World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 74 1239 1103 31 30 199 17363

James M. Murphy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James M. Murphy between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James M. Murphy published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2021. 12 of the 297 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2021. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 12 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 37 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 2 publications
2001 2026

297 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James M. Murphy: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 1
2003 3
2004 1
2005 0
2006 3
2007 5
2008 3
2009 6
2010 7
2011 5
2012 1
2013 12
2014 19
2015 20
2016 14
2017 21
2018 17
2019 21
2020 21
2021 37
2022 22
2023 27
2024 17
2025 10
2026 2
Total 297
Download as CSV

James M. Murphy publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 197–206 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 199 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100 199
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

James M. Murphy D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89 74
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

James M. Murphy is affiliated with the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research in Australia. Their research predominantly spans the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, contributing extensively to molecular biology, immunology, cell biology, oncology, and genetics.

Their research focuses notably on cell death mechanisms and regulation, interferon and immune responses, PARP inhibition in cancer therapy, phagocytosis and immune regulation, Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ, inflammasome and immune disorders, and nuclear structure and function.

Recent significant publications include:

  • MLKL trafficking and accumulation at the plasma membrane control the kinetics and threshold for necroptosis (2020, Nature Communications)
  • Necroptosis Signaling Promotes Inflammation, Airway Remodeling, and Emphysema in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (2021, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine)
  • Ferroptosis mediates selective motor neuron death in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (2021, Cell Death and Differentiation)
  • Sublethal necroptosis signaling promotes inflammation and liver cancer (2023, Immunity)
  • The regulation of necroptosis by post-translational modifications (2021, Cell Death and Differentiation)

These works reflect a sustained focus on necroptosis and related cell death pathways and their roles in inflammation, cancer, and neurodegeneration.

Frequent collaborators include:

  • André L. Samson
  • Samuel N. Young
  • Christopher R. Horne
  • Joanne M. Hildebrand
  • Sarah E. Garnish

James M. Murphy publishes regularly in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 17 publications
  • Nature Communications with 14 publications
  • Cell Death and Differentiation with 9 publications
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature with 9 publications
  • Biochemical Journal with 7 publications

Best Publications

  • The Pseudokinase MLKL Mediates Necroptosis via a Molecular Switch Mechanism

    James M. Murphy;Peter E. Czabotar;Peter E. Czabotar;Joanne M. Hildebrand;Joanne M. Hildebrand;Isabelle S. Lucet

  • RIPK1 regulates RIPK3-MLKL-driven systemic inflammation and emergency hematopoiesis.

    James A Rickard;James A Rickard;Joanne A O'Donnell;Joanne A O'Donnell;Joseph M Evans;Joseph M Evans;Najoua Lalaoui;Najoua Lalaoui

  • Activation of the pseudokinase MLKL unleashes the four-helix bundle domain to induce membrane localization and necroptotic cell death

    Joanne M. Hildebrand;Maria C. Tanzer;Isabelle S. Lucet;Isabelle S. Lucet;Samuel N. Young

  • Rheumatoid arthritis-interstitial lung disease-associated mortality.

    Amy L. Olson;Jeffrey J. Swigris;David B. Sprunger;Aryeh Fischer

  • Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 secreted by primary breast tumors stimulates migration of mesenchymal stem cells.

    R.M. Dwyer;S.M. Potter-Beirne;K.A. Harrington;A.J. Lowery

  • Active MLKL triggers the NLRP3 inflammasome in a cell-intrinsic manner.

    Stephanie A. Conos;Stephanie A. Conos;Kaiwen W Chen;Dominic De Nardo;Dominic De Nardo;Hideki Hara

  • The molecular basis of JAK/STAT inhibition by SOCS1

    Nicholas P. D. Liau;Nicholas P. D. Liau;Artem Laktyushin;Artem Laktyushin;Isabelle S. Lucet;Isabelle S. Lucet;James M. Murphy;James M. Murphy

  • The molecular regulation of Janus kinase (JAK) activation.

    Jeffrey J. Babon;Jeffrey J. Babon;Isabelle S. Lucet;Isabelle S. Lucet;James M. Murphy;James M. Murphy;Nicos A. Nicola;Nicos A. Nicola

  • Suppression of Cytokine Signaling by SOCS3: Characterization of the Mode of Inhibition and the Basis of Its Specificity

    Jeffrey J Babon;Nadia J Kershaw;Nadia J Kershaw;James M Murphy;James M Murphy;Leila N Varghese;Leila N Varghese

  • Necroptosis and ferroptosis are alternative cell death pathways that operate in acute kidney failure.

    Tammo Müller;Christin Dewitz;Jessica Schmitz;Anna Sophia Schröder

  • SOCS3 binds specific receptor–JAK complexes to control cytokine signaling by direct kinase inhibition

    Nadia J Kershaw;James M Murphy;James M Murphy;Nicholas P D Liau;Nicholas P D Liau;Leila N Varghese;Leila N Varghese

  • MK2 Phosphorylates RIPK1 to Prevent TNF-Induced Cell Death

    Isabel Jaco;Alessandro Annibaldi;Najoua Lalaoui;Najoua Lalaoui;Rebecca Wilson

  • A robust methodology to subclassify pseudokinases based on their nucleotide-binding properties.

    James M. Murphy;James M. Murphy;Qingwei Zhang;Samuel N. Young;Michael L. Reese

  • MLKL trafficking and accumulation at the plasma membrane control the kinetics and threshold for necroptosis

    Andre L Samson;Andre L Samson;Ying Zhang;Ying Zhang;Niall D Geoghegan;Niall D Geoghegan;Xavier J Gavin

  • TNFR1-dependent cell death drives inflammation in Sharpin-deficient mice

    James A Rickard;Holly Anderton;Nima Etemadi;Ueli Nachbur

  • Regulated necrosis in kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury.

    Aspasia Pefanis;Francesco L. Ierino;James M. Murphy;Peter J. Cowan;Peter J. Cowan

  • Transferrin receptor 1 is a reticulocyte-specific receptor for Plasmodium vivax

    Jakub Gruszczyk;Usheer Kanjee;Li Jin Chan;Li Jin Chan;Sébastien Menant

  • Understanding the Roles of FAK in Cancer Inhibitors, Genetic Models, and New Insights

    Hyunho Yoon;Joshua P. Dehart;James M. Murphy;Ssang-Taek Steve Lim

  • cIAPs and XIAP regulate myelopoiesis through cytokine production in an RIPK1- And RIPK3-dependent manner

    W. Wei-Lynn Wong;W. Wei-Lynn Wong;W. Wei-Lynn Wong;James E. Vince;James E. Vince;Najoua Lalaoui;Najoua Lalaoui;Kate E. Lawlor;Kate E. Lawlor

  • Author response: TNFR1-dependent cell death drives inflammation in Sharpin-deficient mice

    James A Rickard;James A Rickard;Holly Anderton;Holly Anderton;Nima Etemadi;Nima Etemadi;Ueli Nachbur;Ueli Nachbur

Frequent Co-Authors

John Silke
John Silke Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Peter E. Czabotar
Peter E. Czabotar Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Andrew I. Webb
Andrew I. Webb Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Jeffrey J. Babon
Jeffrey J. Babon Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Warren S. Alexander
Warren S. Alexander Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Marnie E. Blewitt
Marnie E. Blewitt Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Nicos A. Nicola
Nicos A. Nicola Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
James E. Vince
James E. Vince Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Guillaume Lessene
Guillaume Lessene Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
David L. Vaux
David L. Vaux Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology opens doors to a wide range of related online degrees and career pathways, especially for those interested in the intersections of science and human health. Many students choose to complement their biological studies with an advanced understanding of psychology or counseling, which can enhance both research and patient-care careers.

For those seeking flexibility, a masters in psychology online provides a strong foundation in behavioral science and mental processes. This path is valuable for graduates looking to blend molecular biology knowledge with psychological insights in healthcare or research settings.

Students interested in mental health can consider an online masters in clinical mental health counseling. This program builds counseling skills that are highly applicable to roles in hospitals, public health, and therapy.

The field of careers in forensic psychology is another option, combining biological knowledge with forensic investigation in legal or law enforcement settings. Alternatively, a specialization such as child psychology masters programs online can prepare graduates for impactful work focusing on the mental development of children and teens.

Best Scientists Citing James M. Murphy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles