World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 154 130 77 788 125627
Medicine 155 932 531 756 129645

Clara D. Bloomfield publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Clara D. Bloomfield between 1972 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Clara D. Bloomfield published across 53 years, from 1972 to 2024, averaging 15.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2023. 37 of the 824 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2023. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 3 publications 1974: 5 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 6 publications 1977: 12 publications 1978: 10 publications 1979: 9 publications 1980: 11 publications 1981: 22 publications 1982: 15 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 29 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 30 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 11 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 27 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 32 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 32 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 36 publications 2024: 1 publication
1972 2024

824 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Clara D. Bloomfield: publications per year, 1972 to 2024
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 3
1974 5
1975 5
1976 6
1977 12
1978 10
1979 9
1980 11
1981 22
1982 15
1983 7
1984 8
1985 29
1986 5
1987 30
1988 9
1989 10
1990 11
1991 5
1992 16
1993 9
1994 9
1995 5
1996 9
1997 16
1998 14
1999 10
2000 8
2001 16
2002 10
2003 16
2004 27
2005 25
2006 23
2007 32
2008 24
2009 28
2010 17
2011 27
2012 26
2013 32
2014 26
2015 16
2016 23
2017 27
2018 26
2019 22
2020 15
2021 19
2022 1
2023 36
2024 1
Total 824
Download as CSV

Clara D. Bloomfield publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clara D. Bloomfield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 741–760 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 756 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230 756
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Clara D. Bloomfield D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clara D. Bloomfield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 154–155 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 155 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87 155
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2000 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 1995 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Clara D. Bloomfield was affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research primarily focused on the field of medicine with a significant emphasis on hematology. The scientist contributed extensively to areas such as acute myeloid leukemia research, acute lymphoblastic leukemia research, and investigations related to myeloproliferative neoplasms.

The main fields of study covered in their work included Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Subfields of study spanned hematology, molecular biology, public health, environmental and occupational health, cancer research, and genetics.

Bloomfield authored and co-authored research papers published in scientific journals and venues including:

  • Leukemia
  • Blood
  • Blood Advances
  • UNC Libraries
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Their recent publications included:

  • Clonal evolution of acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3-ITD mutation under treatment with midostaurin, 2021, Blood
  • Mutational landscape and clinical outcome of patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia and rearrangements involving 11q23/ KMT2A, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Additional gene mutations may refine the 2017 European LeukemiaNet classification in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia aged <60 years, 2020, Leukemia
  • Midostaurin reduces relapse in FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia: the Alliance CALGB 10603/RATIFY trial, 2021, Leukemia
  • Molecular landscape and prognostic impact of FLT3-ITD insertion site in acute myeloid leukemia: RATIFY study results, 2021, Leukemia

Frequently collaborating co-authors included Jessica Kohlschmidt, Richard M. Stone, Krzysztof Mrózek, John C. Byrd, and Deedra Nicolet.

Themes addressed in Bloomfield's work also covered cancer genomics and diagnostics, histone deacetylase inhibitors research, and cancer-related molecular mechanisms research.

During the course of their career, Clara D. Bloomfield received recognition through memberships and fellowships such as:

  • Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), 2000
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1995
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Best Publications

  • Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring.

    T. R. Golub;T. R. Golub;D. K. Slonim;P. Tamayo;C. Huard

  • The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia

    Daniel A. Arber;Attilio Orazi;Robert Hasserjian;Jürgen Thiele

  • The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes

    James W. Vardiman;Jüergen Thiele;Daniel A. Arber;Richard D. Brunning

  • Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel

    Hartmut Döhner;Elihu Estey;David Grimwade;Sergio Amadori

  • World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting-Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997.

    Nancy Lee Harris;Elaine S. Jaffe;Jacques Diebold;Georges Flandrin

  • Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet.

    Hartmut Dohner;Elihu H. Estey;Sergio Amadori;Frederick R. Appelbaum

  • Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461)

    John C. Byrd;Krzysztof Mrózek;Richard K. Dodge;Andrew J. Carroll

  • Midostaurin plus Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia with a FLT3 Mutation

    Richard M. Stone;Sumithra J. Mandrekar;Ben L. Sanford;Kristina Laumann

  • Aberrant CpG-island methylation has non-random and tumour-type-specific patterns.

    Joseph F. Costello;Joseph F. Costello;Michael C. Frühwald;Michael C. Frühwald;Dominic J. Smiraglia;Laura J. Rush

  • Targetable Kinase-Activating Lesions in Ph-like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

    K. G. Roberts;Y. Li;D. Payne-Turner;R. C. Harvey

  • All-trans-Retinoic Acid in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

    Martin S. Tallman;Janet W. Andersen;Charles A. Schiffer;Frederick R. Appelbaum

  • The World Health Organization Classification of Neoplastic Diseases of the Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues Report of the Clinical Advisory Committee Meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November, 1997

    N. L. Harris;E. S. Jaffe;J. Diebold;G. Flandrin

  • MicroRNA-29b induces global DNA hypomethylation and tumor suppressor gene reexpression in acute myeloid leukemia by targeting directly DNMT3A and 3B and indirectly DNMT1.

    Ramiro Garzon;Shujun Liu;Muller Fabbri;Zhongfa Liu

  • Report of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored workshop on definitions of diagnosis and response in acute myeloid leukemia.

    B D Cheson;P A Cassileth;D R Head;C A Schiffer

  • IDH1 and IDH2 Gene Mutations Identify Novel Molecular Subsets Within De Novo Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study

    Guido Marcucci;Kati Maharry;Yue-Zhong Wu;Michael D. Radmacher

  • Cytogenetics in acute leukemia

    Krzysztof Mrózek;Nyla A Heerema;Clara D Bloomfield

  • Proposals and rationale for revision of the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis: recommendations from an ad hoc international expert panel.

    Ayalew Tefferi;Juergen Thiele;Attilio Orazi;Hans Michael Kvasnicka

  • Absence of the Wild-Type Allele Predicts Poor Prognosis in Adult de Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Normal Cytogenetics and the Internal Tandem Duplication of FLT3 A Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study

    Susan P. Whitman;Kellie J. Archer;Lan Feng;Claudia Baldus

  • Frequency of Prolonged Remission Duration after High-Dose Cytarabine Intensification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Varies by Cytogenetic Subtype

    Clara D. Bloomfield;David Lawrence;John C. Byrd;Andrew Carroll

  • Adverse Prognostic Significance of KIT Mutations in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With inv(16) and t(8;21): A Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study

    Peter Paschka;Guido Marcucci;Amy S. Ruppert;Krzysztof Mrózek

Frequent Co-Authors

Krzysztof Mrózek
Krzysztof Mrózek The Ohio State University
Guido Marcucci
Guido Marcucci City Of Hope National Medical Center
Richard A. Larson
Richard A. Larson University of Chicago
Bayard L. Powell
Bayard L. Powell Wake Forest University
Michael A. Caligiuri
Michael A. Caligiuri City Of Hope National Medical Center
Richard Stone
Richard Stone Harvard University
Andrew J. Carroll
Andrew J. Carroll University of Alabama at Birmingham
Jonathan E. Kolitz
Jonathan E. Kolitz Hofstra University
John C. Byrd
John C. Byrd University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
Susan P. Whitman
Susan P. Whitman The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the healthcare landscape evolves, online degrees have become a practical option for those seeking flexibility and career advancement in the medical field. For nursing professionals aiming for leadership or advanced clinical roles, the 1 year dnp program online offers a fast-track to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree, allowing graduates to enter high-level positions in less time.

Budget-conscious students can explore affordable dnp programs without sacrificing quality, making advanced degrees more accessible. Meanwhile, those starting their nursing journey may consider online lpn programs that deliver essential skills for practical nursing roles through flexible, accelerated coursework.

Specializations are also in high demand. The mental health sector, for example, offers unique opportunities through psych np programs, preparing nurses to provide psychiatric care and address ongoing behavioral health needs. These online pathways enable students to balance their studies with work or family commitments while opening doors to diverse and rewarding healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Clara D. Bloomfield

Recently Published Articles