World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
86
Citations
35184
World Ranking
761
National Ranking
407

Zohar Manna publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zohar Manna sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 269 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Zohar Manna D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zohar Manna sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - ACM Fellow
  • 1981 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Zohar Manna is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Throughout their career, they have been recognized with prestigious awards, including the ACM Fellow designation in 1994 and the Fellowship of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1981.

While specific publications and research topics are not enumerated here, Manna's professional background places them in a context of significant contributions to computer science and related areas. Their association with Stanford University suggests involvement in advanced computational research and academic activities within one of the leading institutions globally.

Their recognition by the ACM signifies notable contributions to the computing field, as this fellowship is awarded to individuals who have achieved excellence in the areas of computer science and engineering.

The Guggenheim Fellowship awarded in 1981 further indicates that Manna's work has garnered attention beyond purely academic circles, supporting scholarship that advances knowledge in their field.

Best Publications

  • The temporal logic of reactive and concurrent systems

    Zohar Manna;Amir Pnueli

  • The Temporal Logic of Reactive and Concurrent Systems: Specification

    Amir Pnueli;Zohar Manna

  • Temporal Verification of Reactive Systems: Safety

    Zohar Manna;Amir Pnueli

  • Temporal Verification of Reactive Systems

    Zohar Manna;Amir Pnueli

  • Mathematical Theory of Computation

    Zohar Manna

  • The temporal logic of branching time

    Mordechai Ben-Ari;Amir Pnueli;Zohar Manna

  • A Deductive Approach to Program Synthesis

    Zohar Manna;Richard Waldinger

  • Synthesis of communicating processes from temporal logic specifications

    Zohar Manna;Pierre Wolper

  • Proving termination with multiset orderings

    Nachum Dershowitz;Zohar Manna

  • From Timed to Hybrid Systems

    Oded Maler;Zohar Manna;Zohar Manna;Amir Pnueli

  • Formal verification of probabilistic systems

    Zohar Manna;Luca De Alfaro

  • Verification of concurrent programs, Part I: The temporal framework

    Z Manna;Amir Pnueli

  • The Calculus of Computation: Decision Procedures with Applications to Verification

    Aaron R. Bradley;Zohar Manna

  • Timed Transition Systems

    Thomas A. Henzinger;Zohar Manna;Zohar Manna;Amir Pnueli

  • What Good Are Digital Clocks

    Thomas A. Henzinger;Zohar Manna;Amir Pnueli

  • What's decidable about arrays?

    Aaron R. Bradley;Zohar Manna;Henny B. Sipma

  • Toward automatic program synthesis

    Zohar Manna;Richard J. Waldinger

  • Non-linear loop invariant generation using Gröbner bases

    Sriram Sankaranarayanan;Henny B. Sipma;Zohar Manna

  • The logical basis for computer programming. Volume 1: deductive reasoning

    Zohar Manna;Richard Waldinger

  • LOLA: runtime monitoring of synchronous systems

    B. D'Angelo;S. Sankaranarayanan;C. Sanchez;W. Robinson

  • The temporal logic of branching time

    Mordechai Ben-Ari;Zohar Manna;Amir Pnueli

Frequent Co-Authors

Henny B. Sipma
Henny B. Sipma Aarno Labs
Amir Pnueli
Amir Pnueli Weizmann Institute of Science
Sriram Sankaranarayanan
Sriram Sankaranarayanan University of Colorado Boulder
Nikolaj Bjørner
Nikolaj Bjørner Microsoft (United States)
Bernd Finkbeiner
Bernd Finkbeiner Saarland University
Thomas A. Henzinger
Thomas A. Henzinger Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Nachum Dershowitz
Nachum Dershowitz Tel Aviv University
Luca de Alfaro
Luca de Alfaro University of California, Santa Cruz
Martín Abadi
Martín Abadi Google (United States)
Adi Shamir
Adi Shamir Weizmann Institute of Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens up multiple educational and career pathways, both online and on campus. Many students wonder, what masters program should I do to enhance my skills or boost my job prospects? A graduate degree can lead to advanced roles in fields such as artificial intelligence, data science, and software engineering.

If you’re just beginning or want a cost-effective head start, consider an online associate's degree in computer science or IT. These degrees provide foundational knowledge that can lead to entry-level positions or smooth transitions to bachelor’s programs.

Affordability is a key concern for many prospective students. There are cheap online college classes available, letting you complete essential coursework or prerequisites without the high costs of traditional education.

For students with less competitive transcripts, there are also reputable universities for low gpa. These options provide accessible entry points to higher education and rewarding careers in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Zohar Manna

Recently Published Articles