World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
10295
World Ranking
6149
National Ranking
175

Jaap J. Plomp publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaap J. Plomp sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 114 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jaap J. Plomp D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaap J. Plomp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jaap J. Plomp is affiliated with Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands. The research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Neurology and related subfields such as Molecular Biology, Surgery, Infectious Diseases, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist's work addresses multiple main topics, including:

  • Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
  • Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Ion channel regulation and function
  • Antifungal resistance and susceptibility

Jaap J. Plomp has contributed to several recent research papers, notable examples include:

  • Advances in the understanding of disease mechanisms of autoimmune neuromuscular junction disorders, 2022, The Lancet Neurology
  • Functional monovalency amplifies the pathogenicity of anti-MuSK IgG4 in myasthenia gravis, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Simvastatin Treatment Does Not Ameliorate Muscle Pathophysiology in a Mouse Model for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, 2020, Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases
  • A bioassay for neuromuscular junction-restricted complement activation by myasthenia gravis acetylcholine receptor antibodies, 2022, Journal of Neuroscience Methods
  • Development and characterization of agonistic antibodies targeting the Ig-like 1 domain of MuSK, 2023, Scientific Reports

Collaborations are a significant aspect of the scientist's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Maartje G. Huijbers
  • Jan J.G.M. Verschuuren
  • Dana L.E. Vergoossen
  • Silvère M. van der Maarel
  • Roy Augustinus

The research is often published in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuromuscular Disorders
  • The Lancet Neurology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Science Translational Medicine

Best Publications

  • Synaptic Assembly of the Brain in the Absence of Neurotransmitter Secretion

    M Verhage;A S Maia;J J Plomp;A B Brussaard

  • A Cacna1a Knockin Migraine Mouse Model with Increased Susceptibility to Cortical Spreading Depression

    Arn M.J.M van den Maagdenberg;Daniela Pietrobon;Tommaso Pizzorusso;Simon Kaja

  • Acquired neuromyotonia: evidence for autoantibodies directed against K+ channels of peripheral nerves.

    Paul Shillito;Peter C. Molenaar;Angela Vincent;Angela Vincent;Katherine Leys

  • Abnormal myotonic dystrophy protein kinase levels produce only mild myopathy in mice

    Gert Jansen;P.J.T.A. Groenen;D. Bächner;P.H.K. Jap

  • MuSK IgG4 autoantibodies cause myasthenia gravis by inhibiting binding between MuSK and Lrp4

    Maartje G. Huijbers;Wei Zhang;Rinse Klooster;Erik H. Niks

  • Monoclonal antibodies raised against Guillain-Barré syndrome–associated Campylobacter jejuni lipopolysaccharides react with neuronal gangliosides and paralyze muscle-nerve preparations

    Carl S. Goodyear;Graham M. O’Hanlon;Jaap J. Plomp;Eric R. Wagner

  • Eculizumab prevents anti-ganglioside antibody-mediated neuropathy in a murine model.

    Susan K. Halstead;Femke M. P. Zitman;Peter D. Humphreys;Kay Greenshields

  • Muscle-specific kinase myasthenia gravis IgG4 autoantibodies cause severe neuromuscular junction dysfunction in mice

    Rinse Klooster;Jaap J. Plomp;Maartje G. Huijbers;Maartje G. Huijbers;Erik H. Niks

  • Miller Fisher anti-GQ1b antibodies: alpha-latrotoxin-like effects on motor end plates.

    J. J. Plomp;P. C. Molenaar;G. M. O'hanlon;B. C. Jacobs

  • High cortical spreading depression susceptibility and migraine-associated symptoms in Ca(v)2.1 S218L mice.

    Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg;Tommaso Pizzorusso;Simon Kaja;Nicole Terpolilli

  • Adaptation of quantal content to decreased postsynaptic sensitivity at single endplates in alpha-bungarotoxin-treated rats.

    J. J. Plomp;G. T. H. Van Kempen;P. C. Molenaar

  • Munc18-1 expression levels control synapse recovery by regulating readily releasable pool size

    Ruud F. G. Toonen;Keimpe Wierda;Keimpe Wierda;Michèle S. Sons;Heidi de Wit

  • Anti-GQ1b ganglioside antibodies mediate complement-dependent destruction of the motor nerve terminal

    Graham M. O'Hanlon;Jaap J. Plomp;Mahua Chakrabarti;Ian Morrison

  • Anti-disialoside antibodies kill perisynaptic Schwann cells and damage motor nerve terminals via membrane attack complex in a murine model of neuropathy.

    Susan K Halstead;Graham M O'Hanlon;Peter D Humphreys;Deborah B Morrison

  • Pathophysiology of myasthenia gravis with antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor, muscle-specific kinase and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4

    Jan J.G.M. Verschuuren;Maartje G. Huijbers;Jaap J. Plomp;Erik H. Niks

  • The expanding field of IgG4-mediated neurological autoimmune disorders

    M. G. Huijbers;L. A. Querol;E. H. Niks;J. J. Plomp

  • Natural disease history of the D2-mdx mouse model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy

    Maaike van Putten;Kayleigh Putker;Maurice Overzier;W. A. Adamzek

  • Overexpression of GD1a ganglioside sensitizes motor nerve terminals to anti-GD1a antibody-mediated injury in a model of acute motor axonal neuropathy.

    John A. Goodfellow;Tyrone Bowes;Tyrone Bowes;Kazim A Sheikh;Masaaki Odaka;Masaaki Odaka

  • The neuropathic potential of anti-GM1 autoantibodies is regulated by the local glycolipid environment in mice

    Kay N. Greenshields;Susan K. Halstead;Femke M.P. Zitman;Simon Rinaldi

  • Immunoglobulins inhibit pathophysiological effects of anti-GQ1b-positive sera at motor nerve terminals through inhibition of antibody binding☆

    BC Jacobs;GM O'Hanlon;RW Bullens;J Veitch

  • Complex Gangliosides at the Neuromuscular Junction Are Membrane Receptors for Autoantibodies and Botulinum Neurotoxin But Redundant for Normal Synaptic Function

    Roland W. M. Bullens;Graham M. O'Hanlon;Eric Wagner;Peter C. Molenaar

Frequent Co-Authors

Hugh J. Willison
Hugh J. Willison University of Glasgow
Jan J.G.M. Verschuuren
Jan J.G.M. Verschuuren Leiden University Medical Center
Peter C. M. Molenaar
Peter C. M. Molenaar Pennsylvania State University
Rune R. Frants
Rune R. Frants Leiden University
Michel D. Ferrari
Michel D. Ferrari Leiden University Medical Center
Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg
Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg Leiden University Medical Center
Annemieke Aartsma-Rus
Annemieke Aartsma-Rus Leiden University Medical Center
Silvère M. van der Maarel
Silvère M. van der Maarel Leiden University Medical Center
Bart C. Jacobs
Bart C. Jacobs Erasmus University Rotterdam
Koichi Furukawa
Koichi Furukawa Chubu University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jaap J. Plomp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles