World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
3872
World Ranking
10962
National Ranking
122

Nicolas Favez publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas Favez sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 240 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nicolas Favez D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas Favez sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Parental Burnout Around the Globe: a 42-Country Study

    Isabelle Roskam;Joyce Aguiar;Ege Akgun;Gizem Arikan

  • The Development of Family Alliance From Pregnancy to Toddlerhood and Child Outcomes at 5 Years.

    Nicolas Favez;Francesco Lopes;Mathieu Bernard

  • Psychological Factors Involved in Sexual Desire, Sexual Activity, and Sexual Satisfaction: A Multi-factorial Perspective.

    Alessandra Dosch;Lucien Rochat;Paolo Ghisletta;Nicolas Favez

  • The development of the family alliance from pregnancy to toddlerhood and children outcomes at 18 months

    N. Favez;N. Favez;F. Frascarolo;C. Carneiro;V. Montfort

  • The Family Alliance Assessment Scales: Steps Toward Validity and Reliability of an Observational Assessment Tool for Early Family Interactions

    Nicolas Favez;Chloé Lavanchy Scaiola;Hervé Tissot;Joëlle Darwiche

  • Four‐month‐olds Make Triangular Bids to Father and Mother During Trilogue Play with Still‐face

    E. Fivaz‐Depeursinge;N. Favez;S. Lavanchy;S. De Noni

  • Parental and Family Factors Associated with Problematic Gaming and Problematic Internet Use in Adolescents: a Systematic Literature Review

    Philip Nielsen;Nicolas Favez;Henk Rigter

  • Exploring Triangulation in Infancy: Two Contrasted Cases

    Elisabeth Fivaz‐Depeursinge;Nicolas Favez

  • Further insights on the French WISC-IV factor structure through Bayesian structural equation modeling.

    Philippe Golay;Isabelle Reverte;Jérôme Rossier;Nicolas Favez

  • Linking parental mediation practices to adolescents’ problematic online screen use: A systematic literature review

    Philip Nielsen;Nicolas Favez;Howard Liddle;Henk Rigter

  • Systemic Analysis of Father-Mother-Baby Interactions: The Lausanne Triadic Play

    Antoinette Corboz‐Warnery;Elisabeth Fivaz‐Depeursinge;Christine Gertsch Bettens;Nicolas Favez

  • Family Alliance Stability and Change From Pregnancy to Toddlerhood and Marital Correlates

    Nicolas Favez;Elisabeth Fivaz-Depeursinge

  • Co‐Parenting Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

    Cindy Eira Nunes;Yves de Roten;Nahema El Ghaziri;Nicolas Favez

  • Prenatal Representations of Family in Parents and Coparental Interactions as Predictors of Triadic Interactions During Infancy

    Nicolas Favez;ChloÉ Lavanchy Scaiola;Antoinette Corboz-Warnery

  • Hierarchy of interactive functions in father‐mother‐baby three‐way games

    Nicolas Favez;Claudio Carneiro;Elisabeth Fivaz-Depeursinge

  • Parenting Culture(s): Ideal-Parent Beliefs Across 37 Countries

    Unknown

  • Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

    Anita Lyubenova;Dipika Neupane;Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Yin Wu

  • Multidimensional family therapy reduces problematic gaming in adolescents: A randomised controlled trial.

    Philip R Nielsen;Maxwell Christensen;Craig Henderson;Howard A Liddle

  • A longitudinal study of parental depressive symptoms and coparenting in the first 18 months

    Hervé Tissot;Nicolas Favez;Paolo Ghisletta

  • Coparenting and toddler's interactive styles in family coalitions.

    Elisabeth Fivaz-Depeursinge;Francesco Lopes;Maryline Python;Nicolas Favez

Frequent Co-Authors

Jérôme Rossier
Jérôme Rossier University of Lausanne
Paolo Ghisletta
Paolo Ghisletta University of Geneva
James P. McHale
James P. McHale University of South Florida St. Petersburg
François Herrmann
François Herrmann University of Geneva
Howard A. Liddle
Howard A. Liddle University of Miami
Alan Stein
Alan Stein University of Oxford
Louise M. Howard
Louise M. Howard King's College London
Martial Van der Linden
Martial Van der Linden University of Geneva
Mark E. Feinberg
Mark E. Feinberg Pennsylvania State University
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Nicolas Favez

Recently Published Articles