryptanalysis

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • Improving the efficiency of impossible differential cryptanalysis of reduced Camellia and MISTY1

    Jiqiang Lu;Jongsung Kim;Nathan Keller;Orr Dunkelman

  • Related-Key impossible differential attacks on 8-round AES-192

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • Efficient Dissection of Composite Problems, with Applications to Cryptanalysis, Knapsacks, and Combinatorial Search Problems

    Itai Dinur;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Adi Shamir

  • Low-Data Complexity Attacks on AES

    C. Bouillaguet;P. Derbez;O. Dunkelman;P. Fouque

  • DLCT: A New Tool for Differential-Linear Cryptanalysis

    Achiya Bar-On;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Ariel Weizman

  • Differential-linear cryptanalysis of serpent

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • A Practical-Time Attack on the A5/3 Cryptosystem Used in Third Generation GSM Telephony.

    Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Adi Shamir

  • A Practical Attack on KeeLoq

    Wim Aerts;Eli Biham;Dieter De Moitié;Elke De Mulder

  • Improved Single-Key Attacks on 8-Round AES-192 and AES-256

    Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Adi Shamir

  • Related-Key Boomerang and Rectangle Attacks.

    Jongsung Kim;Seokhie Hong;Bart Preneel;Eli Biham

Frequent Co-Authors

Orr Dunkelman
Orr Dunkelman University of Haifa
Adi Shamir
Adi Shamir Weizmann Institute of Science
Eli Biham
Eli Biham Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Gil Kalai
Gil Kalai Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Bart Preneel
Bart Preneel KU Leuven
Ramarathnam Venkatesan
Ramarathnam Venkatesan Microsoft (United States)
Ilya Mironov
Ilya Mironov Google (United States)
Noam Nisan
Noam Nisan Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Itai Benjamini
Itai Benjamini Weizmann Institute of Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Computer Science opens up a range of flexible educational and career opportunities. Students who prefer adaptable learning may consider earning an online associate's degree in computer science or IT disciplines. This pathway is ideal for those seeking a faster entry into the technology workforce or looking to build foundational skills before transferring to a four-year program.

For learners interested in high-demand roles, exploring the most useful graduate degrees—including advanced computer science, data analytics, and cybersecurity—can lead to lucrative and stable career prospects. These programs tend to offer robust earning potential and align with growing industry needs.

Affordability is another crucial factor. Many students search for cheap online college classes to minimize student debt and make quality education more accessible. Additionally, several best colleges for low gpa offer online degrees, enabling students with diverse academic backgrounds to pursue further studies and enhance their career options.

Whether you’re just starting out or looking to advance your skills, these flexible online pathways can help you reach your goals in computer science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Nathan Keller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles