World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 77 18254 17148 9106 8412 622 33762

Lucy A. Godley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lucy A. Godley between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lucy A. Godley published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 19.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 186 publications in 2023. 66 of the 689 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 186. Peak 186 publications in 2023. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 186 publications 2024: 78 publications 2025: 64 publications 2026: 2 publications
1992 2026

689 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lucy A. Godley: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 3
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 2
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 3
2006 6
2007 13
2008 14
2009 15
2010 14
2011 27
2012 23
2013 21
2014 26
2015 30
2016 24
2017 15
2018 14
2019 20
2020 21
2021 30
2022 25
2023 186
2024 78
2025 64
2026 2
Total 689
Download as CSV

Lucy A. Godley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucy A. Godley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 621–640 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 622 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386 622
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Lucy A. Godley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucy A. Godley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730 77
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lucy A. Godley is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States and has made substantial contributions to the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research primarily focuses on hematology, genetics, and molecular biology, with additional work in cancer research and public health, environmental, and occupational health.

The scientist's work covers several critical topics, including:

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Research
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments

They have published extensively in prominent scientific journals. The most frequent venues for publication include:

  • Blood
  • Blood Advances
  • Haematologica
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Leukemia

Some of their recent significant papers are:

  • Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN, 2022, published in Blood
  • International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data, 2022, published in Blood
  • Genomic profiling for clinical decision making in myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia, 2022, published in Blood
  • RUNX1-mutated families show phenotype heterogeneity and a somatic mutation profile unique to germline predisposed AML, 2020, published in Blood Advances
  • Germ line DDX41 mutations define a unique subtype of myeloid neoplasms, 2022, published in Blood

Throughout their career, Lucy A. Godley has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Michael W. Drazer
  • Simone Feurstein
  • Hamish S. Scott
  • Richard A. Larson
  • Anna Brown

Best Publications

  • Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation.

    Maria E. Figueroa;Omar Abdel-Wahab;Chao Lu;Patrick S. Ward

  • Tet2 loss leads to increased hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and myeloid transformation.

    Kelly Moran-Crusio;Linsey Reavie;Alan Shih;Omar Abdel-Wahab

  • Dnmt3a is essential for hematopoietic stem cell differentiation.

    Grant A. Challen;Deqiang Sun;Mira Jeong;Min Luo

  • Selective chemical labeling reveals the genome-wide distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine

    Chun Xiao Song;Keith E. Szulwach;Ye Fu;Qing Dai

  • TET2 Inactivation Results in Pleiotropic Hematopoietic Abnormalities in Mouse and Is a Recurrent Event during Human Lymphomagenesis

    Cyril Quivoron;Cyril Quivoron;Cyril Quivoron;Lucile Couronné;Lucile Couronné;Lucile Couronné;Véronique Della Valle;Véronique Della Valle;Véronique Della Valle;Cécile K. Lopez;Cécile K. Lopez;Cécile K. Lopez

  • 5-hmC–mediated epigenetic dynamics during postnatal neurodevelopment and aging

    Keith E. Szulwach;Xuekun Li;Yujing Li;Chun Xiao Song

  • Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis

    Lambert Busque;Jay P Patel;Maria E Figueroa;Aparna Vasanthakumar

  • Results from a randomized trial of salvage chemotherapy followed by lestaurtinib for patients with FLT3 mutant AML in first relapse

    Mark Levis;Farhad Ravandi;Eunice S. Wang;Maria R. Baer

  • Inherited and Somatic Defects in DDX41 in Myeloid Neoplasms.

    Chantana Polprasert;Isabell Schulze;Mikkael Sekeres;Hideki Makishima

  • Multicenter Study of Decitabine Administered Daily for 5 Days Every 4 Weeks to Adults With Myelodysplastic Syndromes: The Alternative Dosing for Outpatient Treatment (ADOPT) Trial

    David P. Steensma;Maria R. Baer;James L. Slack;Rena Buckstein

  • Therapy-related myeloid leukemia.

    Lucy A. Godley;Richard A. Larson

  • Germline ETV6 mutations in familial thrombocytopenia and hematologic malignancy

    Michael Y. Zhang;Jane E. Churpek;Siobán B. Keel;Tom Walsh

  • Microbial signals drive pre-leukaemic myeloproliferation in a Tet2-deficient host.

    Marlies Meisel;Reinhard Hinterleitner;Alain Pacis;Li Chen

  • Deficiency of p53 accelerates mammary tumorigenesis in Wnt-1 transgenic mice and promotes chromosomal instability.

    Lawrence A. Donehower;Lucy A. Godley;Lucy A. Godley;Claudio M Aldaz;Ruth Pyle

  • Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms: when genetics and environment collide.

    Megan E. McNerney;Lucy A. Godley;Michelle M. Le Beau

  • Large conserved domains of low DNA methylation maintained by Dnmt3a.

    Mira Jeong;Deqiang Sun;Min Luo;Yun Huang

  • Fumarate and Succinate Regulate Expression of Hypoxia-Inducible Genes via TET Enzymes

    Tuomas Laukka;Christopher J. Mariani;Tuukka Ihantola;John Z. Cao

  • DNA Hydroxymethylation Profiling Reveals that WT1 Mutations Result in Loss of TET2 Function in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Raajit Rampal;Altuna Alkalin;Altuna Alkalin;Jozef Madzo;Aparna Vasanthakumar

  • Genomic analysis of germ line and somatic variants in familial myelodysplasia/acute myeloid leukemia.

    Jane E. Churpek;Khateriaa Pyrtel;Krishna Latha Kanchi;Jin Shao

  • Geriatric assessment to predict survival in older allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients.

    Lori S. Muffly;Masha Kocherginsky;Wendy Stock;Quynh Chu

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Larson
Richard A. Larson University of Chicago
Amittha Wickrema
Amittha Wickrema University of Chicago
Michelle M. Le Beau
Michelle M. Le Beau University of Chicago
Maria R. Baer
Maria R. Baer University of Maryland, Baltimore
Hamish S. Scott
Hamish S. Scott University of Adelaide
Hagop M. Kantarjian
Hagop M. Kantarjian The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Chuan He
Chuan He University of Chicago
Ari Melnick
Ari Melnick Cornell University
David P. Steensma
David P. Steensma Harvard University
Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Guillermo Garcia-Manero The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancements in digital education have opened new routes to medical and healthcare careers. Many students who are interested in medicine but may not want to pursue a traditional MD program are now exploring related online degrees to kickstart or expand their healthcare careers.

Popular online options include the him associate degree online, which trains students for roles in health information management, a crucial part of modern healthcare systems. For those interested in clerical or administrative healthcare roles, the medical coding certification provides a fast track to entering the workforce as a medical billing and coding specialist.

Nursing is another sought-after area, with flexible and affordable study options such as the cheapest online fnp program for those who wish to become Family Nurse Practitioners. There are also cheapest online accelerated bsn programs for individuals with a non-nursing bachelor’s, allowing for a swift transition into the nursing field.

These online degrees offer convenience, lower tuition, and quick entry into high-demand healthcare professions, making them attractive alternatives or complements to traditional medical pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Lucy A. Godley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles