World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
36
Citations
5104
World Ranking
6508
National Ranking
1046

Jim Mansell publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Mansell sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 138 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jim Mansell D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Mansell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jim Mansell was affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom during their academic career. The scholar's work and contributions were situated within this institution, providing a context for their research activities and collaborations.

No records are available regarding recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues associated with Jim Mansell. Similarly, there is no detailed information about their main fields or subfields of study, nor about specific topics they focused on throughout their work.

There is no data on books published by Jim Mansell or awards received during their career. This profile refrains from speculation or inference about these aspects in the absence of documented evidence.

The absence of listed recent works and collaborative relationships suggests that public bibliometric data on Jim Mansell's academic output may be limited or not currently documented in accessible repositories.

Best Publications

  • Outcomes in Different Residential Settings for People With Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review

    Agnes. Kozma;James. Mansell;Julie. Beadle-Brown

  • Person‐Centred Planning or Person‐Centred Action? Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disability Services

    Jim Mansell;Julie Beadle-Brown

  • Deinstitutionalisation and community living: Progress, problems and priorities

    Jim Mansell

  • Deinstitutionalisation and community living – outcomes and costs: report of a European Study. Volume 2: main report

    Jim Mansell;Martin Knapp;Julie Beadle-Brown;Jennifer Beecham

  • Effect of Service Structure and Organization on Staff Care Practices in Small Community Homes for People with Intellectual Disabilities

    Jim Mansell;Julie Beadle-Brown;Beckie Whelton;Celia Beckett

  • Engagement in meaningful activity and "active support" of people with intellectual disabilities in residential care.

    Jim Mansell;Teresa Elliott;Julie Beadle-Brown;Bev Ashman

  • 'It's pretty hard with our ones, they can't talk, the more able bodied can participate' : staff attitudes about the applicability of disability policies to people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities

    Christine. Bigby;Timothy Frederick. Clement;Jim. Mansell;Julie. Beadle-Brown

  • Deinstitutionalization in intellectual disabilities

    Julie Beadle-Brown;Jim Mansell;Agnes Kozma

  • Active Support: Enabling and Empowering People with Intellectual Disabilities

    Jim Mansell;Julie Beadle-Brown

  • Deinstitutionalisation and community living: position statement of the Comparative Policy and Practice Special Interest Research Group of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities.

    Jim Mansell;Julie Beadle-Brown

  • Uncovering dimensions of culture in underperforming group homes for people with severe intellectual disability.

    Christine. Bigby;Marie. Knox;Julie. Beadle-Brown;Timothy. Clement

  • Severe Learning Disabilities and Challenging Behaviours: Designing high quality services

    Eric Emerson;Peter McGill;Jim Mansell

  • Raising our sights: services for adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities

    Jim Mansell

  • Active support: a critical review and commentary.

    Roger J. Stancliffe;Edwin Jones;Jim Mansell;Kathy Lowe

  • Resident Involvement in Activity in Small Community Homes for People with Learning Disabilities

    Jim Mansell;Julie Beadle‐Brown;Susan Macdonald;Bev Ashman

  • Evaluation of alternative residential facilities for the severely mentally handicapped in Wessex: Client engagement

    David John Felce;Albert Kushlick;Jim Mansell

  • Increasing purposeful activity of severely and profoundly mentally-handicapped adults

    Jim Mansell;David John Felce;Ursula de Kock;Judith Jenkins

  • Implementation of active support in Victoria, Australia: An exploratory study

    Jim Mansell;Julie Beadle-Brown;Christine Bigby

  • Developing staffed housing for people with mental handicaps

    Jim Mansell;David Felce;J. Jenkins;U. de Kock

  • Deinstitutionalization and Community Living

    Jim Mansell;Kent Ericsson

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie Beadle-Brown
Julie Beadle-Brown University of Kent
David John Felce
David John Felce Cardiff University
Eric Emerson
Eric Emerson Lancaster University
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
Jennifer Beecham
Jennifer Beecham University of Kent
Christine Bigby
Christine Bigby La Trobe University
Roger J. Stancliffe
Roger J. Stancliffe University of Sydney
David Challis
David Challis University of Nottingham
Ann Netten
Ann Netten University of Kent
Glynis H. Murphy
Glynis H. Murphy University of Kent

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to rewarding careers in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. Many students today opt for online degrees, valuing their flexibility and accessibility.

When considering counseling or therapy roles, paying attention to program accreditation is crucial. Choosing a program with cacrep accreditation ensures you meet professional licensure requirements and obtain high-quality training. For those interested in family dynamics and therapy, there are many mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) offered online, providing a focused path into this in-demand field.

Psychology remains a popular major with a broad professional spectrum. If you are seeking flexibility, check out online degrees for psychology that allow you to study at your own pace and prepare for diverse careers in mental health and research.

Social work is another vital field addressing community needs and social change. If you’re looking for accessible options, there are some of the easiest msw online programs to get into, offering a practical route to becoming a licensed social worker.

Best Scientists Citing Jim Mansell

Recently Published Articles