World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
58781
World Ranking
9470
National Ranking
4886

James W. Vardiman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Vardiman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 278 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James W. Vardiman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Vardiman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James W. Vardiman is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research spans several fields including Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with specific focus areas in Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Hematology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Kruppel-like factors research
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments

Among their recent publications is a 2020 paper titled "Spliceosome mutations are common in persons with myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis with RBC-transfusion-dependence and correlate with response to pomalidomide," published in the journal Leukemia.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with James W. Vardiman include:

  • Onima Chowdhury
  • Jennifer O'Sullivan
  • Nikolaos Barkas
  • Guanlin Wang
  • Gemma Buck

Their work has appeared notably in the journal Leukemia, reflecting engagement with hematological research topics.

Best Publications

  • The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia

    Daniel A. Arber;Attilio Orazi;Robert Hasserjian;Jürgen Thiele

  • The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes

    James W. Vardiman;Jüergen Thiele;Daniel A. Arber;Richard D. Brunning

  • World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting-Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997.

    Nancy Lee Harris;Elaine S. Jaffe;Jacques Diebold;Georges Flandrin

  • The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms.

    James W. Vardiman;Nancy Lee Harris;Richard D. Brunning

  • Classification and diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms: the 2008 World Health Organization criteria and point-of-care diagnostic algorithms.

    A Tefferi;J W Vardiman

  • Diagnostic criteria and classification of mastocytosis: a consensus proposal

    Peter Valent;Hans P. Horny;Luis Escribano;B. Jack Longley

  • The World Health Organization Classification of Neoplastic Diseases of the Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues Report of the Clinical Advisory Committee Meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November, 1997

    N. L. Harris;E. S. Jaffe;J. Diebold;G. Flandrin

  • Clinical and cytogenetic correlations in 63 patients with therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes and acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: further evidence for characteristic abnormalities of chromosomes no. 5 and 7.

    M M Le Beau;K S Albain;R A Larson;J W Vardiman

  • Proposals and rationale for revision of the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis: recommendations from an ad hoc international expert panel.

    Ayalew Tefferi;Juergen Thiele;Attilio Orazi;Hans Michael Kvasnicka

  • Absence of the Wild-Type Allele Predicts Poor Prognosis in Adult de Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Normal Cytogenetics and the Internal Tandem Duplication of FLT3 A Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study

    Susan P. Whitman;Kellie J. Archer;Lan Feng;Claudia Baldus

  • Adverse Prognostic Significance of KIT Mutations in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With inv(16) and t(8;21): A Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study

    Peter Paschka;Guido Marcucci;Amy S. Ruppert;Krzysztof Mrózek

  • Randomized phase 2 study of fludarabine with concurrent versus sequential treatment with rituximab in symptomatic, untreated patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9712 (CALGB 9712).

    John C. Byrd;Bercedis L. Peterson;Vicki A. Morrison;Kathleen Park

  • Clinical-cytogenetic associations in 306 patients with therapy-related myelodysplasia and myeloid leukemia: the University of Chicago series.

    Sonali M. Smith;Michelle M. Le Beau;Dezheng Huo;Theodore Karrison

  • Association of an inversion of chromosome 16 with abnormal marrow eosinophils in acute myelomonocytic leukemia. A unique cytogenetic-clinicopathological association

    M M Le Beau;R A Larson;M A Bitter;J W Vardiman

  • What determines the outcomes for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on cooperative group protocols? A comparison of Children's Cancer Group and Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies.

    Wendy Stock;Mei La;Ben Sanford;Clara D. Bloomfield

  • Nonrandom chromosome abnormalities in acute leukemia and dysmyelopoietic syndromes in patients with previously treated malignant disease

    Janet D. Rowley;Harvey M. Golomb;James W. Vardiman

  • Evidence for a 15; 17 translocation in every patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia

    Richard A Larson;Koji Kondo;James W Vardiman;Ann E Butler

  • The World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee Meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997

    N L Harris;E S Jaffe;J Diebold;G Flandrin

  • The World Health Organization Classification of Hematological Malignancies Report of the Clinical Advisory Committee Meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997

    N L Harris;E S Jaffe;J Diebold;G Flandrin

  • The World Health Organization classification of neoplasms of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting--Airlie House, Virginia, November, 1997.

    N L Harris;E S Jaffe;J Diebold;G Flandrin

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Larson
Richard A. Larson University of Chicago
Harvey M. Golomb
Harvey M. Golomb University of Chicago
Janet D. Rowley
Janet D. Rowley University of Chicago
Clara D. Bloomfield
Clara D. Bloomfield The Ohio State University
Michelle M. Le Beau
Michelle M. Le Beau University of Chicago
Mark J. Ratain
Mark J. Ratain University of Chicago
John M. Bennett
John M. Bennett University of Rochester Medical Center
Krzysztof Mrózek
Krzysztof Mrózek The Ohio State University
Nancy Lee Harris
Nancy Lee Harris World Resources Institute
Ayalew Tefferi
Ayalew Tefferi Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine doesn’t always require the traditional, on-campus route. There’s a growing demand for healthcare professionals trained through flexible, affordable online programs that offer a variety of specialties.

Many students start by exploring online nursing programs, which provide a solid foundation for both clinical and non-clinical roles. For registered nurses looking to expand their skills, the cheapest rn to bsn online options allow RNs to earn a Bachelor’s degree and unlock further advancement opportunities.

Those aiming for advanced practice can consider online nurse practitioner programs, which prepare graduates for independent, high-responsibility clinical roles. Meanwhile, nurse leaders and educators may be interested in the cheapest online dnp programs to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice.

These online degrees offer flexibility, cost savings, and a path toward diverse healthcare careers, making them an excellent complement or alternative to studying Medicine in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing James W. Vardiman

Trending Scientists