World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John C. Foster

John C. Foster

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
73
Citations
14483
World Ranking
829
National Ranking
392

John C. Foster publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Foster sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 249 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

John C. Foster D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Foster sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

John C. Foster is affiliated with MIT in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the fields of Physics and Astronomy as well as Earth and Planetary Sciences. The subfields they contribute to include Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Oceanography, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics of Foster's scholarly work cover a range of areas focused on space and Earth sciences. These include:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • GNSS positioning and interference
  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies

Foster has published extensively in various scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Geophysical monograph
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Space Science Reviews

Representative recent papers authored or coauthored by Foster highlight their involvement in research exploring ionospheric and space plasma phenomena. These publications include:

  • The Relativistic Electron-Proton Telescope (REPT) Investigation: Design, Operational Properties, and Science Highlights (2021, Space Science Reviews)
  • Imaging the May 2024 Extreme Aurora With Ionospheric Total Electron Content (2024, Geophysical Research Letters)
  • The Van Allen Probes Electric Field and Waves Instrument: Science Results, Measurements, and Access to Data (2022, Space Science Reviews)
  • Ionospheric Storm-Enhanced Density Plumes (2021, Geophysical monograph)
  • A Statistical Study of the Subauroral Polarization Stream Over North American Sector Using the Millstone Hill Incoherent Scatter Radar 1979-2019 Measurements (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics)

Foster's collaborative network includes frequent coauthors such as P. J. Erickson, Y. Nishimura, Shasha Zou, Shun-Rong Zhang, and A. J. Coster, reflecting ongoing partnerships in related research areas.

Best Publications

  • The Electric Field and Waves Instruments on the Radiation Belt Storm Probes Mission

    J. R. Wygant;J. W. Bonnell;K. Goetz;R. E. Ergun

  • Global dayside ionospheric uplift and enhancement associated with interplanetary electric fields

    Bruce Tsurutani;Anthony Mannucci;Byron Iijima;Mangalathayil Ali Abdu

  • Magnetospheric substorms-definition and signatures

    G. Rostoker;S.-I. Akasofu;J. Foster;R.A. Greenwald

  • SAPS: A new categorization for sub‐auroral electric fields

    J. C. Foster;W. J. Burke

  • Average characteristics and activity dependence of the subauroral polarization stream

    John C Foster;H. B. Vo

  • Storm time plasma transport at middle and high latitudes

    John C. Foster

  • Long‐duration penetration of the interplanetary electric field to the low‐latitude ionosphere during the main phase of magnetic storms

    Chao-Song Huang;John C. Foster;Michael C. Kelley

  • Ionospheric signatures of plasmaspheric tails

    J. C. Foster;P. J. Erickson;A. J. Coster;J. Goldstein

  • Ionospheric convection associated with discrete levels of particle precipitation

    J. C. Foster;J. M. Holt;R. G. Musgrove;D. S. Evans

  • Multiradar observations of the polar tongue of ionization

    J. C. Foster;A. J. Coster;P. J. Erickson;J. M. Holt

  • Storm-time electric-field penetration observed at mid-latitude

    H.-C. Yeh;J. C. Foster;F. J. Rich;W. Swider

  • An impenetrable barrier to ultrarelativistic electrons in the Van Allen radiation belts

    D. N. Baker;A. N. Jaynes;V. C. Hoxie;R. M. Thorne

  • Latitudinal variation of perturbation electric fields during magnetically disturbed periods - 1986 Sundial observations and model results

    Bela G. Fejer;R. W. Spiro;R. A. Wolf;J. C. Foster

  • Space Weather Effects in the Earth’s Radiation Belts

    D. N. Baker;P. J. Erickson;J. F. Fennell;J. C. Foster

  • On the importance of E‐field variability for Joule heating in the high‐latitude thermosphere

    M. V. Codrescu;T. J. Fuller-Rowell;J. C. Foster

  • Plasmaspheric Density Structures and Dynamics: Properties Observed by the CLUSTER and IMAGE Missions

    Fabien Darrouzet;Dennis L. Gallagher;Nicolas André;Donald L. Carpenter

  • Midlatitude TEC enhancements during the October 2003 superstorm

    John C Foster;William C Rideout

  • Relationship of interplanetary parameters and occurrence of magnetospheric substorms

    J. C. Foster;D. H. Fairfield;K. W. Ogilvie;T. J. Rosenberg

  • Joule heating at high latitudes

    J. C. Foster;J.-P. St.-Maurice;V. J. Abreu

  • Prompt midlatitude electric field effects during severe geomagnetic storms

    J. C. Foster;F. J. Rich

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Holt
John M. Holt University of Leicester
Daniel N. Baker
Daniel N. Baker University of Colorado Boulder
O. de la Beaujardiere
O. de la Beaujardiere SRI International
Geoffrey D. Reeves
Geoffrey D. Reeves Los Alamos National Laboratory
David S. Evans
David S. Evans National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Mike Lockwood
Mike Lockwood University of Reading

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge beyond Earth Science, there are many pathways to consider. Seniors, in particular, may find value in pursuing one year degree programs for seniors that offer flexible and accelerated learning options suited to their pace. These programs can complement an Earth Science background with practical skills or new interests.

Careers in Earth Science often intersect with information management and research, making degrees related to library and information science highly relevant. Exploring ala accredited schools ensures the quality and recognition of such programs, which can open doors to specialized roles like data curation or archival work connected to environmental studies.

One common question is is library science a good degree for someone with a science background? The answer leans positive, especially if you aim to work in research libraries or manage scientific databases where your Earth Science expertise adds value.

Additionally, visual communication is key in Earth Science related fields, making a creative skillset useful. Online options such as the online photography degree programs are affordable ways to develop skills in digital imaging, useful for everything from field documentation to public outreach.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Foster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles