World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
30504
World Ranking
2429
National Ranking
1409

Thomas J. Bouchard publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Bouchard sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 163 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Thomas J. Bouchard D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Bouchard sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas J. Bouchard is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Psychology, with multiple works spanning various subfields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Social Psychology.

The scientist has published papers covering a range of topics, including Cognitive Abilities and Testing, Child and Animal Learning Development, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs, and Mental Health Research Topics.

Several recent papers illustrate the scope of their work:

  • Keith Hayes' experience-producing drives: An appreciation and extension, 2020, Personality and Individual Differences
  • The Garden of Forking Paths; An Evaluation of Joseph's 'A Reevaluation of the 1990 "Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart" IQ Study', 2023, Twin Research and Human Genetics
  • Obituary: Frank Schmidt (1944-2021), 2021, Personality and Individual Differences

Their frequent coauthors include Wendy Johnson. The main publication venues in which Thomas J. Bouchard's research appears are Personality and Individual Differences and Twin Research and Human Genetics.

Through a combination of experimental and evaluative studies, their work addresses complex aspects of human cognitive and emotional development as well as behavior patterns from psychological and evolutionary perspectives.

Best Publications

  • Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns.

    Ulric Neisser;A. Wade Boykin;Nathan Brody;Stephen J. Ceci

  • Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together.

    Auke Tellegen;David T. Lykken;Thomas J. Bouchard;Kimerly J. Wilcox

  • Sources of human psychological differences: the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart.

    Thomas J. Bouchard;David T. Lykken;Matthew McGue;Nancy L. Segal

  • INTELLIGENCE : KNOWNS AND UNKNOWNS

    U. Neisser;G. Boodoo;T. J. Bouchard;A. W. Boykin

  • Genes, evolution, and personality.

    Thomas J. Bouchard;John C. Loehlin

  • Familial Studies of Intelligence: A Review

    Thomas J. Bouchard;Matthew McGue

  • Job Satisfaction: Environmental and Genetic Components

    Richard D. Arvey;Thomas J. Bouchard;Nancy L. Segal;Lauren M. Abraham

  • Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences.

    Thomas J. Bouchard;Matt McGue

  • Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex

    Matt McGue;Thomas J. Bouchard

  • Genes, Environment, and Personality

    Thomas J. Bouchard

  • Genetic Influence on Human Psychological Traits A Survey

    Thomas J. Bouchard

  • The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized

    Wendy Johnson;Thomas J. Bouchard

  • Behavioral genetics of cognitive ability: A life-span perspective.

    Matt McGue;Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.;William G. Iacono;David T. Lykken

  • Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups.

    Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.;Melana Hare

  • Early hormonal influences on cognitive functioning in congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

    Susan M. Resnick;Sheri A. Berenbaum;Irving I. Gottesman;Thomas J. Bouchard

  • Heritability of Substance Abuse and Antisocial Behavior: A Study of Monozygotic Twins Reared Apart

    William M. Grove;Elke D. Eckert;Leonard Heston;Thomas J. Bouchard

  • Just one g: consistent results from three test batteries

    Wendy Johnson;Thomas J Bouchard;Robert F Krueger;Matt McGue

  • The Minnesota twin family registry : some initial findings

    D. T. Lykken;T. J. Bouchard;M. Mcgue;A. Tellegen

  • Genetic and Environmental Influences on Religious Interests, Attitudes, and Values: A Study of Twins Reared Apart and Together

    Niels G. Waller;Brian A. Kojetin;Thomas J. Bouchard;David T. Lykken

  • Emergenesis: Genetic traits that may not run in families.

    David T. Lykken;Matt McGue;A. Tellegen;T. J. Bouchard

  • Still just 1 g: Consistent results from five test batteries

    Wendy Johnson;Jan te Nijenhuis;Thomas J. Bouchard

  • Intelligence, heredity, and environment

    Robert J. Sternberg;Elena L. Grigorenko

Frequent Co-Authors

Wendy Johnson
Wendy Johnson University of Edinburgh
Nancy L. Segal
Nancy L. Segal California State University, Fullerton
Matt McGue
Matt McGue University of Minnesota
David T. Lykken
David T. Lykken University of Minnesota
Auke Tellegen
Auke Tellegen University of Minnesota
Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Irving I. Gottesman
Irving I. Gottesman University of Minnesota
Richard D. Arvey
Richard D. Arvey National University of Singapore
Michael C. Neale
Michael C. Neale Virginia Commonwealth University
Niels G. Waller
Niels G. Waller University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to psychology can open doors to rewarding careers in counseling, mental health, and human services. As the job market continues to grow for licensed counselors and psychologists, choosing the right program becomes essential.

When selecting a degree, consider not only the reputation but also the value of the program. For example, if you’re looking at options in Utah, the top-ranked counseling degree programs in Utah provide robust training and strong outcomes for graduates. In Arizona, students benefit from the best value counseling degrees in Arizona, which combine quality with affordability.

Colorado’s best value counseling programs in Colorado are recognized for integrating practical experience with academic excellence. Meanwhile, those considering an education in Florida can refer to the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Florida for guidance.

Pursuing a psychology-related program online can give you flexible paths toward licensure and a career in counseling, therapy, or social work—positions that make a real impact on people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Bouchard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles