World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Julie Beadle-Brown

Julie Beadle-Brown

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 38 5987 5564 983 914 177 5613

Julie Beadle-Brown publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julie Beadle-Brown between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julie Beadle-Brown published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2011. 4 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2011. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1998 2025

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julie Beadle-Brown: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 6
2001 1
2002 5
2003 7
2004 6
2005 4
2006 11
2007 5
2008 9
2009 9
2010 9
2011 14
2012 9
2013 4
2014 10
2015 10
2016 6
2017 7
2018 12
2019 8
2020 9
2021 6
2022 5
2023 4
2024 2
2025 2
Total 181
Download as CSV

Julie Beadle-Brown publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Beadle-Brown sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 177 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 177
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Julie Beadle-Brown D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Beadle-Brown sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278 38
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Julie Beadle-Brown is affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Health Professions, with a significant focus on General Health Professions and Education as subfields. Their work also covers Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Safety Research, and Clinical Psychology.

The research topics addressed by Julie Beadle-Brown include:

  • Healthcare innovation and challenges
  • Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Disability Rights and Representation
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement

Recent notable publications by Julie Beadle-Brown and their frequent collaborators include:

  • "Strengths-Based Approaches in Social Work and Social Care: Reviewing the Evidence," 2021, Journal of Long-Term Care
  • "COVID-19 IDD: Findings from a global survey exploring family members' and paid staff's perceptions of the impact of COVID-19 on individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and their caregivers," 2022, HRB Open Research
  • "Outcomes and costs of skilled support for people with severe or profound intellectual disability and complex needs," 2020, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
  • "COVID-19 IDD: A global survey exploring family members' and paid staff's perceptions of the impact of COVID-19 on individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their caregivers," 2020, HRB Open Research
  • "Redefining Self-Advocacy: A Practice Theory-Based Approach," 2020, Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities

Julie Beadle-Brown's frequent co-authors include:

  • Jan Šiška
  • Christine Bigby
  • Jill Bradshaw
  • Šárka Káňová
  • Lisa Richardson

Their work has been published frequently in venues such as:

  • HRB Open Research
  • Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
  • Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Journal of Long-Term Care

Best Publications

  • Outcomes in Different Residential Settings for People With Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review

    Agnes. Kozma;James. Mansell;Julie. Beadle-Brown

  • Chronicity of challenging behaviours in people with severe intellectual disabilities and/or autism: a total population sample.

    Glynis H. Murphy;Glynis H. Murphy;Julie Beadle-Brown;Lorna Wing;Judy Gould

  • Person‐Centred Planning or Person‐Centred Action? Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disability Services

    Jim Mansell;Julie Beadle-Brown

  • Deinstitutionalisation and community living – outcomes and costs: report of a European Study. Volume 2: main report

    Jim Mansell;Martin Knapp;Julie Beadle-Brown;Jennifer Beecham

  • Effect of Service Structure and Organization on Staff Care Practices in Small Community Homes for People with Intellectual Disabilities

    Jim Mansell;Julie Beadle-Brown;Beckie Whelton;Celia Beckett

  • Engagement in meaningful activity and "active support" of people with intellectual disabilities in residential care.

    Jim Mansell;Teresa Elliott;Julie Beadle-Brown;Bev Ashman

  • Improving Quality of Life Outcomes in Supported Accommodation for People with Intellectual Disability: What Makes a Difference?

    Christine Bigby;Julie Beadle-Brown;Julie Beadle-Brown

  • 'It's pretty hard with our ones, they can't talk, the more able bodied can participate' : staff attitudes about the applicability of disability policies to people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities

    Christine. Bigby;Timothy Frederick. Clement;Jim. Mansell;Julie. Beadle-Brown

  • Deinstitutionalization in intellectual disabilities

    Julie Beadle-Brown;Jim Mansell;Agnes Kozma

  • Active Support: Enabling and Empowering People with Intellectual Disabilities

    Jim Mansell;Julie Beadle-Brown

  • Quality of Life and Quality of Support for People with Severe Intellectual Disability and Complex Needs

    Julie Beadle-Brown;Julie Beadle-Brown;Jennifer S Leigh;Beckie Whelton;L Richardson

  • Deinstitutionalisation and community living: position statement of the Comparative Policy and Practice Special Interest Research Group of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities.

    Jim Mansell;Julie Beadle-Brown

  • Uncovering dimensions of culture in underperforming group homes for people with severe intellectual disability.

    Christine. Bigby;Marie. Knox;Julie. Beadle-Brown;Timothy. Clement

  • Person-centred active support - increasing choice, promoting independence and reducing challenging behaviour.

    Julie Beadle-Brown;Aislinn Hutchinson;Beckie Whelton

  • Resident Involvement in Activity in Small Community Homes for People with Learning Disabilities

    Jim Mansell;Julie Beadle‐Brown;Susan Macdonald;Bev Ashman

  • Adult Protection of People with Intellectual Disabilities: Incidence, Nature and Responses.

    Julie. Beadle-Brown;Jill. Mansell;Paul. Cambridge;Alisoun. Milne

  • Implementation of active support in Victoria, Australia: An exploratory study

    Jim Mansell;Julie Beadle-Brown;Christine Bigby

  • Observing practice leadership in intellectual and developmental disability services

    J. Beadle-Brown;J. Beadle-Brown;C. Bigby;E. Bould

  • Residential care in the community for adults with intellectual disability: needs, characteristics and services.

    Jim Mansell;Bev Ashman;Susan Macdonald;Julie Beadle-Brown

  • Living in Fear: Better outcomes for people with learning disabilities and autism.

    Julie Beadle-Brown;Lisa Richardson;Colin Guest;Aida Malovic

Frequent Co-Authors

Jim Mansell
Jim Mansell University of Kent
Christine Bigby
Christine Bigby La Trobe University
Jennifer Beecham
Jennifer Beecham University of Kent
Ann Netten
Ann Netten University of Kent
Glynis H. Murphy
Glynis H. Murphy University of Kent
Teresa Iacono
Teresa Iacono La Trobe University
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
Lorna Wing
Lorna Wing Medical Research Council
Andrew Whiten
Andrew Whiten University of St Andrews

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a range of online programs and career opportunities. One popular area is counseling, where students can pursue a cacrep online masters in counseling to obtain credentials required for clinical roles. Accreditation is crucial for licensing, so choosing a CACREP-recognized program is important.

For those interested in helping couples and families, marriage and family masters programs offer affordable pathways to specialize in therapy and interpersonal relationships. These programs prepare graduates for careers in counseling centers, private practice, and community agencies.

Students looking for flexibility and affordability can consider a cheap online psychology degree. These degrees provide foundational knowledge for roles in human resources, marketing, mental health services, and beyond. Plus, online formats allow learners to balance studies with other commitments.

For those passionate about social work, finding the easiest online msw program can simplify the admissions process and make earning a Master’s in Social Work more accessible. This pathway leads to rewarding positions in social services, advocacy, and public policy.

By choosing relevant online education in these fields, students can pursue careers that make a meaningful difference in society while enjoying flexible and affordable study options.

Best Scientists Citing Julie Beadle-Brown

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles