World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
33093
World Ranking
15420
National Ranking
7779

Kevin D. Frick publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin D. Frick sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 413 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kevin D. Frick D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin D. Frick sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin D. Frick is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with particular contributions in epidemiology, ophthalmology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, general health professions, and public health, environmental, and occupational health.

Their work spans several interconnected fields and topics, including:

  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

Kevin D. Frick has published extensively, with notable papers such as:

  • The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020, 2021, The Lancet Global Health
  • IMI Impact of Myopia, 2021, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • Global economic productivity losses from vision impairment and blindness, 2021, EClinicalMedicine
  • The economics of vision impairment and its leading causes: A systematic review, 2022, EClinicalMedicine
  • Establishing a method to estimate the effect of antimyopia management options on lifetime cost of myopia, 2022, British Journal of Ophthalmology

The frequent co-authors most often collaborating with Kevin D. Frick include:

  • Brad Wong
  • Matthew J. Burton
  • Jacqueline Ramke
  • Ana Patrícia Marques
  • Rupert Bourne

The research output is also notable across a set of journals and publication venues, with multiple contributions in these sources:

  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • EClinicalMedicine
  • Journal of Adolescent Health
  • Ophthalmic Epidemiology
  • The Laryngoscope

Best Publications

  • Global Causes of Blindness and Distance Vision Impairment 1990-2020: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Seth R Flaxman;Rupert R A Bourne;Serge Resnikoff;Serge Resnikoff;Peter Ackland

  • Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Rupert R A Bourne;Seth R Flaxman;Tasanee Braithwaite;Maria V Cicinelli

  • The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020.

    Matthew J Burton;Matthew J Burton;Jacqueline Ramke;Jacqueline Ramke;Ana Patricia Marques;Rupert R A Bourne;Rupert R A Bourne

  • Racial variations in causes of vision loss in nursing homes: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation in Nursing Home Groups (SEEING) Study.

    David S. Friedman;Sheila K. West;Beatriz Munoz;William Park

  • A social model for health promotion for an aging population: initial evidence on the Experience Corps model.

    Linda P. Fried;Michelle C. Carlson;Marc Freedman;Kevin D. Frick

  • A Behavioral Weight-Loss Intervention in Persons with Serious Mental Illness

    Gail L. Daumit;Faith B. Dickerson;Nae Yuh Wang;Arlene Dalcin

  • Global Vision Impairment Due to Uncorrected Presbyopia

    Brien A. Holden;Timothy R. Fricke;S. May Ho;Reg Wong

  • Hospital at home: feasibility and outcomes of a program to provide hospital-level care at home for acutely ill older patients.

    Bruce Leff;Lynda Burton;Scott L. Mader;Bruce Naughton

  • Decrease in rate of myopia progression with a contact lens designed to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia: one-year results.

    Padmaja Sankaridurg;Padmaja Sankaridurg;Padmaja Sankaridurg;Brien Holden;Brien Holden;Brien Holden;Earl Smith;Earl Smith;Thomas Naduvilath;Thomas Naduvilath

  • The magnitude and cost of global blindness: an increasing problem that can be alleviated.

    Kevin D Frick;Allen Foster

  • Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of uncorrected refractive error

    T S T Smith;K D Frick;B A Holden;T R Fricke

  • Can successful aging and chronic illness coexist in the same individual? A multidimensional concept of successful aging.

    Yuchi Young;Kevin D. Frick;Elizabeth A. Phelan

  • Exploring the Effects of an “Everyday” Activity Program on Executive Function and Memory in Older Adults: Experience Corps®

    Michelle C. Carlson;Jane S. Saczynski;George W. Rebok;Teresa E. Seeman

  • Lung Cancer Screening With Helical Computed Tomography in Older Adult Smokers: A Decision and Cost-effectiveness Analysis

    Parthiv J. Mahadevia;Lee A. Fleisher;Kevin D. Frick;John Eng

  • A Review of Health-Related Workplace Productivity Loss Instruments

    Jennifer H. Lofland;Laura Pizzi;Kevin D. Frick

  • Global cost of correcting vision impairment from uncorrected refractive error

    TR Fricke;BA Holden;DA Wilson;G Schlenther

  • Potential Lost Productivity Resulting from the Global Burden of Myopia: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Modeling

    Kovin S. Naidoo;Timothy R. Fricke;Kevin D. Frick;Monica Jong

  • A Prospective Evaluation of a Protocol for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Implanted Cardiac Devices

    Saman Nazarian;Rozann Hansford;Ariel Roguin;Dorith Goldsher

  • Economic Impact of Visual Impairment and Blindness in the United States

    Kevin D. Frick;Emily W. Gower;John H. Kempen;Jennifer L. Wolff

  • Doing well by doing good: assessing the cost savings of an intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in a Hawaii hospital.

    Eugene Hsu;Della Lin;Samuel J. Evans;Kamran S. Hamid

Frequent Co-Authors

John F. P. Bridges
John F. P. Bridges The Ohio State University
Louis W. Niessen
Louis W. Niessen Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Linda P. Fried
Linda P. Fried Columbia University
Aaron A.R. Tobian
Aaron A.R. Tobian Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Sheila K. West
Sheila K. West University of Pennsylvania
George W. Rebok
George W. Rebok Johns Hopkins University
David S. Friedman
David S. Friedman Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
David W. Eisele
David W. Eisele Johns Hopkins University
Serge Resnikoff
Serge Resnikoff University of New South Wales
Teresa E. Seeman
Teresa E. Seeman University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to several online degree options and alternative career pathways in healthcare. For those already working as registered nurses, finding the cheapest rn to bsn online can be an affordable way to advance your qualifications while maintaining flexibility. Understanding the average cost of rn to bsn programs is essential for making smart financial choices and planning your educational journey.

If you are interested in leadership or research roles, earning an online nursing doctorate may be the right next step. Meanwhile, those with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree can explore direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online, which offer a unique pathway into advanced practice nursing.

With a range of online options, aspiring healthcare professionals in the US can tailor their studies to match specific career goals and personal circumstances. Investigating these online degrees helps ensure you choose the program that aligns with both your aspirations and your budget.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin D. Frick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles