World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 46 6155 5908 2227 2064 109 7209

Guenter Engling publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Guenter Engling between 1994 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Guenter Engling published across 30 years, from 1994 to 2023, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2013. 1 of the 111 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2013. 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1994 2023

111 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Guenter Engling: publications per year, 1994 to 2023
Year Publications
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 3
2004 3
2005 1
2006 5
2007 0
2008 3
2009 3
2010 11
2011 6
2012 8
2013 13
2014 6
2015 6
2016 11
2017 7
2018 5
2019 5
2020 7
2021 4
2022 0
2023 1
Total 111
Download as CSV

Guenter Engling publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guenter Engling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 109 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492 109
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Guenter Engling D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guenter Engling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291 46
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Guenter Engling is affiliated with the Desert Research Institute in the United States. Their research primarily covers environmental science, with a significant focus on atmospheric science and related subfields such as health, toxicology and mutagenesis, automotive engineering, global and planetary change, and environmental engineering.

The main topics of their research include atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, air quality and health impacts, vehicle emissions and performance, air quality monitoring and forecasting, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, energy and environment impacts, and thermochemical biomass conversion processes.

Frequent publication venues where Guenter Engling has contributed include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Atmospheric Environment
  • Atmosphere
  • Chemosphere

They have co-authored multiple papers with several researchers, frequently collaborating with Linlin Liang, Chang Liu, Wanyun Xu, Xuyan Liu, and Gen Zhang.

Notable papers authored or co-authored by Guenter Engling include:

  • Measurement report: Chemical characteristics of PM 2.5 during typical biomass burning season at an agricultural site of the North China Plain, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Carbonaceous aerosol composition in air masses influenced by large-scale biomass burning: a case study in northwestern Vietnam, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Characteristics and determinants of personal exposure to PM2.5 mass and components in adult subjects in the megacity of Guangzhou, China, 2020, Atmospheric Environment
  • Improved biomass burning pollution in Beijing from 2011 to 2018, 2023, Atmospheric Environment
  • Carbonaceous Aerosol Emitted from Biofuel Household Stove Combustion in South China, 2020, Atmosphere

Guenter Engling's research emphasizes the chemical and physical characteristics of particulate matter, the impact of biomass burning on air quality, and the evaluation of emissions from various sources including biofuel combustion. Their work involves measurement campaigns and case studies in diverse geographic regions such as the North China Plain and northwestern Vietnam, contributing to the understanding of aerosol sources and air pollution dynamics.

Best Publications

  • Biomass burning contribution to Beijing aerosol

    Y. Cheng;G. Engling;K.-B. He;F.-K. Duan

  • Determination of levoglucosan in biomass combustion aerosol by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection

    Guenter Engling;Christian M. Carrico;Sonia M. Kreidenweis;Jeffrey L. Collett

  • Chemical composition of PM2.5 in an urban environment in Chengdu, China:Importance of springtime dust storms and biomass burning

    Jun Tao;Leiming Zhang;Guenter Engling;Renjian Zhang

  • The characteristics of brown carbon aerosol during winter in Beijing

    Yuan Cheng;Ke-bin He;Zhen-yu Du;Guenter Engling;Guenter Engling

  • Trace gas and particle emissions from domestic and industrial biofuel use and garbage burning in central Mexico

    T. J. Christian;R. J. Yokelson;B. Cardenas;Luisa Tan Molina

  • Organosulfates in Humic-like Substance Fraction Isolated from Aerosols at Seven Locations in East Asia: A Study by Ultra-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry

    Peng Lin;Jian Zhen Yu;Guenter Engling;Markus Kalberer

  • Size-Resolved Anhydrosugar Composition in Smoke Aerosol from Controlled Field Burning of Rice Straw

    Guenter Engling;James J. Lee;Yi-Wen Tsai;Shih-Chun C. Lung

  • Biogeography in the air: fungal diversity over land and oceans

    J. Fröhlich-Nowoisky;S. M. Burrows;Z. Xie;Z. Xie;G. Engling;G. Engling

  • A highly resolved anion-exchange chromatographic method for determination of saccharidic tracers for biomass combustion and primary bio-particles in atmospheric aerosol

    Yoshiteru Iinuma;Guenter Engling;Hans Puxbaum;Hartmut Herrmann

  • Humic-like substances in fresh emissions of rice straw burning and in ambient aerosols in the Pearl River Delta Region, China

    P. Lin;G. Engling;J. Z. Yu

  • Water uptake and chemical composition of fresh aerosols generated in open burning of biomass

    C. M. Carrico;M. D. Petters;M. D. Petters;S. M. Kreidenweis;A. P. Sullivan

  • Characterization and sources of aerosol particles over the southeastern Tibetan Plateau during the Southeast Asia biomass-burning season

    Guenter Engling;Guenter Engling;Yi-Nan Zhang;Chuen-Yu Chan;Xue-Fang Sang

  • Chemical speciation, transport and contribution of biomass burning smoke to ambient aerosol in Guangzhou, a mega city of China

    Zhisheng Zhang;Guenter Engling;Chuan-Yao Lin;Charles C.-K. Chou

  • Assessing the regional impact of indonesian biomass burning emissions based on organic molecular tracers and chemical mass balance modeling

    G. Engling;Jun He;R. Betha;R. Betha;R. Balasubramanian;R. Balasubramanian

  • Observation of elevated fungal tracers due to biomass burning in the Sichuan Basin at Chengdu City, China

    Yihong Yang;Chuen-yu Chan;Jun Tao;Mang Lin

  • Brown and black carbon in Beijing aerosol: Implications for the effects of brown coating on light absorption by black carbon

    Yuan Cheng;Ke-bin He;Guenter Engling;Rodney Weber

  • Contribution of fungal spores to particulate matter in a tropical rainforest

    Ting Zhang;Guenter Engling;Guenter Engling;Chuen-Yu Chan;Yi-Nan Zhang

  • The characteristics of Beijing aerosol during two distinct episodes: impacts of biomass burning and fireworks.

    Yuan Cheng;Guenter Engling;Ke-bin He;Feng-kui Duan

  • Aerosol hygroscopicity and cloud droplet activation of extracts of filters from biomass burning experiments

    Christian M. Carrico;Markus D. Petters;Sonia M. Kreidenweis;Jeffrey L. Collett

  • Characteristics and applications of size-segregated biomass burning tracers in China's Pearl River Delta region

    Zhisheng Zhang;Jian Gao;Guenter Engling;Guenter Engling;Jun Tao

  • Seasonal variations and source estimation of saccharides in atmospheric particulate matter in Beijing, China.

    Linlin Liang;Guenter Engling;Zhenyu Du;Yuan Cheng

  • Fluorescent bioaerosol particle, molecular tracer, and fungal spore concentrations during dry and rainy periods in a semi-arid forest

    Marie Ila Gosselin;Marie Ila Gosselin;Chathurika M. Rathnayake;Ian Crawford;Christopher Pöhlker

Frequent Co-Authors

Kebin He
Kebin He Tsinghua University
Jeffrey L. Collett
Jeffrey L. Collett Colorado State University
Sonia M. Kreidenweis
Sonia M. Kreidenweis Colorado State University
Pierre Herckes
Pierre Herckes Arizona State University
Fengkui Duan
Fengkui Duan Tsinghua University
Konstantinos Eleftheriadis
Konstantinos Eleftheriadis National Centre of Scientific Research Demokritos
Christian M. Carrico
Christian M. Carrico New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
William C. Malm
William C. Malm Colorado State University
Jiumeng Liu
Jiumeng Liu Harbin Institute of Technology
Kin-Fai Ho
Kin-Fai Ho Chinese University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related degree options can expand career opportunities. Affordable online programs make education more accessible, and many students consider an affordable online general studies degree as a flexible starting point that allows customization of course selections while maintaining cost-effectiveness.

Some learners may seek an easier entry into higher education. The easiest bachelor degree to get options often include programs with less intensive math or lab work, which might appeal to those balancing other commitments yet still wanting an environmental focus.

Specialized fields like geology are closely linked to environmental sciences. Those interested can pursue online geology degrees, which typically cover earth processes, mineralogy, and environmental impact studies—skills vital for roles in conservation and natural resource management.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental monitoring and planning. Programs listed as the best GIS programs offer training in spatial data analysis, essential for careers in environmental consulting, urban planning, and resource management.

Best Scientists Citing Guenter Engling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles