World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
7854
World Ranking
10368
National Ranking
148

Stijn Van Petegem publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stijn Van Petegem sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stijn Van Petegem D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stijn Van Petegem sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stijn Van Petegem is affiliated with the Université Libre de Bruxelles in Belgium. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a particular emphasis on clinical psychology, sociology and political science, social psychology, education, and demography.

Their work focuses on several main topics within child and adolescent development and family dynamics. These include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Family and Disability Support Research

Stijn Van Petegem has contributed to numerous publications and frequently publishes in venues related to youth and family psychology. The most recurrent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Child and Family Studies
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
  • Journal of Family Psychology
  • Journal of Family Issues

Some of their recent papers reflecting their research interests are:

  • "Putting parental overprotection into a family systems context: Relations of overprotective parenting with perceived coparenting and adolescent anxiety" (2021, Family Process)
  • "Police procedural justice and adolescents' internalization of the law: Integrating self-determination theory into legal socialization research" (2021, Journal of Social Issues)

Additional related recent papers by collaborators or in the same field include:

  • "How Do Adolescents Manage Information in the Relationship with Their Parents? A Latent Class Analysis of Disclosure, Keeping Secrets, and Lying" (2022, Journal of Youth and Adolescence)
  • "Overprotective parenting and social anxiety in adolescents: The role of emotion regulation" (2023, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships)
  • "Live well and die with inner peace: The importance of retrospective need-based experiences, ego integrity and despair for late adults' death attitudes" (2020, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics)

Their frequent coauthors, with whom they have collaborated multiple times, are:

  • Grégoire Zimmermann
  • Jean-Philippe Antonietti
  • Bénédicte Mouton
  • Bart Soenens
  • Gillian Albert Sznitman

Overall, Stijn Van Petegem's scholarly contributions engage with the complexities of family relationships, adolescent psychosocial development, and the interplay between parenting practices and youth outcomes within social and clinical psychological frameworks.

Best Publications

  • Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures

    Beiwen Chen;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Wim Beyers;Liesbet Boone

  • Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students' motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation

    Leen Haerens;Nathalie Aelterman;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Bart Soenens

  • Let Us Not Throw Out the Baby With the Bathwater: Applying the Principle of Universalism Without Uniformity to Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling Parenting

    Bart Soenens;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Stijn Van Petegem

  • Rebels With a Cause? Adolescent Defiance From the Perspective of Reactance Theory and Self-Determination Theory

    Stijn Van Petegem;Bart Soenens;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Wim Beyers

  • On the association between adolescent autonomy and psychosocial functioning: examining decisional independence from a self-determination theory perspective.

    Stijn Van Petegem;Wim Beyers;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Bart Soenens

  • Perceived Maternal Autonomy Support and Early Adolescent Emotion Regulation: A Longitudinal Study

    Katrijn Brenning;Bart Soenens;Stijn Van Petegem;Maarten Vansteenkiste

  • Personal identity processes from adolescence through the late 20s : age trends, functionality, and depressive symptoms

    Koen Luyckx;Theo A. Klimstra;Bart Duriez;Stijn Van Petegem

  • Longitudinal Associations between Adolescent Perceived Degree and Style of Parental Prohibition and Internalization and Defiance.

    Maarten Vansteenkiste;Bart Soenens;Stijn Van Petegem;Bart Duriez

  • Why do the lonely stay lonely? Chronically lonely adolescents' attributions and emotions in situations of social inclusion and exclusion

    Janne Vanhalst;Bart Soenens;Koen Luyckx;Stijn Van Petegem

  • Where Do the Cultural Differences in Dynamics of Controlling Parenting Lie? Adolescents as Active Agents in the Perception of and Coping with Parental Behavior

    Beiwen Chen;Bart Soenens;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Stijn Van Petegem

  • Do students with different motives for physical education respond differently to autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching?

    Jotie De Meyer;Bart Soenens;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Nathalie Aelterman

  • The jingle-jangle fallacy in adolescent autonomy in the family: in search of an underlying structure.

    Stijn Van Petegem;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Wim Beyers

  • Perceived parenting and adolescent cyber-bullying: examining the intervening role of autonomy and relatedness need satisfaction, empathic concern and recognition of humanness

    Kyriaki Fousiani;Panagiota Dimitropoulou;Michalis P. Michaelides;Stijn Van Petegem

  • The Relationship between Maternal Overprotection, Adolescent Internalizing and Externalizing Problems, and Psychological Need Frustration: A Multi-Informant Study Using Response Surface Analysis

    Stijn Van Petegem;Jean-Philippe Antonietti;Cindy Eira Nunes;Evie Kins

  • Autonomy in Family Decision Making for Chinese Adolescents: Disentangling the Dual Meaning of Autonomy

    Beiwen Chen;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Wim Beyers;Bart Soenens

  • Personal identity processes and self-esteem : Temporal sequences in high school and college students

    Koen Luyckx;Theo A. Klimstra;Bart Duriez;Stijn Van Petegem

  • Does parental autonomy support relate to adolescent autonomy? An in-depth examination of a seemingly simple question

    Kyriaki Fousiani;Stijn Van Petegem;Bart Soenens;Maarten Vansteenkiste

  • Does General Parenting Context Modify Adolescents' Appraisals and Coping with a Situation of Parental Regulation? The Case of Autonomy-Supportive Parenting

    Stijn Van Petegem;Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck;Bart Soenens;Maarten Vansteenkiste

  • Examining the Longitudinal Association between Oppositional Defiance and Autonomy in Adolescence.

    Stijn Van Petegem;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Bart Soenens;Wim Beyers

  • Autonomy in Adolescent Development : Towards Conceptual Clarity

    Bart Soenens;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Stijn Van Petegem

Frequent Co-Authors

Bart Soenens
Bart Soenens Ghent University
Maarten Vansteenkiste
Maarten Vansteenkiste Ghent University
Wim Beyers
Wim Beyers Ghent University
Koen Luyckx
Koen Luyckx KU Leuven
Bart Duriez
Bart Duriez KU Leuven
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck Griffith University
Nathalie Aelterman
Nathalie Aelterman Ghent University
Theo A. Klimstra
Theo A. Klimstra Tufts University
Richard M. Ryan
Richard M. Ryan Australian Catholic University
Luc Goossens
Luc Goossens KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA can open doors to a range of online degrees and career options, especially for those interested in helping professions. Many students choose to pursue related fields, such as social work, which offers strong job prospects and the flexibility of online study. Accelerated programs are growing in popularity, allowing graduates to enter the workforce more quickly.

If you’re considering alternate or complementary pathways, some of the fastest online social work degrees in California provide comprehensive training for roles in counseling, case management, and advocacy. For East Coast learners, the fastest online social work degrees in Massachusetts present regionally tailored coursework that can help accelerate your career.

Those aiming for advanced credentials might explore the fastest online social work master's programs in Boise to deepen their expertise and broaden their employment opportunities. Similarly, options like accelerated online social work degrees in Tennessee make it possible to complete degrees more efficiently, so you can make a difference sooner. With flexible online offerings, the path from psychology education to a rewarding human services career is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Stijn Van Petegem

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles