World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 16279 15310 227 224 753 21111

Bart Bijnens publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bart Bijnens between 1985 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bart Bijnens published across 42 years, from 1985 to 2026, averaging 19.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 59 publications in 2004. 11 of the 817 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 59. Peak 59 publications in 2004. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 30 publications 2001: 41 publications 2002: 47 publications 2003: 27 publications 2004: 59 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 27 publications 2007: 43 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 42 publications 2013: 36 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 2 publications
1985 2026

817 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bart Bijnens: publications per year, 1985 to 2026
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 3
1994 6
1995 7
1996 6
1997 18
1998 15
1999 17
2000 30
2001 41
2002 47
2003 27
2004 59
2005 25
2006 27
2007 43
2008 22
2009 31
2010 21
2011 23
2012 42
2013 36
2014 38
2015 26
2016 23
2017 30
2018 18
2019 12
2020 29
2021 29
2022 20
2023 22
2024 11
2025 9
2026 2
Total 817
Download as CSV

Bart Bijnens publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart Bijnens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 741–760 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 753 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230 753
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Bart Bijnens D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart Bijnens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bart Bijnens is affiliated with the University of Barcelona in Spain and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, with a primary focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology, and Surgery.

Their research topics cover a diverse array of cardiovascular and developmental health issues. Key areas include:

  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise

Bijnens has published frequently in a number of scientific venues, notably:

  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • European Heart Journal
  • Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Scientific Reports

The scientist has co-authored publications with numerous researchers, including:

  • Marta Sitges
  • F. Crispi
  • Filip Lončarić
  • Patricia García-Canadilla
  • E. Gratacós

Selected recent papers illustrate the scope and focus of Bijnens's research activities:

  • "Machine Learning in Fetal Cardiology: What to Expect," 2020, published in Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
  • "Prevalence and pattern of cardiovascular magnetic resonance late gadolinium enhancement in highly trained endurance athletes," 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • "Machine Learning for Clinical Decision-Making: Challenges and Opportunities in Cardiovascular Imaging," 2022, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
  • "Main Patterns of Fetal Cardiac Remodeling," 2020, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
  • "Distribution of myocardial work in arterial hypertension: insights from non-invasive left ventricular pressure-strain relations," 2020, International Journal of Cardiac Imaging

Best Publications

  • Regional Strain and Strain Rate Measurements by Cardiac Ultrasound: Principles, Implementation and Limitations

    Jan D'hooge;A. Heimdal;F. Jamal;Tomasz Kukulski

  • Strain and strain rate imaging: a new clinical approach to quantifying regional myocardial function.

    George R Sutherland;Giovanni Di Salvo;Piet Claus;Jan D'hooge

  • Experimental Validation of a New Ultrasound Method for the Simultaneous Assessment of Radial and Longitudinal Myocardial Deformation Independent of Insonation Angle

    Stian Langeland;Jan D’hooge;Patrick F. Wouters;H. Alex Leather

  • Myocardial function defined by strain rate and strain during alterations in inotropic states and heart rate

    Frank Weidemann;Fadi Jamal;George R. Sutherland;Piet Claus

  • Fetal Growth Restriction Results in Remodeled and Less Efficient Hearts in Children

    Fàtima Crispi;Bart Bijnens;Francesc Figueras;Joaquim Bartrons

  • Can natural strain and strain rate quantify regional myocardial deformation? A study in healthy subjects

    Mirosław Kowalski;Tomasz Kukulski;Fadi Jamal;Jan D’hooge

  • Long-Term Outcome of Aortic Dissection With Patent False Lumen Predictive Role of Entry Tear Size and Location

    Artur Evangelista;Armando Salas;Aida Ribera;Ignacio Ferreira-González

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy can reverse abnormal myocardial strain distribution in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.

    Ole A Breithardt;Christoph Stellbrink;Lieven Herbots;Piet Claus

  • Quantification of regional left and right ventricular radial and longitudinal function in healthy children using ultrasound-based strain rate and strain imaging.

    Frank Weidemann;Benedicte Eyskens;Fadi Jamal;Luc Mertens

  • Identification of acutely ischemic myocardium using ultrasonic strain measurements: A clinical study in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty

    Tomasz Kukulski;Fadi Jamal;Lieven Herbots;Jan D’hooge

  • Regional longitudinal strain distribution in the left and right ventricle in children after correction of tetralogy of fallot using ultrasound based strain rate imaging

    Frank Weidemann;B Eyskens;L Simmons;Miroslaw Kowalski

  • Feasibility of strain and strain rate imaging for the assessment of regional left atrial deformation: A study in normal subjects

    C Sirbu;L Herbots;Jan D'hooge;Piet Claus

  • Toward understanding response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: left ventricular dyssynchrony is only one of multiple mechanisms

    Chirine Parsai;Bart Bijnens;Bart Bijnens;Bart Bijnens;George Ross Sutherland;Aigul Baltabaeva

  • Noninvasive Quantification of the Contractile Reserve of Stunned Myocardium by Ultrasonic Strain Rate and Strain

    Fadi Jamal;Jörg Strotmann;Frank Weidemann;Tomasz Kukulski

  • Two-dimensional ultrasonic strain rate measurement of the human heart in vivo

    J. D'hooge;E. Konofagou;F. Jamal;A. Heimdal

  • Velocity and deformation imaging for the assessment of myocardial dysfunction

    Bart H. Bijnens;Maja Cikes;Piet Claus;George R. Sutherland

  • Myocardial dysfunction late after low-dose anthracycline treatment in asymptomatic pediatric patients.

    Javier Ganame;Piet Claus;Anne Uyttebroeck;Marleen Renard

  • Acute changes in systolic and diastolic events during clinical coronary angioplasty: a comparison of regional velocity, strain rate, and strain measurement

    Tomasz Kukulski;Fadi Jamal;Jan D'Hooge;Bart Bijnens

  • Defining the Transmurality of a Chronic Myocardial Infarction by Ultrasonic Strain-Rate Imaging Implications for Identifying Intramural Viability: An Experimental Study

    Frank Weidemann;Christoph Dommke;Bart Bijnens;Piet Claus

  • REVIEW ARTICLE Regional Strain and Strain Rate Measurements by Cardiac Ultrasound: Principles, Implementation and Limitations

    A. Heimdal;F. Jamal;T. Kukulski;B. Bijnens

Frequent Co-Authors

George R. Sutherland
George R. Sutherland St George's, University of London
Paul Suetens
Paul Suetens KU Leuven
Jan D'hooge
Jan D'hooge KU Leuven
Eduard Gratacós
Eduard Gratacós University of Barcelona
Luc Mertens
Luc Mertens University of Toronto
Alejandro F. Frangi
Alejandro F. Frangi University of Manchester
Lluis Mont
Lluis Mont University of Barcelona
Marc Gewillig
Marc Gewillig KU Leuven
Jan Thoen
Jan Thoen KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Medicine doesn’t always mean attending traditional, on-campus classes. Today’s healthcare landscape offers many flexible options for prospective students. Online degrees allow you to start or advance your medical career from anywhere, often with lower costs and greater flexibility.

For those interested in nursing careers, there are numerous affordable choices. Completing one of the cheapest online bsn programs is a popular pathway for aspiring registered nurses. If you are already an RN, you can further enhance your qualifications by pursuing one of the cheapest online rn to bsn programs.

Advanced practice roles, such as Nurse Practitioner, are more accessible thanks to the cheapest fnp programs online. For those seeking the highest level of nursing education and leadership opportunities, consider the cheapest dnp programs online.

These online degree options support a variety of career goals in healthcare, providing a flexible way to gain accredited qualifications while managing work or family commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Bart Bijnens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles