World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 107 443 389 285 245 354 48117

E. Mark Cummings publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by E. Mark Cummings between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. E. Mark Cummings published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2014. 11 of the 377 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2014. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 5 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 6 publications
1976 2025

377 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
E. Mark Cummings: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 3
1984 5
1985 2
1986 6
1987 4
1988 1
1989 5
1990 7
1991 7
1992 6
1993 3
1994 10
1995 5
1996 2
1997 4
1998 4
1999 4
2000 2
2001 5
2002 12
2003 8
2004 10
2005 5
2006 8
2007 12
2008 14
2009 19
2010 15
2011 14
2012 9
2013 13
2014 28
2015 9
2016 13
2017 21
2018 15
2019 11
2020 10
2021 11
2022 12
2023 9
2024 5
2025 6
Total 377
Download as CSV

E. Mark Cummings publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Mark Cummings sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 351–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 354 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69 354
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

E. Mark Cummings D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Mark Cummings sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46 107
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

E. Mark Cummings is affiliated with the University of Notre Dame in the United States. Their research primarily centers on psychology and social sciences, with extensive work in clinical psychology, social psychology, sociology and political science, demography, and public health.

Their scholarly output comprises a significant number of publications, covering topics such as child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, attachment and relationship dynamics, family dynamics and relationships, migration, health and trauma, child abuse and trauma, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, as well as resilience and mental health.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Longitudinal pathways of family influence on child self-regulation: The roles of parenting, family expressiveness, and maternal sensitive guidance in the context of child maltreatment. (2020, Developmental Psychology)
  • The Vestiges of Childhood Interparental Conflict: Adolescent Sensitization to Recent Interparental Conflict (2020, Child Development)
  • Latent classes in preschoolers' internal working models of attachment and emotional security: Roles of family risk (2022, Development and Psychopathology)
  • Intimate partner violence and maltreated preschoolers' internal representations of conflict. (2020, Journal of Family Psychology)
  • Youth in Northern Ireland: Linking Violence Exposure, Emotional Insecurity, and the Political Macrosystem (2020, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with E. Mark Cummings include Patrick T. Davies, Christine E. Merrilees, Sarah Hoegler Dennis, Laura K. Taylor, and Marcie C. Goeke-Morey.

Their work is frequently published in the following journals:

  • Journal of Family Psychology
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Child Development
  • Family Process
  • Developmental Psychology

With a total of 71 publications in psychology and 43 in social sciences, their research spans several interrelated fields, with a focus on the interplay between family environments, emotional development, and psychosocial outcomes in children and adolescents.

Cummings was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2004, reflecting their professional standing within the discipline.

Best Publications

  • Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis.

    Patrick T. Davies;E. Mark Cummings

  • Maternal Depression and Child Development

    E. Mark Cummings;Patrick T. Davies

  • Developmental Psychopathology and Family Process: Theory, Research, and Clinical Implications

    E. Mark Cummings;Patrick Davies;Susan B. Campbell;Dante Cicchetti

  • Effects of marital conflict on children: recent advances and emerging themes in process‐oriented research

    E. Mark Cummings;Patrick T. Davies

  • Children and Marital Conflict: The Impact of Family Dispute and Resolution

    E. Mark Cummings;P. H. O'Connor Davies;Robert E. Emery

  • Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention.

    Mark T. Greenberg;Dante Cicchetti;E. Mark Cummings

  • A secure base from which to explore close relationships.

    Everett Waters;E. Mark Cummings

  • Patterns of Attachment in Two- and Three-Year-Olds in Normal Families and Families with Parental Depression.

    Marian Radke-Yarrow;E. Mark Cummings;Leon Kuczynski;Michael Chapman

  • Marital Conflict and Children: An Emotional Security Perspective

    E. Mark Cummings;Patrick T. Davies

  • Towards a family process model of maternal and paternal depressive symptoms: exploring multiple relations with child and family functioning.

    E. Mark Cummings;Peggy S. Keller;Patrick T. Davies

  • Young Children's Responses to Expressions of Anger and Affection by Others in the Family.

    E. Mark Cummings;Carolyn Zahn-Waxler;Marian Radke-Yarrow

  • Child Emotional Security and Interparental Conflict

    Patrick T. Davies;Gordon T. Harold;Marcie C. Goeke-Morey;E. Mark Cummings

  • Exploring children's emotional security as a mediator of the link between marital relations and child adjustment

    Patrick T. Davies;E. Mark Cummings

  • Attachment in the preschool years

    M T Greenberg;Dante Cicchetti;E M Cummings

  • Influence of conflict between adults on the emotions and aggression of young children.

    E. Mark Cummings;Ronald J. Iannotti;Carolyn Zahn-Waxler

  • Emotional security as a regulatory process in normal development and the development of psychopathology

    E. Mark Cummings;Patrick Davies

  • Marital conflict, gender, and children's appraisals and coping efficacy as mediators of child adjustment.

    E. Mark Cummings;Patrick T. Davies;Kelly S. Simpson

  • Coping with background anger in early childhood.

    E. Mark Cummings

  • III. Study 2: Relations Between Interparental Conflict, Child Emotional Security, and Adjustment in the Context of Cognitive Appraisals

    Patrick T. Davies;Gordon Thomas Harold;Marcie C. Goeke-Morey;E. Mark Cummings

  • Children's responses to different forms of expression of anger between adults.

    E. Mark Cummings;Dena Vogel;Jennifer S. Cummings;Mona El-Sheikh

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick T. Davies
Patrick T. Davies University of Rochester
Marcie C. Goeke-Morey
Marcie C. Goeke-Morey Catholic University of America
Peter Shirlow
Peter Shirlow University of Liverpool
Ed Cairns
Ed Cairns University of Ulster
Mona El-Sheikh
Mona El-Sheikh Auburn University
Chrystyna D. Kouros
Chrystyna D. Kouros Southern Methodist University
Dante Cicchetti
Dante Cicchetti University of Minnesota
Melissa L. Sturge-Apple
Melissa L. Sturge-Apple University of Rochester
Carolyn Zahn-Waxler
Carolyn Zahn-Waxler University of Wisconsin–Madison
Katherine Helen Shelton
Katherine Helen Shelton Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to varied career pathways, including high-demand fields such as substance abuse counseling. Earning an online psychology degree can prepare you for a range of professional roles and also provides the flexibility to specialize further.

For those interested in becoming a counselor, educational requirements can vary by location and employer. To get a closer look at specific needs, check out what’s required for St. Louis substance abuse counselors education requirements, as well as St. Petersburg substance abuse counselors education requirements, which detail certification processes and degree expectations.

Aspiring counselors can also review Stockton substance abuse counselors education requirements and Tampa substance abuse counselors education requirements to understand local regulations, practicum guidelines, and advancement opportunities. Many online psychology programs are designed with these pathways in mind, preparing students for licensure and real-world practice.

By researching these regional education requirements and selecting an accredited program, you can take confident steps toward a meaningful career in mental health and behavioral support.

Best Scientists Citing E. Mark Cummings

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles