World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
113
Citations
91965
World Ranking
4818
National Ranking
2613

John M. Bennett publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Bennett sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 592 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John M. Bennett D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Bennett sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

John M. Bennett is affiliated with the University of Rochester Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine with a focus on surgery, hematology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, genetics, and emergency medicine.

Their main topics of work include:

  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Recent publications by John M. Bennett include:

  • "Implications of TP53 allelic state for genome stability, clinical presentation and outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes," 2020, Nature Medicine
  • "Enasidenib plus azacitidine versus azacitidine alone in patients with newly diagnosed, mutant-IDH2 acute myeloid leukaemia (AG221-AML-005): a single-arm, phase 1b and randomised, phase 2 trial," 2021, The Lancet Oncology
  • "NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Version 3.2022," 2022, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • "Risk Prediction Model of 90-Day Mortality After Esophagectomy for Cancer," 2021, JAMA Surgery
  • "Outcomes after totally minimally invasive versus hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: results from the International Esodata Study Group," 2021, British Journal of Surgery

Frequent co-authors collaborating with John M. Bennett include:

  • Richard Hardwick
  • Peter Safranek
  • Andrew Hindmarsh
  • Stavros Gourgiotis
  • Ayesha Noorani

The scientist has published extensively in several venues, including:

  • British Journal of Surgery
  • Diseases of the Esophagus
  • Nature Medicine
  • eJHaem
  • Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

John M. Bennett has also contributed to book publications. Notable books include Mob Town (2020) published by Yale University Press and The Doctor to the Dead (2020) published by University of North Carolina Press.

Among professional recognitions, John M. Bennett is a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias. French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group.

    J. M. Bennett;D. Catovsky;Marie-Theregse Daniel;G. Flandrin

  • International Scoring System for Evaluating Prognosis in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

    Peter Greenberg;Christopher Cox;Michelle M. LeBeau;Pierre Fenaux

  • Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes.

    J. M. Bennett;D. Catovsky;M. T. Daniel;G. Flandrin

  • Proposed Revised Criteria for the Classification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group

    John M. Bennett;Daniel Catovsky;Marie T. Daniel;George Flandrin

  • Revised Recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Bruce D. Cheson;John M. Bennett;Kenneth J. Kopecky;Thomas Büchner

  • Prognostic effect of weight loss prior tochemotherapy in cancer patients

    William D. Dewys;Colin Begg;Philip T. Lavin;Pierre R. Band

  • Revised International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

    Peter L. Greenberg;Heinz Tuechler;Julie Schanz;Guillermo Sanz

  • Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study.

    Pierre Fenaux;Ghulam J. Mufti;Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg;Valeria Santini

  • National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment

    Bruce D. Cheson;John M. Bennett;Michael Grever;Neil Kay

  • Decitabine improves patient outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a phase III randomized study.

    Hagop Kantarjian;Jean-Pierre J. Issa;Craig S. Rosenfeld M.D.;John M. Bennett

  • Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.

    Alan List;Gordon Dewald;John Bennett;Aristotle Giagounidis

  • Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia

    Bruce D. Cheson;Peter L. Greenberg;John M. Bennett;Bob Lowenberg

  • Diagnostic criteria and classification of mastocytosis: a consensus proposal

    Peter Valent;Hans P. Horny;Luis Escribano;B. Jack Longley

  • Granulocytic sarcoma: a clinicopathologic study of 61 biopsied cases.

    Richard S. Neiman;Maurice Barcos;Costan Berard;Hugh Bonner

  • Anthracycline Dose Intensification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Hugo F. Fernandez;Zhuoxin Sun;Xiaopan Yao;Mark R. Litzow

  • Criteria for the diagnosis of acute leukemia of megakaryocyte lineage (M7). A report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group.

    John M. Bennett;Daniel Catovsky;Marie-Therese Daniel;Georges Flandrin

  • Proposals for the classification of chronic (mature) B and T lymphoid leukaemias. French-American-British (FAB) Cooperative Group.

    J M Bennett;D Catovsky;M T Daniel;G Flandrin

  • Report of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored workshop on definitions of diagnosis and response in acute myeloid leukemia.

    B D Cheson;P A Cassileth;D R Head;C A Schiffer

  • Proposal for the recognition of minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML-MO)

    J. M. Bennett;D. Catovsky;D. Catovsky;M.-T. Daniel;G. Flandrin

  • Changes in physicians' attitudes toward telling the cancer patient

    Dennis H. Novack;Robin Plumer;Raymond L. Smith;Herbert Ochitill

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter L. Greenberg
Peter L. Greenberg Stanford University
Martin M. Oken
Martin M. Oken University of Minnesota
Ulrich Germing
Ulrich Germing Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Peter Valent
Peter Valent Medical University of Vienna
Alan F. List
Alan F. List Precision BioSciences
Jacob M. Rowe
Jacob M. Rowe Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Gordon W. Dewald
Gordon W. Dewald Mayo Clinic
Pierre Fenaux
Pierre Fenaux Université Paris Cité
Richard A. Larson
Richard A. Larson University of Chicago
Mark R. Litzow
Mark R. Litzow Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative online degrees can open up diverse career pathways in healthcare, especially for those interested in medicine but seeking flexible options. Online programs can provide faster or more accessible routes to various health professions, often making it easier to balance study with work or family responsibilities.

For aspiring healthcare administrators, the top online mha programs that are cahme accredited offer a reputable path to leadership roles in hospital management and healthcare policy. Nurses looking to advance their qualifications may consider whether the does rn to bsn require clinicals option fits their needs, as some RN to BSN programs offer coursework that eliminates traditional clinical requirements.

If pursuing an advanced nursing degree, there are accelerated routes like the fastest msn to dnp program for current nurses aiming for the highest level of clinical practice. For those seeking a less research-focused path, explore dnp programs without dissertation to find practice-based doctorates that emphasize leadership and innovation over intensive academic research.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Bennett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles