World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 66 2693 2467 142 136 283 17390

Anna E. Goudriaan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anna E. Goudriaan between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anna E. Goudriaan published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 14 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2021. 34 of the 323 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2021. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 15 publications
2003 2025

323 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anna E. Goudriaan: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 2
2005 1
2006 6
2007 2
2008 5
2009 4
2010 7
2011 4
2012 18
2013 26
2014 20
2015 10
2016 13
2017 21
2018 24
2019 27
2020 19
2021 35
2022 23
2023 21
2024 19
2025 15
Total 323
Download as CSV

Anna E. Goudriaan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna E. Goudriaan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 283 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 283
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anna E. Goudriaan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna E. Goudriaan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 66
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anna E. Goudriaan is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research focuses primarily on psychology, medicine, and neuroscience, with particular emphasis on clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, epidemiology, applied psychology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Their research topics encompass substance abuse treatment and outcomes, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, digital mental health interventions, gambling behavior and treatments, functional brain connectivity studies, mental health research topics, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Among recent publications are:

  • "Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of "other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors"?" (2020) published in Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • "Advances in problematic usage of the internet research - A narrative review by experts from the European network for problematic usage of the internet" (2022) published in Comprehensive Psychiatry
  • "Therapeutic effect of psilocybin in addiction: A systematic review" (2023) published in Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "A methodological checklist for fMRI drug cue reactivity studies: development and expert consensus" (2022) published in Nature Protocols
  • "The effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on executive functioning in healthy controls: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (2021) published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Frequent co-authors include Ruth J. van Holst, Matthijs Blankers, Marleen M. de Waal, Jack Dekker, and Judy Luigjes.

Their work has appeared most frequently in the following publication venues:

  • European Addiction Research
  • Gedragstherapie.
  • Addiction
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: a comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls.

    Anna E. Goudriaan;Anna E. Goudriaan;Jaap Oosterlaan;Edwin de Beurs;Wim van den Brink

  • Decision making in pathological gambling: a comparison between pathological gamblers, alcohol dependents, persons with Tourette syndrome, and normal controls.

    Anna E. Goudriaan;Anna E. Goudriaan;Jaap Oosterlaan;Edwin de Beurs;Wim van den Brink

  • New Developments in Human Neurocognition: Clinical, Genetic, and Brain Imaging Correlates of Impulsivity and Compulsivity

    Naomi A Fineberg;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Anna E. Goudriaan;Dan J. Stein

  • Pathological gambling: a comprehensive review of biobehavioral findings.

    Anna E Goudriaan;Anna E Goudriaan;Jaap Oosterlaan;Edwin de Beurs;Wim Van den Brink

  • Why gamblers fail to win: A review of cognitive and neuroimaging findings in pathological gambling

    Ruth J. van Holst;Wim van den Brink;Dick J. Veltman;Anna E. Goudriaan

  • Decision making and binge drinking: a longitudinal study.

    Anna E. Goudriaan;Emily R. Grekin;Kenneth J. Sher

  • Impulsivity as a vulnerability factor for poor addiction treatment outcomes: A review of neurocognitive findings among individuals with substance use disorders

    Laura Stevens;Antonio Javier Verdejo-Garcia;Antonio Javier Verdejo-Garcia;Anneke Goudriaan;Herbert Roeyers

  • Brain activation patterns associated with cue reactivity and craving in abstinent problem gamblers, heavy smokers and healthy controls: an fMRI study

    Anna E Goudriaan;Michiel B de Ruiter;Michiel B de Ruiter;Wim van den Brink;Jaap Oosterlaan

  • Response perseveration and ventral prefrontal sensitivity to reward and punishment in male problem gamblers and smokers

    Michiel B de Ruiter;Michiel B de Ruiter;Michiel B de Ruiter;Dick J Veltman;Dick J Veltman;Anna E Goudriaan;Jaap Oosterlaan

  • Grey matter alterations associated with cannabis use: results of a VBM study in heavy cannabis users and healthy controls.

    Janna Cousijn;Reinout W. Wiers;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Wim van den Brink

  • Manifesto for a European research network into Problematic Usage of the Internet.

    N A Fineberg;N A Fineberg;N A Fineberg;Z Demetrovics;D J Stein;K Ioannidis

  • Effects of non-invasive neurostimulation on craving: A meta-analysis

    Jochem M. Jansen;Joost G. Daams;Maarten W.J. Koeter;Dick J. Veltman;Dick J. Veltman

  • Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective.

    Hans Jürgen Rumpf;Sophia Achab;Sophia Achab;Joël Billieux;Henrietta Bowden-Jones

  • Brain circuitry of compulsivity.

    Odile A. van den Heuvel;Odile A. van den Heuvel;Odile A. van den Heuvel;Guido van Wingen;Carles Soriano-Mas;Carles Soriano-Mas;Pino Alonso;Pino Alonso

  • Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) for addiction medicine: A consensus paper on the present state of the science and the road ahead

    Hamed Ekhtiari;Hosna Tavakoli;Giovanni Addolorato;Chris Baeken

  • Pathological gambling after bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson disease

    H M M Smeding;A E Goudriaan;E M J Foncke;P R Schuurman

  • The relationship between impulsive choice and impulsive action: a cross-species translational study

    Nienke Broos;Lianne Schmaal;Joost Wiskerke;Lennard Kostelijk

  • Reaching out towards cannabis: approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use

    Janna Cousijn;Anna E. Goudriaan;Reinout W. Wiers

  • Mega-Analysis of Gray Matter Volume in Substance Dependence: General and Substance-Specific Regional Effects

    Scott Mackey;Nicholas Allgaier;Bader Chaarani;Philip Spechler

  • The role of self-reported impulsivity and reward sensitivity versus neurocognitive measures of disinhibition and decision-making in the prediction of relapse in pathological gamblers.

    A. E. Goudriaan;J. Oosterlaan;E. De Beurs;W. Van Den Brink

Frequent Co-Authors

Wim van den Brink
Wim van den Brink University of Amsterdam
Dick J. Veltman
Dick J. Veltman Amsterdam UMC
Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Valentina Lorenzetti
Valentina Lorenzetti Australian Catholic University
Janna Cousijn
Janna Cousijn Erasmus University Rotterdam
Lianne Schmaal
Lianne Schmaal University of Melbourne
Murat Yücel
Murat Yücel QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Jaap Oosterlaan
Jaap Oosterlaan University of Amsterdam
Nadia Solowij
Nadia Solowij University of Wollongong
Rocío Martín-Santos
Rocío Martín-Santos University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA often leads students to consider related fields and online programs that open diverse career pathways. The field of Social Work, in particular, is closely aligned with Psychology, sharing many foundational concepts and career outcomes. Prospective students interested in advanced credentials can explore the best online dsw degrees in America, which prepare graduates for leadership and specialized clinical roles.

For those in specific regions, there are robust options such as the best online social work degree programs in Florida and the best online social work degrees in Massachusetts. These regionally focused programs are designed to meet local licensing requirements and address state-specific career opportunities, making them an excellent option for students planning to work in a particular state.

If you are looking for a broader selection of regional online programs, the best online social work programs in the Northeast present a variety of accredited pathways. These degrees can help psychology students expand their expertise, meet requirements for clinical practice, and pursue roles in counseling, administration, and community support.

Best Scientists Citing Anna E. Goudriaan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles