World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tracey J. Woodruff

Tracey J. Woodruff

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
82
Citations
24634
World Ranking
882
National Ranking
384

Tracey J. Woodruff publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tracey J. Woodruff sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 303 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Tracey J. Woodruff D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tracey J. Woodruff sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tracey J. Woodruff is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science with a notable emphasis on topics intersecting health and toxicology.

The main fields of study Woodruff contributes to include Environmental Science, with subfields that cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Key topics in their work are:

  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Environmental Justice and Health Disparities

Woodruff has published extensively, including recent papers such as:

  • Global, regional, and national burdens of ischemic heart disease and stroke attributable to exposure to long working hours for 194 countries, 2000-2016: A systematic analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury (2021, Environment International)
  • The effect of exposure to long working hours on ischaemic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury (2020, Environment International)
  • The Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO)-Wide Cohort (2023, American Journal of Epidemiology)
  • Defining the Scope of Exposome Studies and Research Needs from a Multidisciplinary Perspective (2021, Environmental Science & Technology Letters)
  • Climate change, women's health, and the role of obstetricians and gynecologists in leadership (2021, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Woodruff include:

  • Rachel Morello-Frosch
  • Amy Padula
  • Stephanie M. Eick
  • Dana E. Goin
  • Dimitri Abrahamsson

Woodruff's work has appeared in numerous publication venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • ISEE Conference Abstracts
  • Environment International
  • Environmental Health
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Environmental Science & Technology

Best Publications

  • Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Public Health Protection: A Statement of Principles from The Endocrine Society

    R. Thomas Zoeller;T. R. Brown;L. L. Doan;A. C. Gore

  • Environmental chemicals in pregnant women in the United States: NHANES 2003-2004.

    Tracey J. Woodruff;Ami R. Zota;Jackie M. Schwartz

  • State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals 2012. Summary for Decision-Makers

    Georg Becher;Åke Bergman;Poul Bjerregaard;Riana Bornman

  • Consensus on the key characteristics of endocrine-disrupting chemicals as a basis for hazard identification.

    Michele A. La Merrill;Laura N. Vandenberg;Martyn T. Smith;William Goodson

  • Medical hypothesis: xenoestrogens as preventable causes of breast cancer.

    D L Davis;H L Bradlow;M Wolff;T Woodruff

  • Temporal trends in phthalate exposures: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2010.

    Ami R. Zota;Antonia M. Calafat;Tracey J. Woodruff

  • Female reproductive disorders: the roles of endocrine-disrupting compounds and developmental timing.

    D. Andrew Crain;Sarah J. Janssen;Thea M. Edwards;Jerrold Heindel

  • The relationship between selected causes of postneonatal infant mortality and particulate air pollution in the United States.

    Tracey J. Woodruff;Jeanne Grillo;Kenneth C. Schoendorf

  • Maternal Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution and Term Birth Weight: A Multi-Country Evaluation of Effect and Heterogeneity

    Payam Dadvand;Jennifer Parker;Michelle L. Bell;Matteo Bonzini

  • The Navigation Guide systematic review methodology: a rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomes.

    Tracey J. Woodruff;Patrice Sutton

  • Environmental Exposures and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Review of the Science

    Karen Perry Stillerman;Donald R. Mattison;Linda C. Giudice;Tracey J. Woodruff

  • The Navigation Guide—Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Environmental Health: Systematic Review of Human Evidence for PFOA Effects on Fetal Growth

    Erica Koustas;Juleen Lam;Patrice Sutton;Paula I. Johnson

  • Dose–Response Relationship of Prenatal Mercury Exposure and IQ: An Integrative Analysis of Epidemiologic Data

    Daniel A. Axelrad;David C. Bellinger;Louise Marie Ryan;Tracey J. Woodruff

  • Global, regional, and national burdens of ischemic heart disease and stroke attributable to exposure to long working hours for 194 countries, 2000-2016: A systematic analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury.

    Frank Pega;Bálint Náfrádi;Natalie C Momen;Yuka Ujita

  • Meeting report: Atmospheric pollution and human reproduction

    Rémy Slama;Lyndsey Darrow;Jennifer Parker;Tracey J. Woodruff

  • The Impact of Endocrine Disruption: A Consensus Statement on the State of the Science

    Åke Bergman;Jerrold J. Heindel;Tim Kasten;Karen A Kidd

  • International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics opinion on reproductive health impacts of exposure to toxic environmental chemicals

    Gian Carlo Di Renzo;Jeanne A. Conry;Jennifer Blake;Mark S. DeFrancesco

  • Dietary exposures to food contaminants across the United States.

    Charlotte P. Dougherty;Sarah Henricks Holtz;Joseph C. Reinert;Lily Panyacosit

  • Estimated daily phthalate exposures in a population of mothers of male infants exhibiting reduced anogenital distance.

    Kevin Marsee;Tracey J. Woodruff;Daniel A. Axelrad;Antonia M. Calafat

  • GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health.

    Rebecca L. Morgan;Kristina A. Thayer;Lisa Bero;Nigel Bruce

  • Disparities in exposure to air pollution during pregnancy.

    Tracey J Woodruff;Jennifer D Parker;Amy D Kyle;Kenneth C Schoendorf

  • Differences in the carcinogenic evaluation of glyphosate between the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

    Christopher J. Portier;Bruce K Armstrong;Bruce C Baguley;Xaver Baur

  • Associations between prenatal maternal exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and birth outcomes among pregnant women in San Francisco

    Stephanie M. Eick;Elizabeth K. Hom Thepaksorn;Monika A. Izano;Lara J. Cushing

Frequent Co-Authors

Rachel Morello-Frosch
Rachel Morello-Frosch University of California, Berkeley
Linda C. Giudice
Linda C. Giudice University of California, San Francisco
Lisa Bero
Lisa Bero University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
David Q. Rich
David Q. Rich University of Rochester Medical Center
David C. Bellinger
David C. Bellinger Boston Children's Hospital
Edo D. Pellizzari
Edo D. Pellizzari Research Triangle Park Foundation
Andreas Kortenkamp
Andreas Kortenkamp Brunel University London
Kurunthachalam Kannan
Kurunthachalam Kannan University at Albany, State University of New York
Michelle L. Bell
Michelle L. Bell Yale University
Deborah H. Bennett
Deborah H. Bennett University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in broader or complementary fields alongside Environmental Sciences, several online degree options can enhance career prospects. For instance, pursuing an online dsw programs in social work can prepare graduates to address environmental justice and community well-being challenges, blending social advocacy with ecological expertise.

Students looking for flexibility might consider enrolling in one of the most affordable online general studies degree programs. These programs offer multidisciplinary knowledge, allowing learners to tailor their studies toward environmental topics without committing to a single major.

For those seeking a quicker or less demanding path, exploring some of the easy bachelor's degree programs online can be an option, though it’s important to balance ease with relevance to one’s career goals in environmental fields.

Lastly, specialized degrees like an online geology program offer direct insight into Earth sciences. Identifying the geology online degree that fits your needs can open doors to roles in natural resource management, environmental consulting, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Tracey J. Woodruff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles