World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Tabbye M. Chavous publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tabbye M. Chavous between 1997 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tabbye M. Chavous published across 27 years, from 1997 to 2023, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 2019. 4 of the 53 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 2019. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications
1997 2023

53 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tabbye M. Chavous: publications per year, 1997 to 2023
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 3
1999 1
2000 2
2001 0
2002 3
2003 3
2004 2
2005 1
2006 1
2007 1
2008 2
2009 2
2010 0
2011 4
2012 2
2013 2
2014 0
2015 1
2016 1
2017 2
2018 3
2019 5
2020 2
2021 5
2022 2
2023 2
Total 53
Download as CSV

Tabbye M. Chavous publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tabbye M. Chavous sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tabbye M. Chavous D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tabbye M. Chavous sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tabbye M. Chavous is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with notable focus on subfields such as sociology and political science, education, general health professions, safety research, and clinical psychology.

Their work centers on topics including:

  • Racial and ethnic identity research
  • Early childhood education and development
  • Career development and diversity
  • Higher education research studies
  • Child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development
  • Maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum
  • Birth, development, and health

Tabbye M. Chavous has contributed to several recent publications, which include:

  • "A Daily Examination of African American Adolescents' Racial Discrimination, Parental Racial Socialization, and Psychological Affect," 2020, Child Development
  • "Parental Educational Attainment, the Superior Temporal Cortical Surface Area, and Reading Ability among American Children: A Test of Marginalization-Related Diminished Returns," 2021, Children
  • "A risk-benefit framework for human research during the COVID-19 pandemic," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Graduate bridge programs as nepantla for minoritized students in STEM: Navigating challenges with non-bridge peers and faculty," 2021, Journal of Diversity in Higher Education
  • ""Our Community Is So Small": Considering Intraracial Peer Networks in Black Student Adjustment and Belonging at PWIs," 2022, American Educational Research Journal

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • N. S. Wigginton
  • Seanna Leath
  • Tiffany Yip
  • Bridget L. Cheeks
  • Robert M. Sellers

Tabbye M. Chavous has published in several academic venues, notably:

  • Child Development
  • Children
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Journal of Diversity in Higher Education
  • American Educational Research Journal

Best Publications

  • Multidimensional Model of Racial Identity: A Reconceptualization of African American Racial Identity:

    Robert M. Sellers;Mia A. Smith;J. Nicole Shelton;Stephanie A.J. Rowley

  • Multidimensional Inventory of Black Identity: A Preliminary Investigation of Reliability and Construct Validity

    Robert M. Sellers;Stephanie A. J. Rowley;Stephanie A. J. Rowley;Tabbye M. Chavous;J. Nicole Shelton

  • Racial identity and academic attainment among African American adolescents.

    Tabbye M. Chavous;Debra Hilkene Bernat;Karen Schmeelk-Cone;Cleopatra H. Caldwell

  • The relationship between racial identity and self-esteem in African American college and high school students.

    Stephanie J. Rowley;Robert M. Sellers;Tabbye M. Chavous;Mia A. Smith

  • Gender matters, too: The influences of school racial discrimination and racial identity on academic engagement outcomes among African American adolescents.

    Tabbye M. Chavous;Deborah Rivas-Drake;Ciara Smalls;Tiffany Griffin

  • Racial Ideology and Racial Centrality as Predictors of African American College Students' Academic Performance

    Robert M. Sellers;Tabbye M. Chavous;Deanna Y. Cooke

  • Racial Discrimination and Racial Identity as Risk or Protective Factors for Violent Behaviors in African American Young Adults

    Cleopatra Howard Caldwell;Laura P. Kohn-Wood;Karen H. Schmeelk-Cone;Tabbye M. Chavous

  • Racial ideological beliefs and racial discrimination experiences as predictors of academic engagement among African American adolescents

    Ciara Smalls;Rhonda White;Tabbye Chavous;Robert Sellers

  • The Relationships among Racial Identity, Perceived Ethnic Fit, and Organizational Involvement for African American Students at a Predominantly White University

    Tabbye M. Chavous

  • An intergroup contact-theory framework for evaluating racial climate on predominantly white college campuses.

    Tabbye M. Chavous

  • Racial Stereotypes and Gender in Context: African Americans at Predominantly Black and Predominantly White Colleges

    Tabbye M. Chavous;Angel Harris;Deborah Rivas;Lumas Helaire

  • Racial Identity, School Racial Climate, and School Intrinsic Motivation Among African American Youth: The Importance of Person–Context Congruence

    Christy M. Byrd;Tabbye Chavous

  • Racial Identity and Academic Achievement in the Neighborhood Context: A Multilevel Analysis

    Christy M. Byrd;Tabbye M. Chavous

  • School-Based Racial and Gender Discrimination among African American Adolescents: Exploring Gender Variation in Frequency and Implications for Adjustment

    Courtney D. Cogburn;Tabbye M. Chavous;Tiffany M. Griffin

  • Say it loud-i'm black and I'm Proud: Parents' messages about race, racial discrimination, and academic achievement in african american boys

    Enrique W. Neblett;Tabbye M. Chavous;Hoa X. Nguyên;Robert M. Sellers

  • Connecting Self-Esteem and Achievement: Diversity in Academic Identification and Dis-identification Patterns Among Black College Students

    Elan C. Hope;Tabbye M. Chavous;Robert J. Jagers;Robert M. Sellers

  • Role of Student Background, Perceptions of Ethnic Fit, and Racial Identification in the Academic Adjustment of African American Students at a Predominantly White University

    Tabbye Chavous;Deborah Rivas;Laurette Green;Lumas Helaire

  • Racial pride and religiosity among African American boys: implications for academic motivation and achievement.

    Sheretta T. Butler-Barnes;Terrinieka T. Williams;Tabbye M. Chavous

  • African American Adolescents’ Academic Persistence: A Strengths-Based Approach

    Sheretta T. Butler-Barnes;Tabbye M. Chavous;Noelle Hurd;Fatima Varner

  • Racial Identity, Racial Discrimination, and Classroom Engagement Outcomes Among Black Girls and Boys in Predominantly Black and Predominantly White School Districts:

    Seanna Leath;Channing Mathews;Asya Harrison;Tabbye Chavous

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert M. Sellers
Robert M. Sellers University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stephanie J. Rowley
Stephanie J. Rowley University of Virginia
Marc A. Zimmerman
Marc A. Zimmerman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Cleopatra H. Caldwell
Cleopatra H. Caldwell University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
J. Nicole Shelton
J. Nicole Shelton Princeton University
Abigail J. Stewart
Abigail J. Stewart University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Deborah Rivas-Drake
Deborah Rivas-Drake University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Julie C. Lumeng
Julie C. Lumeng University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James S. Jackson
James S. Jackson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Enrique W. Neblett
Enrique W. Neblett University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology opens up a range of career opportunities in fields such as counseling, mental health, and social services. Prospective students are often concerned about program affordability and reputation, which are key factors when selecting a degree pathway.

For those seeking cost-effective options, some of the cheapest online counseling degrees in Texas offer quality education at lower tuition rates. On a nationwide scale, there are many affordable online counseling programs in the US that prioritize accessibility without compromising academic standards.

If you are interested in joining highly regarded programs, consider reviewing the top-ranked counseling degree programs in Arizona, which are known for strong curricula and student outcomes. California is also home to many popular counseling programs in California, offering diverse specializations and flexible study options.

Online psychology and counseling programs are designed for convenience and flexibility, making them ideal for working professionals or those with personal commitments. By exploring these pathways, students can find affordable, reputable programs that support their career goals in mental health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Tabbye M. Chavous

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles