World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michelle M. Le Beau

Michelle M. Le Beau

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 101 7798 7329 4066 3759 368 62280
Molecular Biology 98 562 503 307 271 356 61259

Michelle M. Le Beau publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michelle M. Le Beau between 1983 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michelle M. Le Beau published across 41 years, from 1983 to 2023, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 59 publications in 2023. 65 of the 455 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 59. Peak 59 publications in 2023. 1983: 2 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 18 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 45 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 59 publications
1983 2023

455 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michelle M. Le Beau: publications per year, 1983 to 2023
Year Publications
1983 2
1984 5
1985 9
1986 5
1987 3
1988 10
1989 18
1990 10
1991 45
1992 12
1993 12
1994 2
1995 10
1996 8
1997 8
1998 11
1999 4
2000 9
2001 6
2002 13
2003 7
2004 14
2005 10
2006 9
2007 15
2008 8
2009 9
2010 14
2011 9
2012 15
2013 13
2014 12
2015 16
2016 12
2017 9
2018 7
2019 0
2020 5
2021 4
2022 6
2023 59
Total 455
Download as CSV

Michelle M. Le Beau publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle M. Le Beau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 347–356 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 356 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28 356
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Michelle M. Le Beau D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle M. Le Beau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39 98
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Michelle M. Le Beau is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research contributions primarily span the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with notable specialization in Hematology, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Immunology, and Cancer Research.

Their main research topics focus on Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research, Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment, and the role of Immune Cells in cancer.

Le Beau has authored or coauthored several recent papers, including:

  • International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data (2022), published in Blood
  • Progress in Cancer Research, Prevention, and Care (2020), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • axl, a transforming gene isolated from primary human myeloid leukemia cells, encodes a novel receptor tyrosine kinase. (2020), published in UNC Libraries
  • Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for acute myeloid leukemia (2021), published in Nature Communications
  • Cytotoxic Therapy-Induced Effects on Both Hematopoietic and Marrow Stromal Cells Promotes Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasms (2020), published in Blood Cancer Discovery

Their frequent coauthors include Richard A. Larson, Megan E. McNerney, Wendy Stock, Hervé Dombret, and Lucy A. Godley. These collaborators have contributed to various research projects with Le Beau, forming part of a consistent professional network.

Michelle M. Le Beau's work is often published in several journals known for their focus on hematologic and oncologic research. The most frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • Blood
  • Nature Communications
  • Blood Cancer Discovery
  • Blood Advances
  • New England Journal of Medicine

Best Publications

  • The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia

    Daniel A. Arber;Attilio Orazi;Robert Hasserjian;Jürgen Thiele

  • Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia

    Timothy J. Ley;Christopher Miller;Li Ding;Benjamin J. Raphael

  • The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes

    James W. Vardiman;Jüergen Thiele;Daniel A. Arber;Richard D. Brunning

  • Revised International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

    Peter L. Greenberg;Heinz Tuechler;Julie Schanz;Guillermo Sanz

  • The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response.

    James P Carney;James P Carney;Richard S Maser;Heidi Olivares;Elizabeth M Davis

  • A zinc finger-encoding gene coregulated with c-fos during growth and differentiation, and after cellular depolarization

    Vikas P. Sukhatme;Xinmin Cao;Louise C. Chang;Chon-Hwa Tsai-Morris

  • BCR–ABL1 lymphoblastic leukaemia is characterized by the deletion of Ikaros

    Charles G. Mullighan;Christopher B. Miller;Ina Radtke;Letha A. Phillips

  • Prostate stem cell antigen: A cell surface marker overexpressed in prostate cancer

    Robert E. Reiter;Zhennen Gu;Tetsuro Watabe;George Thomas

  • Acquired mutations in GATA1 in the megakaryoblastic leukemia of Down syndrome.

    Joshua Wechsler;Marianne Greene;Michael A. McDevitt;John Anastasi

  • Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development.

    Steven T. Kosak;Jane A. Skok;Kay L. Medina;Roy Riblet

  • Genetic characterization of TET1, TET2, and TET3 alterations in myeloid malignancies

    Omar Abdel-Wahab;Ann Mullally;Cyrus Hedvat;Guillermo Garcia-Manero

  • Clinical-cytogenetic associations in 306 patients with therapy-related myelodysplasia and myeloid leukemia: the University of Chicago series.

    Sonali M. Smith;Michelle M. Le Beau;Dezheng Huo;Theodore Karrison

  • MicroRNA expression signatures accurately discriminate acute lymphoblastic leukemia from acute myeloid leukemia

    Shuangli Mi;Jun Lu;Jun Lu;Miao Sun;Zejuan Li

  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Quiescence Promotes Error-Prone DNA Repair and Mutagenesis

    Mary Mohrin;Emer Bourke;David Alexander;Matthew R. Warr

  • Human and rat brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3: gene structures, distributions, and chromosomal localizations.

    Peter C. Maisonpierre;Michelle M. Le Beau;Rafael Espinosa;Nancy Y. Ip

  • Acute myeloid leukemia induced by graded reduction of a lineage-specific transcription factor, PU.1.

    Frank Rosenbauer;Katharina Wagner;Jeffery L Kutok;Hiromi Iwasaki

  • Replication stress is a potent driver of functional decline in ageing haematopoietic stem cells

    Johanna Flach;Sietske T. Bakker;Mary Mohrin;Pauline C. Conroy

  • New Comprehensive Cytogenetic Scoring System for Primary Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Oligoblastic Acute Myeloid Leukemia After MDS Derived From an International Database Merge

    Julie Schanz;Heinz Tüchler;Francesc Solé;Mar Mallo

  • Distinct microRNA expression profiles in acute myeloid leukemia with common translocations

    Zejuan Li;Jun Lu;Jun Lu;Miao Sun;Shuangli Mi

  • Receptor tyrosine kinase specific for the skeletal muscle lineage: Expression in embryonic muscle, at the neuromuscular junction, and after injury

    David M. Valenzuela;Trevor N. Stitt;Peter S. DiStefano;Eduardo Rojas

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Larson
Richard A. Larson University of Chicago
Janet D. Rowley
Janet D. Rowley University of Chicago
James W. Vardiman
James W. Vardiman University of Chicago
Kevin Shannon
Kevin Shannon University of California, San Francisco
Lucy A. Godley
Lucy A. Godley University of Chicago
Scott C. Kogan
Scott C. Kogan University of California, San Francisco
John M. Bennett
John M. Bennett University of Rochester Medical Center
Ulrich Germing
Ulrich Germing Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Peter L. Greenberg
Peter L. Greenberg Stanford University
Francesc Solé
Francesc Solé Autonomous University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to a broad spectrum of online degree and career opportunities. Many students discover overlapping interests in fields like healthcare, human services, psychology, and even design, all of which offer flexible online study options.

Students interested in the behavioral side of biology often consider clinical psychologist online programs. These programs integrate biological science and mental health, aligning well with students seeking interdisciplinary knowledge.

A human services degree online is another appealing path, perfect for those eager to make a direct impact in community and healthcare settings. These degrees are often structured for flexibility and can be completed quickly.

If you're exploring a transition from teaching, there are resources on career change for teachers higher pay, particularly into areas like speech pathology—a field that blends communication sciences and biology.

Beyond health sciences, creative students might be interested in science-adjacent programs such as online architecture school, where analytical and design skills meet in a digital learning environment.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle M. Le Beau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles