World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
79
Citations
31057
World Ranking
1486
National Ranking
888

Patrick T. Davies publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick T. Davies sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 255 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Patrick T. Davies D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick T. Davies sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick T. Davies is affiliated with the University of Rochester in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychological and social sciences, with a notable emphasis on clinical and social psychology, as well as demography and experimental cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work largely explores topics related to child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, attachment and relationship dynamics, family dynamics and relationships, child abuse and trauma, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, cognitive abilities and testing, and neuroendocrine regulation and behavior.

Recent publications by Patrick T. Davies include:

  • The interparental relationship: Meta-analytic associations with children's maladjustment and responses to interparental conflict (2020), Psychological Bulletin
  • Coparental discord and children's behavior problems: Children's negative family representations as an explanatory mechanism (2020), Journal of Family Psychology
  • The cognitive costs and advantages of children's exposure to parental relationship instability: Testing an evolutionary-developmental hypothesis (2022), Developmental Psychology
  • Children's dove temperament as a differential susceptibility factor in child rearing contexts (2021), Developmental Psychology
  • Understanding how and why effortful control moderates children's vulnerability to interparental conflict (2020), Developmental Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Davies include:

  • Melissa L. Sturge-Apple
  • Morgan J. Thompson
  • Zhi Li
  • Vanessa T. Cao
  • Jesse L. Coe

Patrick T. Davies publishes regularly in several key academic journals, with the most frequent publication venues being:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Development and Psychopathology
  • Journal of Family Psychology
  • Child Development
  • Journal of Child and Family Studies

In addition to journal articles, Davies has contributed to book publications, including a title released by Cambridge University Press:

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Disorders (2020)

Best Publications

  • Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis.

    Patrick T. Davies;E. Mark Cummings

  • Clinical Characteristics of 58 Children With a Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome Temporally Associated With SARS-CoV-2.

    Elizabeth Whittaker;Elizabeth Whittaker;Alasdair Bamford;Alasdair Bamford;Julia Kenny;Julia Kenny;Myrsini Kaforou

  • Maternal Depression and Child Development

    E. Mark Cummings;Patrick T. Davies

  • Developmental Psychopathology and Family Process: Theory, Research, and Clinical Implications

    E. Mark Cummings;Patrick Davies;Susan B. Campbell;Dante Cicchetti

  • Effects of marital conflict on children: recent advances and emerging themes in process‐oriented research

    E. Mark Cummings;Patrick T. Davies

  • Marital Conflict and Children: An Emotional Security Perspective

    E. Mark Cummings;Patrick T. Davies

  • Towards a family process model of maternal and paternal depressive symptoms: exploring multiple relations with child and family functioning.

    E. Mark Cummings;Peggy S. Keller;Patrick T. Davies

  • Child Emotional Security and Interparental Conflict

    Patrick T. Davies;Gordon T. Harold;Marcie C. Goeke-Morey;E. Mark Cummings

  • Exploring children's emotional security as a mediator of the link between marital relations and child adjustment

    Patrick T. Davies;E. Mark Cummings

  • Emotional security as a regulatory process in normal development and the development of psychopathology

    E. Mark Cummings;Patrick Davies

  • Marital conflict, gender, and children's appraisals and coping efficacy as mediators of child adjustment.

    E. Mark Cummings;Patrick T. Davies;Kelly S. Simpson

  • Gender-Specific Pathways Between Maternal Depressive Symptoms, Family Discord, and Adolescent Adjustment

    Patrick T. Davies;Michael Windle

  • III. Study 2: Relations Between Interparental Conflict, Child Emotional Security, and Adjustment in the Context of Cognitive Appraisals

    Patrick T. Davies;Gordon Thomas Harold;Marcie C. Goeke-Morey;E. Mark Cummings

  • Intensive care admissions of children with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS) in the UK: a multicentre observational study

    Patrick Davies;Claire Evans;Hari Krishnan Kanthimathinathan;Jon Lillie

  • Interparental Discord and Child Adjustment: Prospective Investigations of Emotional Security as an Explanatory Mechanism

    E. Mark Cummings;Alice C. Schermerhorn;Patrick T. Davies;Marcie C. Goeke-Morey

  • Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions.

    Cornelia Betsch;Noel T. Brewer;Pauline Brocard;Patrick Davies

  • Interparental conflict and adolescent adjustment: why does gender moderate early adolescent vulnerability?

    Patrick T. Davies;Lisa L. Lindsay

  • Constructive and destructive marital conflict, emotional security and children's prosocial behavior.

    Kathleen McCoy;E. Mark Cummings;Patrick T. Davies

  • Impact of Hostility and Withdrawal in Interparental Conflict on Parental Emotional Unavailability and Children's Adjustment Difficulties

    Melissa L. Sturge-Apple;Patrick T. Davies;E. Mark Cummings

  • Pathways between profiles of family functioning, child security in the interparental subsystem, and child psychological problems

    Patrick T. Davies;E. Mark Cummings;Marcia A. Winter

Frequent Co-Authors

E. Mark Cummings
E. Mark Cummings University of Notre Dame
Melissa L. Sturge-Apple
Melissa L. Sturge-Apple University of Rochester
Dante Cicchetti
Dante Cicchetti University of Minnesota
Marcie C. Goeke-Morey
Marcie C. Goeke-Morey Catholic University of America
Michael Windle
Michael Windle Emory University
Katherine Helen Shelton
Katherine Helen Shelton Cardiff University
Gordon Thomas Harold
Gordon Thomas Harold University of Cambridge
Evan M. Forman
Evan M. Forman Drexel University
Peter Prinzie
Peter Prinzie Erasmus University Rotterdam
Mona El-Sheikh
Mona El-Sheikh Auburn University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens up a wide range of options, especially with the flexibility provided by online degrees. Many students explore programs nationwide to find the best fit for their goals and schedules. For those interested in traditional and hybrid learning in the Pacific Northwest, you can explore the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Seattle for high-quality academic offerings.

If you’re drawn to the South, the top-ranked psychology degree programs in University, MS provide robust options for both undergraduate and graduate study. Across the nation, the top-ranked psychology degree programs in USA showcase the diversity and excellence available for future professionals in this field.

Additionally, for those seeking flexibility without sacrificing value, choosing an online program is key. The most valuable online psychology degree programs ranking in Philadelphia highlights top-rated programs that deliver affordability and strong career outcomes. Whether you study on-campus or online, psychology degrees open doors to careers in counseling, research, human resources, education, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick T. Davies

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles