World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
40856
World Ranking
9947
National Ranking
4353

Adam J. Engler publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam J. Engler sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 225 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Adam J. Engler D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam J. Engler sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adam J. Engler is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology as well as Medicine. The main subfields Engler has contributed to are Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biomedical Engineering, with additional work in Oncology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
  • Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Congenital heart defects research

Adam J. Engler has published in a variety of scientific journals, with frequent contributions to venues such as:

  • APL Bioengineering
  • Cancer Research
  • Cell Reports
  • Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
  • Biomaterials

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Engler include:

  • "Matrix Rigidity Controls Epithelial-Mesenchymal Plasticity and Tumor Metastasis via a Mechanoresponsive EPHA2/LYN Complex," 2020, Developmental Cell
  • "Adhesion strength and contractility enable metastatic cells to become adurotactic," 2021, Cell Reports
  • "YAP silencing by RB1 mutation is essential for small-cell lung cancer metastasis," 2023, Nature Communications
  • "Getting physical: Material mechanics is an intrinsic cell cue," 2023, Cell Stem Cell
  • "Recent advancements and future requirements in vascularization of cortical organoids," 2022, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Benjamin Yeoman
  • Parag Katira
  • Natalie J. Kirkland
  • Gisselle Gonzalez
  • Pranjali Beri

Best Publications

  • Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification.

    Adam J. Engler;Shamik Sen;H. Lee Sweeney;Dennis E. Discher

  • Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments

    Adam J. Engler;Maureen A. Griffin;Shamik Sen;Carsten G. Bönnemann

  • Substrate Compliance versus Ligand Density in Cell on Gel Responses

    Adam Engler;Lucie Bacakova;Cynthia Newman;Alina Hategan

  • Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension

    Seunghan Oh;Karla S. Brammer;Y. S. Julie Li;Dayu Teng

  • Preparation of Hydrogel Substrates with Tunable Mechanical Properties

    Justin R. Tse;Adam J. Engler

  • Interplay of matrix stiffness and protein tethering in stem cell differentiation

    Jessica H. Wen;Ludovic G. Vincent;Alexander Fuhrmann;Yu Suk Choi;Yu Suk Choi

  • Materials as stem cell regulators

    William L. Murphy;Todd C. McDevitt;Adam J. Engler

  • Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating

    Adam J. Engler;Christine Carag-Krieger;Colin P. Johnson;Matthew Raab

  • Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation

    Gwendolen C. Reilly;Adam J. Engler

  • Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance

    Mark F. Berry;Adam J. Engler;Y. Joseph Woo;Timothy J. Pirolli

  • Matrix stiffness drives epithelial–mesenchymal transition and tumour metastasis through a TWIST1–G3BP2 mechanotransduction pathway

    Spencer C. Wei;Laurent Fattet;Jeff H. Tsai;Yurong Guo

  • Stiffness gradients mimicking in vivo tissue variation regulate mesenchymal stem cell fate.

    Justin R. Tse;Adam J. Engler

  • Stem cell migration and mechanotransduction on linear stiffness gradient hydrogels

    William J. Hadden;Jennifer L. Young;Andrew W. Holle;Andrew W. Holle;Meg L. McFetridge

  • Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment--implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery.

    Florian Rehfeldt;Adam J. Engler;Adam Eckhardt;Fariyal Ahmed

  • Surface probe measurements of the elasticity of sectioned tissue, thin gels and polyelectrolyte multilayer films : correlations between substrate stiffness and cell adhesion

    Adam J. Engler;Ludovic Richert;Joyce Y. Wong;Catherine Picart

  • Hydrogels with Time-Dependent Material Properties Enhance Cardiomyocyte Differentiation In Vitro

    Jennifer L. Young;Adam J. Engler

  • Recent Advances in Extrusion-Based 3D Printing for Biomedical Applications.

    Jesse K. Placone;Adam J. Engler

  • Power-Law Rheology of Isolated Nuclei with Deformation Mapping of Nuclear Substructures

    Kris Noel Dahl;Adam J. Engler;J. David Pajerowski;Dennis E. Discher

  • RAP2 mediates mechanoresponses of the Hippo pathway

    Zhipeng Meng;Yunjiang Qiu;Kimberly C. Lin;Aditya Kumar

  • Mesenchymal Stem Cell Durotaxis Depends on Substrate Stiffness Gradient Strength

    Ludovic G. Vincent;Yu Suk Choi;Baldomero Alonso-Latorre;Juan C. del Álamo

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis E. Discher
Dennis E. Discher University of Pennsylvania
Rolf Bodmer
Rolf Bodmer Discovery Institute
Giuseppe Battaglia
Giuseppe Battaglia Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia
Jean E. Schwarzbauer
Jean E. Schwarzbauer Princeton University
Bing Ren
Bing Ren New York Genome Center
Jennifer E. Van Eyk
Jennifer E. Van Eyk Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Shu Chien
Shu Chien University of California, San Diego
H. Lee Sweeney
H. Lee Sweeney University of Florida
Eric J. Topol
Eric J. Topol Scripps Research Institute
Shaochen Chen
Shaochen Chen University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Adam J. Engler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles