World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Geert Kelchtermans

Geert Kelchtermans

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 42 4617 4267 54 53 323 11435

Geert Kelchtermans publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Geert Kelchtermans between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Geert Kelchtermans published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2013. 3 of the 352 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2013. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 33 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1986 2025

352 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Geert Kelchtermans: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 2
1988 3
1989 1
1990 2
1991 3
1992 2
1993 3
1994 7
1995 5
1996 7
1997 3
1998 7
1999 8
2000 18
2001 7
2002 12
2003 6
2004 18
2005 11
2006 11
2007 22
2008 15
2009 26
2010 12
2011 8
2012 6
2013 33
2014 13
2015 15
2016 15
2017 10
2018 11
2019 7
2020 6
2021 8
2022 3
2023 2
2024 2
2025 1
Total 352
Download as CSV

Geert Kelchtermans publications per year - data summary

  • Geert Kelchtermans, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from KU Leuven, has 352 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2013, with 33 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1986, 1989 and 2025, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 8.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.8 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 16 publications, 5% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 54 publications (3.9 per year); 2000-2013: 205 publications (14.6 per year); 2014-2025: 93 publications (7.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Geert Kelchtermans publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert Kelchtermans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 314–323 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 323 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101 323
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Geert Kelchtermans publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Geert Kelchtermans, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from KU Leuven, records 323 publications - the 90th percentile of the discipline.
  • 90% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Geert Kelchtermans, and about 10% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Geert Kelchtermans ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Geert Kelchtermans D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert Kelchtermans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313 42
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Geert Kelchtermans D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Geert Kelchtermans, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from KU Leuven, records 42 D-Index - the 42nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 42% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Geert Kelchtermans, and about 58% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Geert Kelchtermans ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Geert Kelchtermans is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and works primarily within the social sciences, with a focus on education. Their research spans several subfields, including education, information systems and management, sociology and political science, social psychology, and safety research.

The main areas of their work cover topics such as:

  • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Parental Involvement in Education
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion

Kelchtermans has published extensively, with frequent contributions to notable academic journals. The venues where they have been most published include:

  • Teachers and Teaching
  • Teaching and Teacher Education
  • Cadernos de Pesquisa
  • Frontiers in Education
  • Research Papers in Education

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Kelchtermans are:

  • "ABANDONO DOCENTE EN AMÉRICA LATINA: REVISIÓN DE LA LITERATURA," 2020, published in Cadernos de Pesquisa
  • "Beyond traditional narratives about teacher professional development: A critical perspective on teachers' working life," 2023, published in Teaching and Teacher Education
  • "Strengthening Individual Teacher-Child Relationships: An Intervention Study Among Student Teachers in Special Education," 2021, published in Frontiers in Education
  • "Unpacking the dynamics of collegial networks in relation to beginning teachers' job attitudes," 2020, published in Research Papers in Education
  • "Parent-teacher relationships in school micropolitics: beginning teachers' stories," 2020, published in Teachers and Teaching

In their collaborative work, Kelchtermans frequently co-authors with several researchers, including:

  • Minna Uitto
  • Erkki T. Lassila
  • Eila Estola
  • Anne-Katrien Koenen
  • Jantine L. Spilt

Best Publications

  • Who I am in how I teach is the message: self‐understanding, vulnerability and reflection

    Geert Kelchtermans

  • The micropolitics of teacher induction. A narrative-biographical study on teacher socialisation

    Geert Kelchtermans;Katrijn Ballet

  • Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy

    Geert Kelchtermans

  • Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research

    Fien Depaepe;Lieven Verschaffel;Geert Kelchtermans

  • GETTING THE STORY, UNDERSTANDING THE LIVES: FROM CAREER STORIES TO TEACHERS' PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

    Unknown

  • Teacher Vulnerability: understanding its moral and political roots

    Geert Kelchtermans

  • Conditions fostering the implementation of large-scale innovation programs in schools : Teachers' perspectives

    Femke Geijsel;Peter Sleegers;Rudolf van den Berg;Geert Kelchtermans

  • The state of the art in Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices: a systematic literature review

    Eline Vanassche;Geert Kelchtermans

  • Beyond Intensification towards a Scholarship of Practice: Analysing Changes in Teachers' Work Lives.

    Katrijn Ballet;Geert Kelchtermans;Jeffrey John Loughran

  • ‘Should I stay or should I go?’: unpacking teacher attrition/retention as an educational issue

    Geert Kelchtermans

  • Sense-making and structure in teachers’ reception of educational reform. A case study on statistics in the mathematics curriculum

    Virginie März;Virginie März;Geert Kelchtermans

  • Teacher collaboration and collegiality as workplace conditions. A review

    Geert Kelchtermans

  • Teachers’ professional development: a biographical perspective

    Geert Kelchtermans;Roland Vandenberghe

  • Teacher educators' professionalism in practice: Positioning theory and personal interpretative framework

    Eline Vanassche;Geert Kelchtermans

  • Micropolitical literacy: reconstructing a neglected dimension in teacher development

    Geert Kelchtermans;Katrijn Ballet

  • Struggling with workload: Primary teachers’ experience of intensification

    Katrijn Ballet;Geert Kelchtermans

  • Teachers' content and pedagogical content knowledge on rational numbers: A comparison of prospective elementary and lower secondary school teachers

    Fien Depaepe;Joke Torbeyns;Nathalie Vermeersch;Dirk Janssens

  • CPD for professional renewal: moving beyond knowledge for practice

    Geert Kelchtermans

  • Learning (Not) to become a Teacher: A Qualitative Analysis of the Job Entrance Issue.

    Isabel Rots;Geert Kelchtermans;Antonia Aelterman

  • Towards an ‘international forum for teacher educator development’: an agenda for research and action*

    Geert Kelchtermans;Kari Smith;Ruben Vanderlinde

  • Workload and willingness to change: disentangling the experience of intensification

    Katrijn Ballet;Geert Kelchtermans

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruben Vanderlinde
Ruben Vanderlinde Ghent University
Geert Devos
Geert Devos Ghent University
Frederik Maes
Frederik Maes KU Leuven
Peter Sleegers
Peter Sleegers University of Twente
Erik De Corte
Erik De Corte KU Leuven
John Loughran
John Loughran Monash University
Jeffrey John Loughran
Jeffrey John Loughran Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in social sciences and humanities offers flexible options for advancing your career. Many universities now provide accelerated and affordable programs designed to fit a variety of interests and professional goals.

If you’re aiming for a quick path into social work, 1 year msw programs can fast-track your route to impactful roles in communities and organizations. Meanwhile, those curious about human behavior and mental health might consider earning an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree. These flexible options allow you to graduate sooner and start making a difference.

For those interested in professional counseling, accredited programs are essential. Universities offer cacrep-accredited programs online that meet rigorous academic standards and prepare you for licensure. If your passion is supporting couples and families, mft masters programs provide specialized training for careers in marriage and family therapy.

Online programs in social sciences and humanities give you the flexibility to balance your studies with work or other commitments, while preparing you for rewarding careers in fields like counseling, therapy, and social work.

Best Scientists Citing Geert Kelchtermans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles