World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 67 2510 2383 94 90 253 20857

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Annemieke Aartsma-Rus between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Annemieke Aartsma-Rus published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 16.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2025. 49 of the 399 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2025. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 9 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 30 publications
2002 2025

399 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Annemieke Aartsma-Rus: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 4
2005 1
2006 9
2007 4
2008 6
2009 12
2010 15
2011 25
2012 27
2013 21
2014 29
2015 22
2016 19
2017 22
2018 28
2019 22
2020 25
2021 19
2022 15
2023 23
2024 19
2025 30
Total 399
Download as CSV

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annemieke Aartsma-Rus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 245–254 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 253 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114 253
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annemieke Aartsma-Rus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184 67
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus is affiliated with Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on areas within Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology as well as Medicine.

The scientist has contributed to multiple fields of study, including:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies

Frequent coauthors in their publications are:

  • Maaike van Putten (29 publications)
  • Pietro Spitali (19 publications)
  • David van de Vijver (15 publications)
  • E. Niks (13 publications)
  • Marlen C. Lauffer (12 publications)

They have published extensively across several journals and venues, including:

  • Neuromuscular Disorders (28 publications)
  • Nucleic Acid Therapeutics (12 publications)
  • Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases (9 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (8 publications)
  • PLoS ONE (4 publications)

Some recent papers authored by Annemieke Aartsma-Rus include:

  • "Duchenne muscular dystrophy," 2021, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • "Delivery of oligonucleotide-based therapeutics: challenges and opportunities," 2021, EMBO Molecular Medicine
  • "Possibilities and limitations of antisense oligonucleotide therapies for the treatment of monogenic disorders," 2024, Communications Medicine
  • "Opportunities and challenges for antisense oligonucleotide therapies," 2020, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
  • "The 10th Oligonucleotide Therapy Approved: Golodirsen for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy," 2020, Nucleic Acid Therapeutics

Best Publications

  • Local Dystrophin Restoration with Antisense Oligonucleotide PRO051

    Judith C. van Deutekom;Anneke A. Janson;Ieke B. Ginjaar;Wendy S. Frankhuizen

  • Systemic administration of PRO051 in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy.

    Nathalie M Goemans;Mar Tulinius;Johanna T van den Akker;Brigitte E Burm

  • Entries in the Leiden Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutation database: an overview of mutation types and paradoxical cases that confirm the reading-frame rule.

    Annemieke Aartsma-Rus;Judith C. T. Van Deutekom;Ivo F. Fokkema;Gert-Jan B. Van Ommen

  • Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

    Dongsheng Duan;Nathalie Goemans;Shin'ichi Takeda;Eugenio Mercuri

  • Theoretic applicability of antisense-mediated exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutations.

    Annemieke Aartsma-Rus;Ivo Fokkema;Jan Verschuuren;Ieke Ginjaar

  • The TREAT-NMD DMD Global Database: Analysis of More than 7,000 Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Mutations

    Catherine L. Bladen;David Salgado;Soledad Monges;Maria E. Foncuberta

  • Digenic inheritance of an SMCHD1 mutation and an FSHD-permissive D4Z4 allele causes facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2

    Richard J.L.F. Lemmers;Rabi Tawil;Lisa M. Petek;Judit Balog

  • Prevalence, incidence and carrier frequency of 5q–linked spinal muscular atrophy – a literature review

    Ingrid E. C. Verhaart;Agata Robertson;Ian J. Wilson;Annemieke Aartsma-Rus

  • Therapeutic antisense-induced exon skipping in cultured muscle cells from six different DMD patients

    Annemieke Aartsma-Rus;Anneke A.M. Janson;Wendy E. Kaman;Mattie Bremmer-Bout

  • Therapeutic developments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

    Ingrid E C Verhaart;Annemieke Aartsma-Rus

  • The importance of genetic diagnosis for Duchenne muscular dystrophy

    Annemieke Aartsma-Rus;Ieke B Ginjaar;Kate Bushby

  • Antisense-Induced Multiexon Skipping for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Makes More Sense

    Annemieke Aartsma-Rus;Anneke A.M. Janson;Wendy E. Kaman;Mattie Bremmer-Bout

  • FDA Approves Eteplirsen for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: The Next Chapter in the Eteplirsen Saga.

    Annemieke Aartsma-Rus;Arthur M. Krieg

  • Antisense-mediated exon skipping: A versatile tool with therapeutic and research applications

    Annemieke Aartsma-Rus;Gert-Jan B. van Ommen

  • Delivery of oligonucleotide-based therapeutics: challenges and opportunities.

    Suzan M. Hammond;Annemieke Aartsma-Rus;Sandra Alves;Sven Even F. Borgos

  • Targeted exon skipping as a potential gene correction therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

    Annemieke Aartsma-Rus;Mattie Bremmer-Bout;Anneke A.M Janson;Johan T den Dunnen

  • The Pathogenesis and Therapy of Muscular Dystrophies

    Simon Guiraud;Annemieke Aartsma-Rus;Natassia M. Vieira;Kay E. Davies

  • In vivo comparison of 2'-O-methyl phosphorothioate and morpholino antisense oligonucleotides for Duchenne muscular dystrophy exon skipping.

    Hans A. Heemskerk;Christa L. de Winter;Sjef J. de Kimpe;Petra van Kuik-Romeijn

  • Comparative analysis of antisense oligonucleotide sequences for targeted skipping of exon 51 during dystrophin pre-mRNA splicing in human muscle

    V. Arechavala-Gomeza;I.R. Graham;L.J. Popplewell;Abbie Adams

  • Current status of pharmaceutical and genetic therapeutic approaches to treat DMD.

    Christophe Pichavant;Annemieke Aartsma-Rus;Paula R Clemens;Kay E Davies

Frequent Co-Authors

Gert-Jan B. van Ommen
Gert-Jan B. van Ommen Leiden University Medical Center
Peter A. C. 't Hoen
Peter A. C. 't Hoen Radboud University
Francesco Muntoni
Francesco Muntoni University College London
Johan T. den Dunnen
Johan T. den Dunnen Leiden University Medical Center
Hanns Lochmüller
Hanns Lochmüller University of Freiburg
Jan J.G.M. Verschuuren
Jan J.G.M. Verschuuren Leiden University Medical Center
Volker Straub
Volker Straub Newcastle University
Alessandra Ferlini
Alessandra Ferlini University of Ferrara
Kate Bushby
Kate Bushby Newcastle University
Eugenio Mercuri
Eugenio Mercuri Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in broadening your career options within genetics or healthcare? Many students are turning to flexible educational routes that fit a variety of goals and schedules. For example, online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa offer valuable preparation for administrative roles in the medical field, often with financial aid options to help manage costs.

If you’re eager to jump-start your career, accelerated college programs allow you to complete your studies faster, making it easier to enter the workforce quickly or advance your education. Those seeking maximum flexibility may prefer self paced online degrees, which can be especially helpful for balancing study with work or family responsibilities.

Finally, to streamline your application process and save on extra expenses, look for opportunities at online college free application institutions. Exploring these pathways can open doors to rewarding careers in genetics, healthcare administration, research, and more—all on your own terms.

Best Scientists Citing Annemieke Aartsma-Rus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles