World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 47 6491 6302 865 859 197 8899

Rui Yan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rui Yan between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rui Yan published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 23.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 66 publications in 2023. 84 of the 380 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 66. Peak 66 publications in 2023. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 10 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 39 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 46 publications 2023: 66 publications 2024: 47 publications 2025: 37 publications
2010 2025

380 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rui Yan: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 8
2012 6
2013 8
2014 1
2015 10
2016 14
2017 11
2018 23
2019 39
2020 30
2021 33
2022 46
2023 66
2024 47
2025 37
Total 380
Download as CSV

Rui Yan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rui Yan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 192–201 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 197 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519 197
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Rui Yan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rui Yan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689 47
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rui Yan is affiliated with Renmin University of China and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of Computer Science, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their research covers several subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems, Molecular Biology, and Neurology.

The main topics of Rui Yan's work include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • AI in Service Interactions

They have contributed scholarly articles to various publication venues. The most frequent venues for their work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • ACM Transactions on Information Systems
  • Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Rui Yan has collaborated with several notable co-authors, including:

  • Dongyan Zhao
  • Xiuying Chen
  • Shen Gao
  • Chongyang Tao
  • Mingzhe Li

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Temporal trends in the prevalence of Parkinson's disease from 1980 to 2023: a systematic review and meta-analysis" (2024, The Lancet Healthy Longevity)
  • "Projections for prevalence of Parkinson's disease and its driving factors in 195 countries and territories to 2050: modelling study of Global Burden of Disease Study 2021" (2025, BMJ)
  • "Low-Resource Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation" (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • "Metrnl Alleviates Lipid Accumulation by Modulating Mitochondrial Homeostasis in Diabetic Nephropathy" (2023, Diabetes)
  • "MISC: A Mixed Strategy-Aware Model integrating COMET for Emotional Support Conversation" (2022, Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers))

The diversity of Rui Yan's publications spans artificial intelligence methodologies applied to both computational systems and biomedical contexts, demonstrating interdisciplinary integration between technology and health sciences.

Best Publications

  • Style Transfer in Text: Exploration and Evaluation

    Zhenxin Fu;Xiaoye Tan;Nanyun Peng;Dongyan Zhao

  • Relation-Aware Entity Alignment for Heterogeneous Knowledge Graphs

    Yuting Wu;Xiao Liu;Yansong Feng;Zheng Wang

  • Natural Language Inference by Tree-Based Convolution and Heuristic Matching

    Lili Mou;Rui Men;Ge Li;Yan Xu

  • Learning to Respond with Deep Neural Networks for Retrieval-Based Human-Computer Conversation System

    Rui Yan;Yiping Song;Hua Wu

  • Plan-And-Write: Towards Better Automatic Storytelling

    Lili Yao;Nanyun Peng;Ralph M. Weischedel;Kevin Knight

  • How Transferable are Neural Networks in NLP Applications

    Lili Mou;Zhao Meng;Rui Yan;Ge Li

  • Multi-view Response Selection for Human-Computer Conversation

    Xiangyang Zhou;Daxiang Dong;Hua Wu;Shiqi Zhao

  • Evolutionary timeline summarization: a balanced optimization framework via iterative substitution

    Rui Yan;Xiaojun Wan;Jahna Otterbacher;Liang Kong

  • Sequence to Backward and Forward Sequences: A Content-Introducing Approach to Generative Short-Text Conversation

    Lili Mou;Yiping Song;Rui Yan;Ge Li

  • RUBER: An Unsupervised Method for Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialog Systems

    Chongyang Tao;Lili Mou;Dongyan Zhao;Rui Yan

  • Citation count prediction: learning to estimate future citations for literature

    Rui Yan;Jie Tang;Xiaobing Liu;Dongdong Shan

  • CGMH: Constrained Sentence Generation by Metropolis-Hastings Sampling

    Ning Miao;Hao Zhou;Lili Mou;Rui Yan

  • Get The Point of My Utterance! Learning Towards Effective Responses with Multi-Head Attention Mechanism

    Chongyang Tao;Shen Gao;Mingyue Shang;Wei Wu

  • One Time of Interaction May Not Be Enough: Go Deep with an Interaction-over-Interaction Network for Response Selection in Dialogues.

    Chongyang Tao;Wei Wu;Can Xu;Wenpeng Hu

  • How to Make Context More Useful? An Empirical Study on Context-Aware Neural Conversational Models

    Zhiliang Tian;Rui Yan;Lili Mou;Yiping Song

  • Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation with Pre-trained Language Models

    Xueliang Zhao;Wei Wu;Can Xu;Chongyang Tao

  • Multi-Representation Fusion Network for Multi-Turn Response Selection in Retrieval-Based Chatbots

    Chongyang Tao;Wei Wu;Can Xu;Wenpeng Hu

  • Tweet Recommendation with Graph Co-Ranking

    Rui Yan;Mirella Lapata;Xiaoming Li

  • To better stand on the shoulder of giants

    Rui Yan;Congrui Huang;Jie Tang;Yan Zhang

  • Timeline Generation through Evolutionary Trans-Temporal Summarization

    Rui Yan;Liang Kong;Congrui Huang;Xiaojun Wan

  • OVERCOMING CATASTROPHIC FORGETTING FOR CONTINUAL LEARNING VIA MODEL ADAPTATION

    Wenpeng Hu;Zhou Lin;Bing Liu;Chongyang Tao

Frequent Co-Authors

Dongyan Zhao
Dongyan Zhao Peking University
Yansong Feng
Yansong Feng Peking University
Lili Mou
Lili Mou University of Alberta
Lidong Bing
Lidong Bing Carnegie Mellon University
Lu Zhang
Lu Zhang Peking University
Bing Liu
Bing Liu University of Illinois at Chicago
Zhaochun Ren
Zhaochun Ren Shandong University
Mirella Lapata
Mirella Lapata University of Edinburgh
Xiaohua Hu
Xiaohua Hu Drexel University
Nanyun Peng
Nanyun Peng University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of academic and career opportunities. Many students consider which programs align with the best college degrees for the future. Computer Science consistently ranks as a top field due to high demand, versatile career options, and competitive salaries.

For those interested in advancing their education online, flexibility and affordability are key factors. Some learners may seek programs like the easy masters degrees to gain specialized knowledge quickly and efficiently. Others might prioritize budget-friendly choices and explore the cheapest doctoral programs available in their field.

If your goal is to move into academic leadership or research, you may be interested in the fastest online edd programs to accelerate your career progression. Whatever your path, online degrees in Computer Science and related areas provide a variety of options to help you achieve your goals with flexibility and value.

Best Scientists Citing Rui Yan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles