World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Spain
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
16401
World Ranking
4219
National Ranking
56

Antonio M. López publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio M. López sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 186 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Antonio M. López D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio M. López sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Spain Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Spain Leader Award
  • 2009 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Antonio M. López is affiliated with the Autonomous University of Barcelona in Spain and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, with particular emphasis on computer vision and pattern recognition. Their work spans several subfields including artificial intelligence, automotive engineering, media technology, and genetics.

The primary research topics covered by López include:

  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Image Processing Techniques and Applications
  • Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods

Recent publications by Antonio M. López demonstrate a focus on autonomous driving, semantic segmentation, and artificial intelligence applications within medical imaging and intervention. Notable papers include:

  • "Multimodal End-to-End Autonomous Driving" (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
  • "Distributed Learning and Inference With Compressed Images" (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • "Exploring the effects of synthetic data generation: a case study on autonomous driving for semantic segmentation" (2025), published in The Visual Computer
  • "CIRSE Position Paper on Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Radiology" (2023), published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
  • "Co-Training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation of Semantic Segmentation Models" (2023), published in Sensors

Frequent research collaborators include José Luis Sancho Gómez, Akhil Gurram, Onay Urfalıoǧlu, Gabriel Villalonga, and Yi Xiao, indicating significant co-authorship in various domains related to López's expertise.

López's work is often disseminated in well-known venues, reflecting sustained contributions in both academic and applied aspects of computer science. These venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 44 Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva Abstracts Publication
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
  • Sensors
  • Anthropology and Ethnology Open Access Journal

Over the course of their career, López has been recognized as an ACM Senior Member since 2009, which marks a professional distinction in the computing community.

Best Publications

  • The SYNTHIA Dataset: A Large Collection of Synthetic Images for Semantic Segmentation of Urban Scenes

    German Ros;Laura Sellart;Joanna Materzynska;David Vazquez

  • CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulator

    Alexey Dosovitskiy;Germán Ros;Felipe Codevilla;Antonio M. López

  • Survey of Pedestrian Detection for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems

    David Gerónimo;Antonio M López;Angel D Sappa;Thorsten Graf

  • End-to-End Driving Via Conditional Imitation Learning

    Felipe Codevilla;Matthias Miiller;Antonio Lopez;Vladlen Koltun

  • A benchmark for endoluminal scene segmentation of colonoscopy images

    David Vázquez;David Vázquez;Jorge Bernal;F. Javier Sánchez;Gloria Fernández-Esparrach

  • Exploring the Limitations of Behavior Cloning for Autonomous Driving

    Felipe Codevilla;Eder Santana;Antonio Lopez;Adrien Gaidon

  • Road Detection Based on Illuminant Invariance

    José M Álvarez Alvarez;Antonio M Ĺopez

  • Color attributes for object detection

    Fahad Shahbaz Khan;Rao Muhammad Anwer;Joost van de Weijer;Andrew D. Bagdanov

  • Evaluation of methods for ridge and valley detection

    A.M. Lopez;F. Lumbreras;J. Serrat;J.J. Villanueva

  • Pedestrian Detection at Day/Night Time with Visible and FIR Cameras: A Comparison

    Alejandro González;Zhijie Fang;Yainuvis Socarras;Joan Serrat

  • Road scene segmentation from a single image

    Jose M. Alvarez;Theo Gevers;Yann LeCun;Antonio M. Lopez

  • Multimodal End-to-End Autonomous Driving

    Yi Xiao;Felipe Codevilla;Akhil Gurram;Onay Urfalioglu

  • Virtual and Real World Adaptationfor Pedestrian Detection

    David Vázquez;Antonio M. Lopez;Javier Marín;Daniel Ponsa

  • Learning appearance in virtual scenarios for pedestrian detection

    Javier Marin;David Vazquez;David Geronimo;Antonio M. Lopez

  • Embedded Real-time Stereo Estimation via Semi-Global Matching on the GPU

    Unknown

  • Random Forests of Local Experts for Pedestrian Detection

    Javier Marin;David Vazquez;Antonio M. Lopez;Jaume Amores

  • End-to-end Driving via Conditional Imitation Learning

    Felipe Codevilla;Matthias Müller;Antonio López;Vladlen Koltun

  • Unsupervised co-segmentation through region matching

    Jose C. Rubio;Joan Serrat;Antonio Lopez;Nikos Paragios

  • Self-supervised Domain Adaptation for Computer Vision Tasks

    Jiaolong Xu;Liang Xiao;Antonio M. Lopez

  • Coloring Action Recognition in Still Images

    Fahad Shahbaz Khan;Rao Muhammad Anwer;Joost Weijer;Andrew D. Bagdanov

  • Association Between Time to Reperfusion and Outcome Is Primarily Driven by the Time From Imaging to Reperfusion

    Marc Ribo;Carlos A. Molina;Erik Cobo;Neus Cerdà

  • Vision-Based Offline-Online Perception Paradigm for Autonomous Driving

    German Ros;Sebastian Ramos;Manuel Granados;Amir Bakhtiary

  • Multilocal creaseness based on the level-set extrinsic curvature

    Antonio M. Lôpez;David Lloret;Joan Serrat;Juan J. Villanueva

Frequent Co-Authors

Joan Serrat
Joan Serrat Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Angel D. Sappa
Angel D. Sappa Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral
Jose M. Alvarez
Jose M. Alvarez Nvidia (United States)
Joost van de Weijer
Joost van de Weijer Autonomous University of Barcelona
Theo Gevers
Theo Gevers University of Amsterdam
Fadi Dornaika
Fadi Dornaika Ikerbasque
Adrien Gaidon
Adrien Gaidon Stanford University
Vladlen Koltun
Vladlen Koltun Apple (United States)
Alexey Dosovitskiy
Alexey Dosovitskiy Google (United States)
Andrew D. Bagdanov
Andrew D. Bagdanov University of Florence

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to a wide range of related degree and career options. Many students now choose flexible learning formats, allowing them to balance work and study with programs such as the accelerated cs degree. These programs are designed for those aiming to complete their bachelor’s in less time and quickly transition into the tech industry.

For those interested in interdisciplinary fields, engineering degrees present excellent alternatives. Pursuing the online mechanical engineering degree can provide technical skills needed for robotics, manufacturing, or research roles. Similarly, environmentally conscious students often look to the cheapest online environmental science degree to start careers focused on sustainability, environmental technology, or public policy.

If your interests are more theoretical, consider the best online physics degree. Physics graduates often find roles in data analysis, AI, or scientific computing, blending physical principles with advanced computational skills. These related degrees each offer unique career pathways, empowering students to build a future in diverse and growing STEM sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio M. López

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles