World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
40
Citations
8445
World Ranking
6013
National Ranking
147

Grzegorz Mikusiński publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grzegorz Mikusiński sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Grzegorz Mikusiński D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grzegorz Mikusiński sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Grzegorz Mikusiński is affiliated with the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Sweden. Their research has predominantly focused on environmental science and the agricultural and biological sciences, with substantial contributions to the understanding of global and planetary change, ecology, and insect science.

Their work spans multiple interconnected subfields, including:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Insect Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecological Modeling

Mikusiński's research topics cover a broad spectrum related to forest ecosystems and environmental management. The main topics addressed in their publications are:

  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Fire Effects on Ecosystems
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Their recent scholarly output includes papers such as:

  • "Sweden does not meet agreed national and international forest biodiversity targets: A call for adaptive landscape planning" (2020, Landscape and Urban Planning)
  • "Abundance, species richness and diversity of forest bird assemblages - The relative importance of habitat structures and landscape context" (2021, Ecological Indicators)
  • "What do tree-related microhabitats tell us about the abundance of forest-dwelling bats, birds, and insects?" (2020, Journal of Environmental Management)
  • "Estimating retention benchmarks for salvage logging to protect biodiversity" (2020, Nature Communications)
  • "Conservation significance of intact forest landscapes in the Scandinavian Mountains Green Belt" (2020, Landscape Ecology)

Frequently, Mikusiński has collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Johan Svensson
  • Bengt Gunnar Jonsson
  • Ilse Storch
  • Jakub W. Bubnicki
  • Per Angelstam

Their publications often appear in venues known for focusing on environmental and conservation topics, including:

  • Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
  • Biological Conservation
  • Sustainability
  • Current Forestry Reports
  • Communications Earth & Environment

Best Publications

  • Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species

    Lars Gamfeldt;Tord Snäll;Robert Bagchi;Micael Jonsson

  • Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space

    Ulf G. Sandstrom;Per Angelstam;Per Angelstam;Grzegorz Mikusinski;Grzegorz Mikusinski

  • Woodpeckers as Indicators of Forest Bird Diversity

    Grzegorz Mikusiński;Maciej Gromadzki;Przemyslaw Chylarecki

  • Densities of large living and dead trees in old-growth temperate and boreal forests

    Sven G Nilsson;Mats Niklasson;Jonas Hedin;Gillis Aronsson

  • Erratum to “Densities of large living and dead trees in old-growth temperate and boreal forests”

    Sven G. Nilsson;Mats Niklasson;Jonas Hedin;Gillis Aronsson

  • Woodpecker assemblages in natural and managed boreal and hemiboreal forest: a review

    P. Angelstam;G. Mikusinski

  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Lawrence N. Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L.L. Hill;Samantha L.L. Hill

  • The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts

    Lawrence N Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L L Hill;Samantha L L Hill

  • Incorporating social and cultural significance of large old trees in conservation policy.

    Malgorzata Blicharska;Grzegorz Mikusiński

  • Biodiversity’s contributions to sustainable development

    Malgorzata Blicharska;Richard J. Smithers;Grzegorz Mikusiński;Patrik Rönnbäck

  • Habitat thresholds for focal species at multiple scales and forest biodiversity conservation - dead wood as an example

    Per K. Angelstam;Rita BüTLER;Marius Lazdinis;Grzegorz Mikusinski

  • Steps to overcome the North–South divide in research relevant to climate change policy and practice

    Malgorzata Blicharska;Malgorzata Blicharska;Richard J. Smithers;Magdalena Kuchler;Ganesh K. Agrawal

  • Economic Geography, Forest Distribution, and Woodpecker Diversity in Central Europe

    Grzegorz Mikusiński;Per Angelstam

  • The white-backed woodpecker: umbrella species for forest conservation planning?

    Jean-Michel Roberge;Jean-Michel Roberge;Grzegorz Mikusiński;Sören Svensson

  • Gaps in ecological research on the world's largest internationally coordinated network of protected areas: A review of Natura 2000

    Ewa H. Orlikowska;Jean-Michel Roberge;Malgorzata Blicharska;Malgorzata Blicharska;Grzegorz Mikusiński

  • Shades of grey challenge practical application of the cultural ecosystem services concept

    Malgorzata Blicharska;Malgorzata Blicharska;Richard J. Smithers;Marcus Hedblom;Henrik Hedenås

  • What do tree-related microhabitats tell us about the abundance of forest-dwelling bats, birds, and insects?

    Marco Basile;Thomas Asbeck;Marlotte Jonker;Anna K. Knuff

  • Abundance, species richness and diversity of forest bird assemblages – The relative importance of habitat structures and landscape context

    Marco Basile;Marco Basile;Ilse Storch;Grzegorz Mikusiński;Grzegorz Mikusiński

  • Assessing Village Authenticity with Satellite Images: A Method to Identify Intact Cultural Landscapes in Europe

    Per Angelstam;Laine Boresjö-Bronge;Grzegorz Mikusiński;Ulf Sporrong

  • Sweden does not meet agreed national and international forest biodiversity targets: A call for adaptive landscape planning

    Per Angelstam;Per Angelstam;Michael Manton;Martin Green;Bengt Gunnar Jonsson;Bengt Gunnar Jonsson

  • Why is it difficult to enlarge a protected area? Ecosystem services perspective on the conflict around the extension of the Białowieża National Park in Poland

    Krzysztof Niedzialkowski;Malgorzata Blicharska;Malgorzata Blicharska;Grzegorz Mikusinski;Grzegorz Mikusinski;Bogumila Jedrzejewska

  • Two-dimensional gap analysis: a tool for efficient conservation planning and biodiversity policy implementation.

    Per Angelstam;Grzegorz Mikusiński;Britt-Inger Rönnbäck;Anders Östman

  • Woodpeckers : distribution, conservation, and research in a global perspective

    Grzegorz Mikusinski

Frequent Co-Authors

Per Angelstam
Per Angelstam Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
Tom M. Fayle
Tom M. Fayle Queen Mary University of London
Tim Diekötter
Tim Diekötter Kiel University
Alain Dejean
Alain Dejean Paul Sabatier University
Tim Newbold
Tim Newbold University College London
Andy Purvis
Andy Purvis Natural History Museum
Samantha L. L. Hill
Samantha L. L. Hill World Conservation Monitoring Centre
Jason M. Tylianakis
Jason M. Tylianakis University of Canterbury
Tony R. Walker
Tony R. Walker Dalhousie University
Jérémy Bouyer
Jérémy Bouyer INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Those interested in Ecology and Evolution often pursue flexible, online learning options to broaden their knowledge or shift careers. Interdisciplinary studies are especially valuable, allowing students to combine biology, environmental policy, and data analysis. For learners seeking cost-effective routes, consider the affordable online interdisciplinary studies degrees that blend science, sustainability, and research skills.

Additionally, a background in history can provide a unique perspective on how species and ecosystems evolve over time. Professionals looking to connect history with science can explore an masters in history to gain advanced research capabilities.

Ecology graduates may also consider library and information science, where they can work with scientific data, manage resources, or support educational initiatives. Understanding the average cost of mlis degree us can help students plan for a career in academic or research libraries.

If wildlife communication or advocacy interests you, look into health-focused options such as speech pathology. There are accredited speech pathology programs online that maintain rigorous standards and can lead to diverse career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Grzegorz Mikusiński

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles