World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
14817
World Ranking
6045
National Ranking
3283

Sandra Scarr publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Scarr sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Sandra Scarr D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Scarr sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sandra Scarr is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a focus on scientific research with an emphasis on maintaining a consistent institutional association.

Although recent papers and frequent co-authors are not listed, the profile indicates no recorded publications in specific journals or conference venues. Additionally, there is no data regarding main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics connected to their work.

No book publications have been documented, which suggests the scholar's contributions might be concentrated in formats or venues not captured in this data.

The absence of awards information indicates that there are no recorded recognitions linked to this scientist within the available dataset.

Best Publications

  • How people make their own environments: a theory of genotype greater than environment effects.

    Sandra Scarr;Kathleen McCartney

  • Developmental theories for the 1990s: development and individual differences.

    Sandra Scarr

  • Parenting stress among dual-earner mothers and fathers: Are there gender differences?

    Kirby Deater-Deckard;Sandra Scarr

  • Within and Beyond the Classroom Door: Assessing Quality in Child Care Centers.

    Deborah Phillips;Debra Mekos;Sandra Scarr;Kathleen McCartney

  • Child-care quality and children's social development.

    Deborah Phillips;Kathleen McCartney;Sandra Scarr

  • Measurement of quality in child care centers

    Sandra Scarr;Marlene Eisenberg;Kirby Deater-Deckard

  • IQ test performance of Black children adopted by White families.

    Sandra Scarr;Richard A. Weinberg

  • Constructing psychology: Making facts and fables for our times.

    Sandra Scarr

  • The Influence of "Family Background" on Intellectual Attainment

    Unknown

  • Graduate Training in Statistics, Methodology, and Measurement in Psychology: A Survey of PhD Programs in North America

    Leona S. Aiken;Stephen G. West;Lee Sechrest;Raymond R. Reno

  • Biological and Cultural Diversity: The Legacy of Darwin for Development.

    Sandra Scarr

  • Child care research: issues, perspectives, and results.

    Sandra Scarr;Marlene Eisenberg

  • Twin method: Defense of a critical assumption

    Unknown

  • American child care today.

    Sandra Scarr

  • Race and gender as psychological variables: social and ethical issues

    S. Scarr

  • Working mothers and their families

    S. Scarr;D. Phillips;K. Mccartney

  • The reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist.

    Sandra Scarr;Barbara L. R. Weber

  • Personality resemblance among adolescents and their parents in biologically related and adoptive families.

    Unknown

  • How people make their own environments: Implications for parents and policy makers.

    Unknown

  • The Minnesota transracial adoption study: A follow-up of IQ test performance at adolescence

    Richard A. Weinberg;Sandra Scarr;Irwin D. Waldman

  • Genetic and Environmental Influences on Vocational Interests Assessed Using Adoptive and Biological Families and Twins Reared Apart and Together

    Deborah G. Betsworth;Deborah G. Betsworth;Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.;Catherine R. Cooper;Harold D. Grotevant

  • Family Racial Socialization and Ecological Competence: Longitudinal Assessments of African-American Transracial Adoptees.

    Kimberly M. DeBerry;Sandra Scarr;Richard Weinberg

  • Child Care Quality and Children's Behavioral Adjustment: A Four‐Year Longitudinal Study

    Kirby Deater-Deckard;Relana Pinkerton;Sandra Scarr

  • Day care as intervention: Comparisons of varying quality programs

    Kathleen McCartney;Sandra Scarr;Deborah Phillips;Susan Grajek

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathleen McCartney
Kathleen McCartney Harvard University
Deborah A. Phillips
Deborah A. Phillips Georgetown University
Irwin D. Waldman
Irwin D. Waldman Emory University
Harold D. Grotevant
Harold D. Grotevant University of Massachusetts Amherst
Kirby Deater-Deckard
Kirby Deater-Deckard University of Massachusetts Amherst
Stephen G. West
Stephen G. West Arizona State University
Thomas J. Bouchard
Thomas J. Bouchard University of Minnesota
Henry L. Roediger
Henry L. Roediger Washington University in St. Louis
Alan E. Kazdin
Alan E. Kazdin Yale University
Leona S. Aiken
Leona S. Aiken Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens a variety of online education options and career paths in mental health. Many students interested in counseling, therapy, or clinical work are now considering online programs for the flexibility they offer, especially as educational requirements can vary depending on your location.

The pathway to becoming a licensed therapist is different across states and cities. For example, if you’re interested in becoming a licensed therapist in Mesa, make sure your online degree aligns with Arizona’s licensing standards. Similarly, those exploring Miami licensed therapist education requirements should be aware of Florida’s specific criteria.

Choosing the right online psychology program should also take into account the steps needed for licensure in places like Wisconsin and Minnesota. Research Milwaukee licensed therapist education requirements or discover the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Minneapolis to make sure your graduate degree’s coursework and clinical hours will be accepted.

In summary, online psychology degrees provide flexibility, but students must verify that programs meet their state’s licensing standards before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra Scarr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles