World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
40
Citations
4802
World Ranking
5946
National Ranking
634

John M. Holt publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Holt sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 110 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

John M. Holt D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Holt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ionosphere
  • Astronomy
  • Meteorology

John M. Holt mostly deals with Incoherent scatter, Ionosphere, Millstone Hill, Atmospheric sciences and Geophysics. His Incoherent scatter research integrates issues from Meteorology, Convection, Latitude and F region. The Ionosphere study combines topics in areas such as Interplanetary magnetic field and Ionosonde.

John M. Holt usually deals with Millstone Hill and limits it to topics linked to Geodesy and Remote sensing. His study in Atmospheric sciences focuses on Middle latitudes in particular. Many of his research projects under Geophysics are closely connected to Electric potential with Electric potential, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.

His most cited work include:

  • Ionospheric convection associated with discrete levels of particle precipitation (263 citations)
  • Comparison of COSMIC ionospheric measurements with ground-based observations and model predictions : Preliminary results (238 citations)
  • Multiradar observations of the polar tongue of ionization (224 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

John M. Holt spends much of his time researching Ionosphere, Millstone Hill, Incoherent scatter, Atmospheric sciences and Geophysics. His studies deal with areas such as Meteorology and Latitude as well as Ionosphere. His Millstone Hill study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Earth's magnetic field, Convection and Noon.

John M. Holt studied Incoherent scatter and Remote sensing that intersect with Universal Time. His Atmospheric sciences research includes elements of Climatology and Altitude. His Geophysics research focuses on subjects like Geomagnetic storm, which are linked to Total electron content.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Ionosphere (72.07%)
  • Millstone Hill (67.57%)
  • Incoherent scatter (61.26%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2008-2018)?

  • Ionosphere (72.07%)
  • Atmospheric sciences (47.75%)
  • Millstone Hill (67.57%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

John M. Holt mainly investigates Ionosphere, Atmospheric sciences, Millstone Hill, Environmental science and Incoherent scatter. Ionosphere is a subfield of Geophysics that John M. Holt explores. In his research, Solar minimum, Storm, Daytime, Amplitude and Morning is intimately related to Thermosphere, which falls under the overarching field of Atmospheric sciences.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Climatology and Earth's magnetic field in addition to Millstone Hill. His Incoherent scatter study deals with Latitude intersecting with Polar and Dipole model of the Earth's magnetic field. John M. Holt interconnects Electron temperature and Atmospheric temperature in the investigation of issues within Noon.

Between 2008 and 2018, his most popular works were:

  • Magnetic declination and zonal wind effects on longitudinal differences of ionospheric electron density at midlatitudes (54 citations)
  • Millstone Hill ISR observations of upper atmospheric long-term changes: Height dependency (44 citations)
  • Thermospheric poleward wind surge at midlatitudes during great storm intervals (42 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Astronomy
  • Ionosphere
  • Meteorology

His scientific interests lie mostly in Environmental science, Ionosphere, Atmospheric sciences, Millstone Hill and Incoherent scatter. His Earth's magnetic field research extends to Ionosphere, which is thematically connected. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Solar cycle, Daytime, Longitude and Electron density.

John M. Holt has researched Incoherent scatter in several fields, including Atmosphere and Climatology. His study in Noon is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Electron temperature, Atmospheric temperature, Solar minimum and Thermosphere. His F region research incorporates themes from Dipole model of the Earth's magnetic field, Latitude and Altitude.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of COSMIC ionospheric measurements with ground-based observations and model predictions : Preliminary results

    Jiuhou Lei;Stig Syndergaard;Alan G. Burns;Stanley C. Solomon

  • Ionospheric convection associated with discrete levels of particle precipitation

    J. C. Foster;J. M. Holt;R. G. Musgrove;D. S. Evans

  • Multiradar observations of the polar tongue of ionization

    J. C. Foster;A. J. Coster;P. J. Erickson;J. M. Holt

  • On the latitudinal variations of the ionospheric electric field during magnetospheric disturbances

    C. A. Gonzales;M. C. Kelley;R. A. Behnke;J. F. Vickrey

  • Observations of the May 30, 1984, annular solar eclipse at Millstone Hill

    J. E. Salah;W. L. Oliver;J. C. Foster;J. M. Holt

  • Electric field variability associated with the Millstone Hill electric field model

    M. V. Codrescu;T. J. Fuller-Rowell;J. C. Foster;J. M. Holt

  • Millstone hill incoherent scatter observations of auroral convection over 60° ≤Λ ≤75° 2. Initial results

    J.V. Evans;J.M. Holt;W.L. Oliver;R.H. Wand

  • Global measures of ionospheric electrodynamic activity inferred from combined incoherent scatter radar and ground magnetometer observations

    A. D. Richmond;Y. Kamide;S.-I. Akasofu;D. Alcaydé

  • Mapping electrodynamic features of the high-latitude ionosphere from localized observations: Combined incoherent-scatter radar and magnetometer measurements for January 18-19, 1984

    A. D. Richmond;Y. Kamide;B. H. Ahn;S. I. Akasofu

  • Optimal analysis of incoherent scatter radar data

    J. M. Holt;D. A. Rhoda;D. Tetenbaum;A. P. van Eyken

  • Empirical models for the plasma convection at high latitudes from Millstone Hill observations

    J. M. Holt;R. H. Wand;J. V. Evans;W. L. Oliver

  • Magnetic declination and zonal wind effects on longitudinal differences of ionospheric electron density at midlatitudes

    Shun-Rong Zhang;John C. Foster;John M. Holt;Philip J. Erickson

  • A differential-Doppler study of traveling ionospheric disturbances from Millstone Hill

    J. V. Evans;J. M. Holt;R. H. Wand

  • On the relative importance of convection and temperature to the behavior of the ionosphere in North America during January 6–12, 1997

    P. G. Richards;M. J. Buonsanto;B. W. Reinisch;J. Holt

  • Ionospheric local model and climatology from long-term databases of multiple incoherent scatter radars

    Shun-Rong Zhang;John M. Holt;Anthony P. van Eyken;Mary McCready

  • Thermospheric poleward wind surge at midlatitudes during great storm intervals

    Shun Rong Zhang;Philip J. Erickson;John C. Foster;John M. Holt

  • Midlatitude ionospheric plasma temperature climatology and empirical model based on Saint Santin incoherent scatter radar data from 1966 to 1987

    Shun-Rong Zhang;John M. Holt;Angela M. Zalucha;Christine Amory-Mazaudier

  • Millstone Hill ISR observations of upper atmospheric long-term changes: Height dependency

    Shun-Rong Zhang;John M. Holt;James Kurdzo

  • Radar and optical measurements of ionospheric processes associated with intense subauroral electric fields

    James F. Providakes;Michael C. Kelley;Wesley E. Swartz;Michael Mendillo

  • Russian-American tomography experiment

    J. C. Foster;M. J. Buonsanto;J. M. Holt;J. A. Klobuchar

  • Observations of ion-neutral coupling associated with strong electrodynamic disturbances during the 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm†

    Shun‐Rong Zhang;Philip J Erickson;Yongliang Zhang;Wenbin Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

O. de la Beaujardiere
O. de la Beaujardiere SRI International
David S. Evans
David S. Evans National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Shoichiro Fukao
Shoichiro Fukao Kyoto University
Robert W. Schunk
Robert W. Schunk Utah State University
Michael P. Sulzer
Michael P. Sulzer Arecibo Observatory
Jan Josef Sojka
Jan Josef Sojka Utah State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary online degree options. For those interested in visual documentation and environmental analysis, a digital photography degree online can complement field studies by enhancing skills in capturing and interpreting geological and ecological changes.

Veterans looking to transition into this exciting field will find tailored resources such as the photography degree online for veterans, which offers flexible learning environments and veteran-friendly benefits, facilitating career growth in Earth Science and environmental documentation.

Linguistic skills also play a crucial role in Earth Science careers, especially for professionals involved in international research and community engagement. Pursuing a spanish online degree can lead to better communication and expanded career opportunities in diverse geographical areas.

For military personnel and veterans, specialized programs like military friendly online spanish degree programs provide an accessible way to acquire language skills that support careers in Earth Science sectors requiring bilingual capabilities.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Holt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles