World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 66 7143 6472 93 84 160 30355

Martin Billeter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Billeter between 1964 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Billeter published across 58 years, from 1964 to 2021, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 1991. 1 of the 245 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 1991. 1964: 5 publications 1965: 2 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 5 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 12 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1964 2021

245 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Billeter: publications per year, 1964 to 2021
Year Publications
1964 5
1965 2
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 2
1970 2
1971 1
1972 0
1973 3
1974 3
1975 1
1976 5
1977 1
1978 3
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 3
1984 7
1985 3
1986 2
1987 5
1988 8
1989 12
1990 4
1991 14
1992 9
1993 8
1994 7
1995 10
1996 11
1997 11
1998 11
1999 11
2000 10
2001 8
2002 6
2003 6
2004 6
2005 5
2006 2
2007 4
2008 3
2009 6
2010 0
2011 2
2012 5
2013 3
2014 2
2015 2
2016 3
2017 2
2018 0
2019 2
2020 0
2021 1
Total 245
Download as CSV

Martin Billeter publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Billeter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 160 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 160
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Billeter D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Billeter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775 66
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin Billeter is a researcher affiliated with the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. Their work spans multiple fields within the broader domains of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, physics, astronomy, and medicine.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Medicine

Subfields of study where Martin Billeter has contributed are:

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry

Their research topics focus primarily on areas such as:

  • NMR spectroscopy and applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
  • Enzyme Structure and Function

Martin Billeter has contributed to the field of magnetic resonance, with publications appearing in relevant professional venues. Notably, their recent paper titled "NUScon: a community-driven platform for quantitative evaluation of nonuniform sampling in NMR" was published in 2021 in the journal Magnetic Resonance. This paper has garnered citations, indicating engagement within the scientific community.

Collaborations with frequent co-authors indicate a network of interaction with other researchers, including:

  • Yulia Pustovalova
  • Frank Delaglio
  • D. Levi Craft
  • Haribabu Arthanari
  • Ad Bax

Best Publications

  • MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures.

    Reto Koradi;Martin Billeter;Kurt Wüthrich

  • The program XEASY for computer-supported NMR spectral analysis of biological macromolecules.

    Christian Bartels;Tai-he Xia;Martin Billeter;Peter Güntert

  • Pseudo-structures for the 20 common amino acids for use in studies of protein conformations by measurements of intramolecular proton-proton distance constraints with nuclear magnetic resonance.

    K. Wüthrich;M. Billeter;Werner Braun

  • NMR Solution Structure of the Human Prion Protein

    Ralph Zahn;Aizhuo Liu;Thorsten Lührs;Roland Riek

  • Calibration of the angular dependence of the amide proton-Cα proton coupling constants, 3JHNα, in a globular protein: Use of 3JHNα for identification of helical secondary structure

    A. Pardi;M. Billeter;K. Wüthrich

  • Polypeptide secondary structure determination by nuclear magnetic resonance observation of short proton-proton distances.

    Kurt Wüthrich;Martin Billeter;Werner Braun

  • Homeodomain-DNA recognition

    Walter J. Gehring;Yan Qiu Qian;Martin Billeter;Katsuo Furukubo-Tokunaga

  • Sequential resonance assignments in protein 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra: Computation of sterically allowed proton-proton distances and statistical analysis of proton-proton distances in single crystal protein conformations

    Martin Billeter;Werner Braun;Kurt Wüthrich

  • The structure of the Antennapedia homeodomain determined by NMR spectroscopy in solution: comparison with prokaryotic repressors.

    Y.Q. Qian;M. Billeter;G. Otting;M. Müller

  • NMR determination of residual structure in a urea-denatured protein, the 434-repressor.

    Dario Neri;Martin Billeter;Gerhard Wider;Kurt Wüthrich

  • Protein--DNA contacts in the structure of a homeodomain--DNA complex determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in solution.

    G. Otting;Yan Qiu Qian;M. Billeter;M. Müller

  • Determination of the nuclear magnetic resonance solution structure of an Antennapedia homeodomain-DNA complex.

    Martin Billeter;Yan Qiu Qian;Gottfried Otting;Martin Müller

  • Prion protein NMR structure and familial human spongiform encephalopathies

    Roland Riek;Gerhard Wider;Martin Billeter;Simone Hornemann

  • Automated stereospecific 1H NMR assignments and their impact on the precision of protein structure determinations in solution

    Peter Güntert;Werner Braun;Martin Billeter;Kurt Wüthrich

  • The structure of the homeodomain and its functional implications.

    W.J. Gehring;M. Müller;M. Affolter;A. Percival-Smith

  • Efficient analysis of protein 2D NMR spectra using the software package EASY.

    Craig Eccles;Peter Güntert;Martin Billeter;Kurt Wüthrich

  • NMR studies of Brownian tumbling and internal motions in proteins

    D.M. Korzhnev;M. Billeter;A.S. Arseniev;V.Y. Orekhov

  • Point-centered domain decomposition for parallel molecular dynamics simulation

    R Koradi;M Billeter;P Güntert

  • Optimizing resolution in multidimensional NMR by three-way decomposition.

    Vladislav Yu. Orekhov;Ilghiz Ibraghimov;Martin Billeter

  • Prion protein NMR structure and species barrier for prion diseases

    Martin Billeter;Roland Riek;Gerhard Wider;Simone Hornemann

  • Comparison of the high-resolution structures of the α-amylase inhibitor tendamistat determined by nuclear magnetic resonance in solution and by X-ray diffraction in single crystals

    Martin Billeter;Allen D. Kline;Werner Braun;Robert Huber

  • GARANT : A GENERAL ALGORITHM FOR RESONANCE ASSIGNMENT OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTRA

    Christian Bartels;Peter Güntert;Martin Billeter;Kurt Wüthrich

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt Wüthrich
Kurt Wüthrich ETH Zurich
Gottfried Otting
Gottfried Otting Australian National University
Peter Güntert
Peter Güntert ETH Zurich
Roland Riek
Roland Riek ETH Zurich
Walter J. Gehring
Walter J. Gehring University of Basel
Werner Braun
Werner Braun The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Alexander S. Arseniev
Alexander S. Arseniev Russian Academy of Sciences
Charles Weissmann
Charles Weissmann University of Florida
Severo Ochoa
Severo Ochoa Roche Institute of Molecular Biology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields that blend science and practical application. Many students consider careers in healthcare, forensic science, or psychology, each offering distinct pathways and educational requirements.

For those interested in healthcare, understanding how much does it cost to become a pharmacist is crucial when planning your education. Pharmacy programs can be costly, but they pave the way for well-compensated and stable careers in medicine.

If you are drawn to forensic science, exploring forensic science degree online options is a smart step. Many affordable programs provide flexibility and specialized training to prepare you for roles in crime labs and investigative agencies.

Another niche worth considering is forensic psychology, where graduate study plays a vital role. Investigate forensic psychology graduate programs online to find programs that match your career goals, combining psychology with legal system expertise.

For hands-on technical positions, autopsy technician careers offer a unique blend of science and investigative work. Understanding how much do autopsy techs make can help you gauge the financial prospects of this specialized field.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Billeter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles