World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 50 2566 2318 60 57 121 9726

Andrew I. Webb publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew I. Webb between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew I. Webb published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2021. 12 of the 153 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2021. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications
2000 2025

153 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew I. Webb: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 6
2005 6
2006 0
2007 1
2008 4
2009 0
2010 1
2011 3
2012 0
2013 6
2014 7
2015 4
2016 7
2017 7
2018 19
2019 14
2020 17
2021 25
2022 7
2023 4
2024 7
2025 5
Total 153
Download as CSV

Andrew I. Webb publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew I. Webb sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 117–126 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 121 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177 121
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew I. Webb D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew I. Webb sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130 50
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew I. Webb is affiliated with the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research in Australia. Their research spans multiple disciplines within the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Medicine. The scientist has contributed to 79 publications in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology and 46 in Medicine, with significant focus on several subfields such as Molecular Biology, Immunology, Spectroscopy, Oncology, and Hematology.

Their main research topics include:

  • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Interferon and immune responses
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Extracellular vesicles in disease

Andrew I. Webb has authored several recent papers in renowned journals, highlighting ongoing contributions to the scientific community. Key publications include:

  • "Targeting histone acetylation dynamics and oncogenic transcription by catalytic P300/CBP inhibition," published in 2021 in Molecular Cell
  • "Person-Specific Biomolecular Coronas Modulate Nanoparticle Interactions with Immune Cells in Human Blood," published in 2020 in ACS Nano
  • "ROCK-mediated selective activation of PERK signalling causes fibroblast reprogramming and tumour progression through a CRELD2-dependent mechanism," published in 2020 in Nature Cell Biology
  • "Cytotoxic T cells swarm by homotypic chemokine signalling," published in 2020 in eLife
  • "Conformational interconversion of MLKL and disengagement from RIPK3 precede cell death by necroptosis," published in 2021 in Nature Communications

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Andrew I. Webb include:

  • Jarrod J. Sandow
  • Laura F. Dagley
  • James M. Murphy
  • Giuseppe Infusini
  • Samuel N. Young

Andrew I. Webb has published extensively in several venues with multiple works appearing in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), where they have 13 publications. Other notable journals featuring their work include Nature Communications (3 publications), Nature Cell Biology (2 publications), The EMBO Journal (2 publications), and the Journal of Neuro-Oncology (2 publications).

Best Publications

  • The Pseudokinase MLKL Mediates Necroptosis via a Molecular Switch Mechanism

    James M. Murphy;Peter E. Czabotar;Peter E. Czabotar;Joanne M. Hildebrand;Joanne M. Hildebrand;Isabelle S. Lucet

  • Linear ubiquitination prevents inflammation and regulates immune signalling

    Bjã¶rn Gerlach;Stefanie M. Cordier;Anna C. Schmukle;Christoph H. Emmerich;Christoph H. Emmerich

  • Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide therapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

    J S Waters;A Webb;D Cunningham;P A Clarke

  • Activation of the pseudokinase MLKL unleashes the four-helix bundle domain to induce membrane localization and necroptotic cell death

    Joanne M. Hildebrand;Maria C. Tanzer;Isabelle S. Lucet;Isabelle S. Lucet;Samuel N. Young

  • CIS is a potent checkpoint in NK cell–mediated tumor immunity

    Rebecca B. Delconte;Tatiana B Kolesnik;Laura F. Dagley;Laura F. Dagley;Jai Rautela;Jai Rautela

  • Familial autoinflammation with neutrophilic dermatosis reveals a regulatory mechanism of pyrin activation

    Seth L. Masters;Seth L. Masters;Vasiliki Lagou;Isabelle Jéru;Isabelle Jéru;Paul J. Baker;Paul J. Baker

  • A type III effector antagonizes death receptor signalling during bacterial gut infection

    Jaclyn S Pearson;Cristina Giogha;Sze Ying Ong;Catherine Lydia Kennedy

  • EspL is a bacterial cysteine protease effector that cleaves RHIM proteins to block necroptosis and inflammation

    Jaclyn S. Pearson;Cristina Giogha;Sabrina Mühlen;Ueli Nachbur

  • Lack of prominent peptide-major histocompatibility complex features limits repertoire diversity in virus-specific CD8+ T cell populations.

    Stephen John Turner;Katherine Kedzierska;Helen Komodromou;Nicole Louise La Gruta

  • Conformational switching of the pseudokinase domain promotes human MLKL tetramerization and cell death by necroptosis.

    Emma J. Petrie;Emma J. Petrie;Jarrod J. Sandow;Jarrod J. Sandow;Annette V. Jacobsen;Annette V. Jacobsen;Brian J. Smith

  • A RIPK2 inhibitor delays NOD signalling events yet prevents inflammatory cytokine production

    Ueli Nachbur;Che A Stafford;Aleksandra Bankovacki;Yifan Zhan

  • VDAC2 enables BAX to mediate apoptosis and limit tumor development.

    Hui San Chin;Hui San Chin;Mark X. Li;Mark X. Li;Iris K. L. Tan;Robert L. Ninnis;Robert L. Ninnis

  • A class of γδ T cell receptors recognize the underside of the antigen-presenting molecule MR1

    Jérôme Le Nours;Jérôme Le Nours;Nicholas A. Gherardin;Nicholas A. Gherardin;Sri H. Ramarathinam;Wael Awad

  • Necroptosis signalling is tuned by phosphorylation of MLKL residues outside the pseudokinase domain activation loop

    Maria C Tanzer;Maria C Tanzer;Anne Tripaydonis;Anne Tripaydonis;Andrew I Webb;Andrew I Webb;Samuel N Young

  • Elucidating the mitochondrial proteome of Toxoplasma gondii reveals the presence of a divergent cytochrome c oxidase.

    Azadeh Seidi;Linden S Muellner-Wong;Esther Rajendran;Edwin T Tjhin

  • Targeting histone acetylation dynamics and oncogenic transcription by catalytic P300/CBP inhibition

    Simon J. Hogg;Simon J. Hogg;Olga Motorna;Leonie A. Cluse;Timothy M. Johanson;Timothy M. Johanson

  • Viral MLKL Homologs Subvert Necroptotic Cell Death by Sequestering Cellular RIPK3.

    Emma J. Petrie;Emma J. Petrie;Jarrod J. Sandow;Jarrod J. Sandow;Wil I.L. Lehmann;Wil I.L. Lehmann;Lung-Yu Liang;Lung-Yu Liang

  • Structure of Plasmodium falciparum Rh5–CyRPA–Ripr invasion complex

    Wilson Wong;Wilson Wong;Rick Huang;Sebastien Menant;Chuan Hong

  • The Structure of H-2Kb and Kbm8 Complexed to a Herpes Simplex Virus Determinant: Evidence for a Conformational Switch That Governs T Cell Repertoire Selection and Viral Resistance

    Andrew Ian Webb;Natalie A Borg;Michelle Anne Dunstone;Lars Kjer-Nielsen

  • Familial Autoinflammation with Neutrophilic Dermatosis Reveals a Novel Regulatory Mechanism of Pyrin Activation

    P. J. Baker;V. Lagou;I. Jeru;L. Van Eyck

Frequent Co-Authors

James M. Murphy
James M. Murphy Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
John Silke
John Silke Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Peter E. Czabotar
Peter E. Czabotar Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Anthony W. Purcell
Anthony W. Purcell Monash University
Jamie Rossjohn
Jamie Rossjohn Monash University
Sandra E. Nicholson
Sandra E. Nicholson Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Christopher J. Tonkin
Christopher J. Tonkin Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Nicos A. Nicola
Nicos A. Nicola Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Grant Dewson
Grant Dewson Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Warren S. Alexander
Warren S. Alexander Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're passionate about Molecular Biology, there are several online degree and career pathways that can complement or enhance your expertise. Some graduates pursue social work master programs online to merge their science background with community health roles, bridging the gap between biology and hands-on support services.

Others may explore an accelerated psychology degree online, which can be valuable for molecular biologists interested in behavioral science or research roles that investigate the biological basis of mental processes.

Specializing further, an online masters mental health counseling is an option for those wishing to combine molecular biology with clinical knowledge, building rewarding careers in healthcare or wellness settings.

For those curious about the intersection of law and biology, exploring how much do forensic psychologists make can help you discover alternative career trajectories where molecular knowledge aids in solving complex criminal or civil cases.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew I. Webb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles