| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental Sciences | 55 | 3816 | 3645 | 1455 | 1340 | 259 | 12637 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Kimberly Yolton between 1989 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kimberly Yolton published across 38 years, from 1989 to 2026, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2021. 26 of the 370 publications appeared in the last two years.
370 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 0 |
| 1991 | 1 |
| 1992 | 1 |
| 1993 | 0 |
| 1994 | 1 |
| 1995 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 2 |
| 1999 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 |
| 2001 | 0 |
| 2002 | 0 |
| 2003 | 0 |
| 2004 | 3 |
| 2005 | 5 |
| 2006 | 2 |
| 2007 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2 |
| 2009 | 3 |
| 2010 | 2 |
| 2011 | 5 |
| 2012 | 15 |
| 2013 | 6 |
| 2014 | 11 |
| 2015 | 14 |
| 2016 | 23 |
| 2017 | 17 |
| 2018 | 31 |
| 2019 | 23 |
| 2020 | 43 |
| 2021 | 47 |
| 2022 | 29 |
| 2023 | 25 |
| 2024 | 31 |
| 2025 | 25 |
| 2026 | 1 |
| Total | 370 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly Yolton sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 259 publications — 79th percentile
79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 41–50 | 21 | |
| 51–60 | 62 | |
| 61–70 | 133 | |
| 71–80 | 257 | |
| 81–90 | 361 | |
| 91–100 | 440 | |
| 101–110 | 492 | |
| 111–120 | 541 | |
| 121–130 | 617 | |
| 131–140 | 544 | |
| 141–150 | 541 | |
| 151–160 | 539 | |
| 161–170 | 444 | |
| 171–180 | 444 | |
| 181–190 | 400 | |
| 191–200 | 377 | |
| 201–210 | 318 | |
| 211–220 | 282 | |
| 221–230 | 263 | |
| 231–240 | 220 | |
| 241–250 | 217 | |
| 251–260 | 180 | 259 |
| 261–270 | 181 | |
| 271–280 | 155 | |
| 281–290 | 130 | |
| 291–300 | 127 | |
| 301–310 | 130 | |
| 311–320 | 85 | |
| 321–330 | 106 | |
| 331–340 | 80 | |
| 341–350 | 83 | |
| 351–360 | 75 | |
| 361–370 | 69 | |
| 371–380 | 52 | |
| 381–390 | 54 | |
| 391–400 | 56 | |
| 401–410 | 44 | |
| 411–420 | 40 | |
| 421–430 | 36 | |
| 431–440 | 25 | |
| 441–450 | 25 | |
| 451–460 | 32 | |
| 461–470 | 29 | |
| 471–480 | 21 | |
| 481–490 | 26 | |
| 491–500 | 26 | |
| 501–510 | 17 | |
| 511–520 | 19 | |
| 521–530 | 15 | |
| 531–540 | 22 | |
| 541–550 | 12 | |
| 551–560 | 15 | |
| 561–570 | 11 | |
| 571–580 | 19 | |
| 581–590 | 9 | |
| 591–600 | 9 | |
| 601–610 | 7 | |
| 611–620 | 11 | |
| 621–630 | 5 | |
| 631–640 | 5 | |
| 641–650 | 6 | |
| 651–660 | 3 | |
| 661–670 | 3 | |
| 671–680 | 4 | |
| 681–689 | 4 | |
| 690+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly Yolton sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile
61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 12 | |
| 31 | 26 | |
| 32 | 51 | |
| 33 | 88 | |
| 34 | 123 | |
| 35 | 163 | |
| 36 | 206 | |
| 37 | 267 | |
| 38 | 265 | |
| 39 | 275 | |
| 40 | 321 | |
| 41 | 343 | |
| 42 | 305 | |
| 43 | 336 | |
| 44 | 330 | |
| 45 | 348 | |
| 46 | 291 | |
| 47 | 275 | |
| 48 | 272 | |
| 49 | 273 | |
| 50 | 263 | |
| 51 | 232 | |
| 52 | 266 | |
| 53 | 217 | |
| 54 | 198 | |
| 55 | 177 | 55 |
| 56 | 202 | |
| 57 | 204 | |
| 58 | 166 | |
| 59 | 177 | |
| 60 | 166 | |
| 61 | 152 | |
| 62 | 143 | |
| 63 | 150 | |
| 64 | 124 | |
| 65 | 119 | |
| 66 | 120 | |
| 67 | 118 | |
| 68 | 82 | |
| 69 | 98 | |
| 70 | 94 | |
| 71 | 105 | |
| 72 | 74 | |
| 73 | 84 | |
| 74 | 70 | |
| 75 | 67 | |
| 76 | 78 | |
| 77 | 60 | |
| 78 | 59 | |
| 79 | 52 | |
| 80 | 47 | |
| 81 | 38 | |
| 82 | 48 | |
| 83 | 42 | |
| 84 | 42 | |
| 85 | 43 | |
| 86 | 29 | |
| 87 | 37 | |
| 88 | 29 | |
| 89 | 30 | |
| 90 | 34 | |
| 91 | 20 | |
| 92 | 22 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 19 | |
| 95 | 24 | |
| 96 | 21 | |
| 97 | 20 | |
| 98 | 24 | |
| 99 | 17 | |
| 100 | 17 | |
| 101 | 21 | |
| 102 | 25 | |
| 103 | 18 | |
| 104 | 26 | |
| 105 | 20 | |
| 106 | 15 | |
| 107 | 10 | |
| 108 | 13 | |
| 109 | 15 | |
| 110 | 12 | |
| 111 | 8 | |
| 112 | 7 | |
| 113 | 9 | |
| 114 | 6 | |
| 115 | 12 | |
| 116 | 7 | |
| 117 | 8 | |
| 118 | 3 | |
| 119 | 5 | |
| 120 | 7 | |
| 121 | 2 | |
| 122 | 4 | |
| 123 | 8 | |
| 124 | 7 | |
| 125 | 9 | |
| 126+ | 92 |
Bruce P. Lanphear;Richard Hornung;Richard Hornung;Jane Khoury;Jane Khoury;Kimberly Yolton
Joe M. Braun;Amy E. Kalkbrenner;Antonia M. Calafat;Kimberly Yolton
Joe M. Braun;Kimberly Yolton;Kim N. Dietrich;Richard Hornung
Kimberly Yolton;Kim Dietrich;Kim Dietrich;Peggy Auinger;Bruce P. Lanphear
Joseph M. Braun;Amy E. Kalkbrenner;Allan C. Just;Kimberly Yolton
Aimin Chen;Kimberly Yolton;Stephen A. Rauch;Glenys M. Webster
Kimberly Yolton;Yingying Xu;Donna Strauss;Mekibib Altaye
Joseph M. Braun;Geetika Kalloo;Aimin Chen;Kim N. Dietrich
Melissa Wagner-Schuman;Jason R Richardson;Peggy Auinger;Joseph M Braun
Sarah F. Evans;Roni W. Kobrosly;Emily S. Barrett;Sally W. Thurston
Kim N. Dietrich;Brenda Eskenazi;Susan L Schantz;Kimberly Yolton
Erika F. Werner;Joseph M. Braun;Kimberly Yolton;Jane C. Khoury
Megan E. Romano;Glenys M. Webster;Ann M. Vuong;R. Thomas Zoeller
Ann M. Vuong;Kimberly Yolton;Kim N. Dietrich;Joseph M. Braun
Deborah J. Watkins;Melissa Eliot;Sheela Sathyanarayana;Antonia M. Calafat
Kimberly Yolton;Yingying Xu;Jane Khoury;Paul Succop
Bruce P. Lanphear;Richard W. Hornung;Jane Khoury;Kimberly Yolton
Ann M. Vuong;Kimberly Yolton;Glenys M. Webster;Andreas Sjödin
Ann M. Vuong;Glenys M. Webster;Megan E. Romano;Joseph M. Braun
Hongmei Zhang;Kimberly Yolton;Glenys M. Webster;Andreas Sjödin
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which benefit from advanced education. For those interested in leadership roles or academic careers, exploring online doctoral programs without dissertation can be a practical option. These programs offer a flexible way to gain expertise without the intensive research project typical of traditional doctorates.
Educators aiming to advance their qualifications often consider an online eds to edd bridge program. This pathway allows licensed educators to transition seamlessly from a master's level EdS to a doctoral EdD degree, enhancing their career prospects in administration and policy.
For professionals focused on community impact and social dimensions of environmental work, a fully funded dsw programs online provide valuable training while minimizing financial barriers. These programs emphasize practical skills for driving social change and can complement environmental science expertise.
Additionally, those seeking flexible and affordable foundational education can consider an online general studies degree affordable to build interdisciplinary knowledge. This broad approach fosters a versatile skill set applicable to multiple environmental careers.