World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 58 3839 3537 189 180 283 15269

Mike Rinck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mike Rinck between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mike Rinck published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2018. 15 of the 305 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2018. 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 3 publications
1992 2025

305 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mike Rinck: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 3
1993 2
1994 2
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 2
1999 7
2000 4
2001 3
2002 3
2003 8
2004 4
2005 7
2006 6
2007 8
2008 7
2009 13
2010 15
2011 13
2012 10
2013 20
2014 13
2015 17
2016 15
2017 14
2018 26
2019 13
2020 9
2021 16
2022 18
2023 9
2024 12
2025 3
Total 305
Download as CSV

Mike Rinck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Rinck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 283 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 283
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mike Rinck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Rinck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 58
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mike Rinck is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of Psychology, with a particular focus on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology. Their work spans a variety of subfields including Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's research topics cover a broad range within behavioral and mental health areas. Key themes include anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Other notable areas of study encompass behavioral health and interventions, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health research topics, perfectionism, procrastination, anxiety studies, behavioral and psychological studies, and cultural differences and values.

Mike Rinck's frequently published venues demonstrate a concentration in behavior therapy and addictive behaviors, appearing multiple times in:

  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research

Co-authorship collaborations are notable with several researchers, including:

  • Eni S. Becker
  • Reínout W. Wiers
  • Johannes Lindenmeyer
  • Anke M. Klein
  • Janna N. Vrijsen

Recent publications by Mike Rinck reflect their involvement in studies related to cognitive and emotional processes in psychopathology and behavioral interventions:

  • "Face masks impair facial emotion recognition and induce specific emotion confusions," 2022, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • "Biased approach-avoidance tendencies in psychopathology: A systematic review of their assessment and modification," 2020, Clinical Psychology Review (co-authored by Anke Loijen)
  • "Does comorbid anxiety or depression moderate effects of approach bias modification in the treatment of alcohol use disorders?" 2021, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (co-authored by Elske Salemink)
  • "How pre-processing decisions affect the reliability and validity of the approach-avoidance task: Evidence from simulations and multiverse analyses with six datasets," 2023, Behavior Research Methods (co-authored by Sercan Kahveci)
  • "Approach-Bias Retraining and Other Training Interventions as Add-On in the Treatment of AUD Patients," 2023, Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences (co-authored by Reínout W. Wiers)

Best Publications

  • Retraining Automatic Action Tendencies Changes Alcoholic Patients’ Approach Bias for Alcohol and Improves Treatment Outcome

    Reinout W. Wiers;Carolin Eberl;Mike Rinck;Eni S. Becker

  • Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders.

    Mike Rinck;Eni S. Becker

  • Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers

    Reinout W. Wiers;Mike Rinck;Robert Kordts;Katrijn Houben

  • Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: Do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best?

    Carolin Eberl;Reinout W. Wiers;Steffen Pawelczack;Mike Rinck

  • Avoidance of emotional facial expressions in social anxiety: The Approach–Avoidance Task

    Kathrin Heuer;Mike Rinck;Eni S. Becker

  • Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele.

    R.W.H.J. Wiers;M. Rinck;M. Dictus;E. van den Wildenberg

  • Emotion simulation during language comprehension

    David A. Havas;Arthur M. Glenberg;Mike Rinck

  • Emotional and Temporal Aspects of Situation Model Processing during Text Comprehension: An Event-Related fMRI Study

    Evelyn C. Ferstl;Mike Rinck;D. Yves Von Cramon

  • The emotional Stroop effect in anxiety disorders: General emotionality or disorder specificity?

    Eni S Becker;Mike Rinck;Jürgen Margraf;Walton T Roth

  • Spider fearful individuals attend to threat, then quickly avoid it: evidence from eye movements.

    Mike Rinck;Eni S. Becker

  • Epidemiology of specific phobia subtypes: Findings from the Dresden Mental Health Study

    Eni S. Becker;Mike Rinck;Veneta Türke;Petra Kause

  • A comparison of attentional biases and memory biases in women with social phobia and major depression.

    Mike Rinck;Eni S. Becker

  • Speeded detection and increased distraction in fear of spiders: evidence from eye movements.

    Mike Rinck;Andrea Reinecke;Thomas Ellwart;Kathrin Heuer

  • Chapter 16 – Eye Movement Measures to Study Global Text Processing

    Jukka Hyönä;Robert F. Lorch;Mike Rinck

  • Gaze direction differentially affects avoidance tendencies to happy and angry faces in socially anxious individuals

    Karin Roelofs;Peter Putman;Sonja Schouten;Wolf-Gero Lange

  • Anaphora Resolution and the Focus of Attention in Situation Models

    M. Rinck;G.H. Bower

  • Effects of Cognitive Bias Modification Training on Neural Alcohol Cue Reactivity in Alcohol Dependence

    Corinde E Wiers;Christine Stelzel;Thomas Edward Gladwin;Soyoung Q Park

  • Relapse prevention in abstinent alcoholics by cognitive bias modification: Clinical effects of combining approach bias modification and attention bias modification

    Mike Rinck;Reinout W Wiers;Eni S Becker;Johannes Lindenmeyer

  • Don’t Worry and Beware of White Bears: Thought Suppression in Anxiety Patients

    Eni S. Becker;Mike Rinck;Walton T. Roth;Jürgen Margraf

  • Mental Models and Narrative Comprehension: Some Qualifications

    Stephanie Gray Wilson;Mike Rinck;Timothy P. McNamara;Gordon H. Bower

Frequent Co-Authors

Eni S. Becker
Eni S. Becker Radboud University
Gordon H. Bower
Gordon H. Bower Stanford University
Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Jürgen Margraf
Jürgen Margraf Ruhr University Bochum
Walton T. Roth
Walton T. Roth Stanford University
Arthur M. Glenberg
Arthur M. Glenberg Arizona State University
Ger P. J. Keijsers
Ger P. J. Keijsers Radboud University
Jürgen Hoyer
Jürgen Hoyer TU Dresden
Daniel A. Fitzgerald
Daniel A. Fitzgerald University of Illinois at Chicago
Susan M. Bögels
Susan M. Bögels University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online degrees in psychology open doors to a variety of dynamic career paths, especially as mental health awareness grows worldwide. Students considering a specialization have a range of options, such as child and adolescent, cognitive, and counseling psychology.

Those drawn to supporting young people can explore roles in schools, clinics, or research by investigating the child and adolescent psychology job outlook. Salary expectations, a key consideration, can be found in current trends for child psychology salary, which shed light on earning potential across different settings.

For those interested in brain function, decision-making, and learning processes, cognitive psychology career options span roles in research, healthcare, education, and even technology. If your passion is helping others through therapy or guidance, there are plenty of counseling psychology jobs available, ranging from private practice to corporate wellness.

No matter the focus, online psychology degrees allow flexible learning and connect graduates to rewarding careers in both traditional and emerging fields.

Best Scientists Citing Mike Rinck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles