World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
24331
World Ranking
3783
National Ranking
2117

David T. Lykken publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. Lykken sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David T. Lykken D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. Lykken sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - APA Distinguished Scientific Award for the Applications of Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 1976 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

David T. Lykken was affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily focused on psychology, with a specialization in experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's recent publication was titled Heritability Estimates from Twin Studies: The Efficiency of the MZA Design, published in 2025 in the journal Twin Research and Human Genetics. This paper addressed methodologies within genetic studies involving twins.

Lykken collaborated frequently with other researchers, notably Seymour Geisser and Auke Tellegen. Their work was predominantly published in the journal Twin Research and Human Genetics.

The main topics of their research included cognitive abilities and testing, reflecting a focus on understanding human cognitive performance and assessment techniques.

The following lists provide more details on their academic contributions:

  • Recent paper: Heritability Estimates from Twin Studies: The Efficiency of the MZA Design (2025, Twin Research and Human Genetics)

  • Frequent co-authors: Seymour Geisser, Auke Tellegen

  • Frequent publication venue: Twin Research and Human Genetics

  • Main field of study: Psychology
  • Subfield: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  • Main topic of work: Cognitive Abilities and Testing

David T. Lykken received several recognitions during their career, including the APA Distinguished Scientific Award for the Applications of Psychology from the American Psychological Association in 2001 and was named a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1976.

Best Publications

  • Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together.

    Auke Tellegen;David T. Lykken;Thomas J. Bouchard;Kimerly J. Wilcox

  • Sources of human psychological differences: the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart.

    Thomas J. Bouchard;David T. Lykken;Matthew McGue;Nancy L. Segal

  • Happiness Is a Stochastic Phenomenon

    David T. Lykken;Auke Tellegen

  • Statistical Significance in Psychological Research

    David T. Lykken

  • A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality.

    David T. Lykken

  • Direct measurement of skin conductance: a proposal for standardization.

    David T. Lykken;Peter H. Venables

  • Heterogeneity in the inheritance of alcoholism: A study of male and female twins.

    Roy W. Pickens;Dace S. Svikis;Matt McGue;David T. Lykken

  • Personality Stability and Change in Early Adulthood: A Behavioral Genetic Analysis

    Matt McGue;Steven Bacon;David T. Lykken

  • The GSR in the detection of guilt.

    Unknown

  • Behavioral genetics of cognitive ability: A life-span perspective.

    Matt McGue;Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.;William G. Iacono;David T. Lykken

  • Heritability of Substance Abuse and Antisocial Behavior: A Study of Monozygotic Twins Reared Apart

    William M. Grove;Elke D. Eckert;Leonard Heston;Thomas J. Bouchard

  • Research with twins: The concept of emergenesis.

    David T. Lykken

  • The Minnesota twin family registry : some initial findings

    D. T. Lykken;T. J. Bouchard;M. Mcgue;A. Tellegen

  • Genetic and Environmental Influences on Religious Interests, Attitudes, and Values: A Study of Twins Reared Apart and Together

    Niels G. Waller;Brian A. Kojetin;Thomas J. Bouchard;David T. Lykken

  • Genetic Influence on Risk of Divorce

    Matt McGue;David T. Lykken

  • Emergenesis: Genetic traits that may not run in families.

    David T. Lykken;Matt McGue;A. Tellegen;T. J. Bouchard

  • Personality and divorce : A genetic analysis

    Victor Jocklin;Matt McGue;David T. Lykken

  • Psychology and the lie detector industry.

    Unknown

  • Volunteer bias in twin research: The rule of two-thirds.

    David T. Lykken;A. Tellegen;R. DeRubeis

  • Range correction applied to heart rate and to GSR data.

    D. T. Lykken

  • Is human mating adventitious or the result of lawful choice? A twin study of mate selection.

    David T. Lykken;Auke Tellegen

  • Recruitment bias in twin research: the rule of two-thirds reconsidered.

    David T. Lykken;M. McGue;Auke Tellegen

Frequent Co-Authors

Auke Tellegen
Auke Tellegen University of Minnesota
William G. Iacono
William G. Iacono University of Minnesota
Matt McGue
Matt McGue University of Minnesota
Thomas J. Bouchard
Thomas J. Bouchard University of Minnesota
Nancy L. Segal
Nancy L. Segal California State University, Fullerton
Niels G. Waller
Niels G. Waller University of Minnesota
Jeanette Taylor
Jeanette Taylor Florida State University
Stephen S. Rich
Stephen S. Rich University of Virginia
Roderick P. McDonald
Roderick P. McDonald University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
John Gruzelier
John Gruzelier Goldsmiths University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up many different career options and pathways, particularly in the growing field of mental health. Online psychology degrees offer flexibility and accessibility for students balancing work or family commitments while preparing for professional roles such as counseling, therapy, or research.

Aspiring mental health professionals should be aware that each location has unique steps to certification. For example, if you want to become a mental health counselor in Huntsville or are considering how to become a mental health counselor in Indianapolis, local requirements will influence your educational journey and licensure process. Likewise, Irvine mental health counselor certification requirements and mental health counselor requirements in Irving each have distinct standards regarding supervised practice, exams, and continuing education.

Choosing an accredited online psychology program ensures that you meet these regional requirements and are well-prepared for future licensure. Researching the specific prerequisites in your intended state or city will help pave the way for a rewarding career in mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing David T. Lykken

Recently Published Articles