| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular Biology | 61 | 1884 | 1693 | 938 | 828 | 193 | 18182 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Scott C. Kogan between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott C. Kogan published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 94 publications in 2023. 56 of the 346 publications appeared in the last two years.
346 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1988 | 4 |
| 1989 | 2 |
| 1990 | 2 |
| 1991 | 1 |
| 1992 | 1 |
| 1993 | 0 |
| 1994 | 0 |
| 1995 | 2 |
| 1996 | 1 |
| 1997 | 1 |
| 1998 | 2 |
| 1999 | 4 |
| 2000 | 2 |
| 2001 | 4 |
| 2002 | 5 |
| 2003 | 7 |
| 2004 | 13 |
| 2005 | 12 |
| 2006 | 12 |
| 2007 | 8 |
| 2008 | 8 |
| 2009 | 4 |
| 2010 | 12 |
| 2011 | 11 |
| 2012 | 6 |
| 2013 | 10 |
| 2014 | 8 |
| 2015 | 10 |
| 2016 | 10 |
| 2017 | 2 |
| 2018 | 6 |
| 2019 | 3 |
| 2020 | 8 |
| 2021 | 9 |
| 2022 | 6 |
| 2023 | 94 |
| 2024 | 37 |
| 2025 | 19 |
| Total | 346 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott C. Kogan sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 193 publications — 56th percentile
56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 47–56 | 7 | |
| 57–66 | 17 | |
| 67–76 | 65 | |
| 77–86 | 90 | |
| 87–96 | 125 | |
| 97–106 | 131 | |
| 107–116 | 162 | |
| 117–126 | 177 | |
| 127–136 | 158 | |
| 137–146 | 158 | |
| 147–156 | 146 | |
| 157–166 | 159 | |
| 167–176 | 131 | |
| 177–186 | 110 | |
| 187–196 | 112 | 193 |
| 197–206 | 100 | |
| 207–216 | 89 | |
| 217–226 | 98 | |
| 227–236 | 74 | |
| 237–246 | 72 | |
| 247–256 | 63 | |
| 257–266 | 53 | |
| 267–276 | 54 | |
| 277–286 | 49 | |
| 287–296 | 52 | |
| 297–306 | 43 | |
| 307–316 | 46 | |
| 317–326 | 41 | |
| 327–336 | 42 | |
| 337–346 | 31 | |
| 347–356 | 28 | |
| 357–366 | 29 | |
| 367–376 | 26 | |
| 377–386 | 24 | |
| 387–396 | 24 | |
| 397–406 | 14 | |
| 407–416 | 13 | |
| 417–426 | 20 | |
| 427–436 | 12 | |
| 437–446 | 20 | |
| 447–456 | 11 | |
| 457–466 | 10 | |
| 467–476 | 14 | |
| 477–486 | 14 | |
| 487–496 | 10 | |
| 497–506 | 13 | |
| 507–516 | 13 | |
| 517–526 | 2 | |
| 527–536 | 4 | |
| 537–546 | 6 | |
| 547–556 | 8 | |
| 557–563 | 6 | |
| 564+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott C. Kogan sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 61 D-Index — 39th percentile
39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 40–41 | 36 | |
| 42–43 | 101 | |
| 44–45 | 115 | |
| 46–47 | 121 | |
| 48–49 | 118 | |
| 50–51 | 130 | |
| 52–53 | 106 | |
| 54–55 | 116 | |
| 56–57 | 113 | |
| 58–59 | 129 | |
| 60–61 | 120 | 61 |
| 62–63 | 105 | |
| 64–65 | 131 | |
| 66–67 | 95 | |
| 68–69 | 97 | |
| 70–71 | 106 | |
| 72–73 | 83 | |
| 74–75 | 89 | |
| 76–77 | 77 | |
| 78–79 | 70 | |
| 80–81 | 73 | |
| 82–83 | 60 | |
| 84–85 | 48 | |
| 86–87 | 45 | |
| 88–89 | 50 | |
| 90–91 | 31 | |
| 92–93 | 51 | |
| 94–95 | 43 | |
| 96–97 | 38 | |
| 98–99 | 39 | |
| 100–101 | 41 | |
| 102–103 | 29 | |
| 104–105 | 33 | |
| 106–107 | 35 | |
| 108–109 | 20 | |
| 110–111 | 38 | |
| 112–113 | 19 | |
| 114–115 | 28 | |
| 116–117 | 13 | |
| 118–119 | 23 | |
| 120–121 | 16 | |
| 122–123 | 15 | |
| 124–125 | 11 | |
| 126–127 | 21 | |
| 128–129 | 7 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 14 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 9 | |
| 138–139 | 8 | |
| 140–141 | 16 | |
| 142–143 | 7 | |
| 144 | 7 | |
| 145+ | 100 |
Scott C. Kogan is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans primarily across the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant work in molecular biology, public health, pediatrics, oncology, and hematology.
The scientist has contributed extensively to several main research topics, including:
Frequent publication venues for their work include:
They have collaborated often with several researchers, among the most frequent co-authors are:
Some of their recent papers are:
Johannes Zuber;Junwei Shi;Junwei Shi;Eric Wang;Amy R. Rappaport;Amy R. Rappaport
Hans-Guido Wendel;Elisa de Stanchina;Jordan S. Fridman;Jordan S. Fridman;Abba Malina
Scott C. Kogan;Marie Doherty;Jane Gitschier
Yuchen Chien;Claudio Scuoppo;Xiaowo Wang;Xueping Fang
Diane Brown;Scott Kogan;Eric Lagasse;Irving Weissman
Scott C. Kogan;Jerrold M. Ward;Miriam R. Anver;Jules J. Berman
Valérie Lallemand-Breitenbach;Marie-Claude Guillemin;Anne Janin;Marie-Thérèse Daniel
Unknown
Herbert C. Morse;Miriam R. Anver;Torgny N. Fredrickson;Diana C. Haines
Benjamin S. Braun;David A. Tuveson;Namie Kong;Doan T. Le
Prem K Premsrirut;Prem K Premsrirut;Lukas E Dow;Sang Yong Kim;Matthew Camiolo;Matthew Camiolo
John R. Mills;Yoshitaka Hippo;Francis Robert;Samuel M. H. Chen
Chong Chen;Yu KiKi Liu;Amy R Rappaport;Thomas Kitzing
Johannes Zuber;Ina Radtke;Timothy S. Pardee;Zhen Zhao
Johannes Zuber;Amy R. Rappaport;Weijun Luo;Eric Wang
Karl Pfeifer;Kwang-Soo Kim;Scott Kogan;Leonard Guarente
E. Camilla Forsberg;Thomas Serwold;Scott Kogan;Irving L. Weissman
John M. Joslin;Anthony A. Fernald;Thelma R. Tennant;Elizabeth M. Davis
Doan T. Le;Namie Kong;Yuan Zhu;Jennifer O. Lauchle
Patrick Viatour;Tim C. Somervaille;Shivkumar Venkatasubrahmanyam;Scott Kogan
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring Molecular Biology often raises questions about flexible career options and pathways. Many related fields now offer convenient online degree programs, making it easier to balance study, work, and other commitments.
If you’re interested in science communication or information management, consider the cost of mlis degree us—a pathway into libraries, research institutions, and information science. For those fascinated by healthcare and communication, speech-language pathology is another in-demand field. Accredited programs are essential; check out asha approved slp programs for online options that meet national standards.
Individuals with a background in molecular or biological sciences can transition into clinical speech-language roles through slp bridge programs, which are designed specifically for non-SLP majors. Additionally, if you’re considering a shift to nursing, accelerated bsn programs for non nurses enable a rapid transition into nursing careers—even without prior nursing experience.
Each of these online pathways offers flexibility, affordability, and diverse career prospects, making them excellent alternatives or complements to molecular biology training.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Seoul National University
University of Otago
University of Houston
Heidelberg University
National University of Singapore
Forschungszentrum Jülich
Leiden University Medical Center
New York University
University of California, Los Angeles
Technische Universität Braunschweig
Kyoto University
University of Milan
Istituto Giannina Gaslini
University of Iowa
University of Utah
