World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kenneth Holmqvist

Kenneth Holmqvist

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 44 5688 5487 187 179 199 12911

Kenneth Holmqvist publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kenneth Holmqvist between 1991 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kenneth Holmqvist published across 33 years, from 1991 to 2023, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2011. 3 of the 229 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2011. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication
1991 2023

229 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kenneth Holmqvist: publications per year, 1991 to 2023
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 2
1997 1
1998 3
1999 8
2000 0
2001 3
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 9
2006 9
2007 6
2008 11
2009 12
2010 18
2011 21
2012 19
2013 18
2014 8
2015 11
2016 9
2017 14
2018 9
2019 9
2020 8
2021 5
2022 2
2023 1
Total 229
Download as CSV

Kenneth Holmqvist publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth Holmqvist sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 199 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403 199
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Kenneth Holmqvist D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth Holmqvist sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310 44
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Kenneth Holmqvist is affiliated with the University of Regensburg in Germany. Their primary field of study is Computer Science, with a focus on subfields such as Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Ophthalmology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their research extensively covers topics including Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology, Glaucoma and retinal disorders, Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes, Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Visual perception and processing mechanisms, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, and Human-Animal Interaction Studies.

Holmqvist's frequent coauthors include Diederick C. Niehorster, Soon Young Park, Raimondas Zemblys, Saga Lee Örbom, and Pieter Blignaut.

Common venues for publication include:

  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Journal of Eye Movement Research
  • ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Frontiers in Education

Recent publications by Kenneth Holmqvist feature the following works:

  • RETRACTED ARTICLE: Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline, 2022, Behavior Research Methods
  • Small eye movements cannot be reliably measured by video-based P-CR eye-trackers, 2020, Behavior Research Methods

Best Publications

  • Eye Tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures

    Kenneth B. I. Holmqvist

  • An adaptive algorithm for fixation, saccade, and glissade detection in eyetracking data

    Marcus Nyström;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • Eye tracker data quality: what it is and how to measure it

    Kenneth Holmqvist;Marcus Nyström;Fiona Mulvey

  • Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance

    Jana Holsanova;Nils Holmberg;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • The influence of calibration method and eye physiology on eyetracking data quality

    Marcus Nyström;Richard Andersson;Kenneth Holmqvist;Joost van de Weijer

  • Entry points and reading paths on the newspaper spread: Comparing semiotic analysis with eye-tracking measurements.

    Jana Holsanova;Henrik Rahm;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • Pictures and Spoken Descriptions Elicit Similar Eye Movements During Mental Imagery, Both in Light and in Complete Darkness

    Roger Johansson;Jana Holsanova;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • Threats to the validity of eye-movement research in psychology.

    Jacob L. Orquin;Kenneth Holmqvist;Kenneth Holmqvist;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • One algorithm to rule them all? An evaluation and discussion of ten eye movement event-detection algorithms

    Richard Andersson;Richard Andersson;Linnea Larsson;Kenneth Holmqvist;Martin Stridh

  • Using eye-tracking to trace a cognitive process: Gaze behavior during decision making in a natural environment

    Kerstin Gidlöf;Annika Wallin;Richard Dewhurst;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • Reading or scanning? A study of newspaper and net paper reading.

    Kenneth Holmqvist;Jana Holsanova;Maria Barthelson;Daniel Lundqvist

  • A vector-based, multidimensional scanpath similarity measure

    Halszka Jarodzka;Kenneth Holmqvist;Marcus Nyström

  • Using machine learning to detect events in eye-tracking data

    Raimondas Zemblys;Raimondas Zemblys;Diederick C Niehorster;Diederick C Niehorster;Oleg V. Komogortsev;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • What speakers do and what addressees look at: visual attention to gestures in human interaction live and on video

    Marianne Gullberg;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding

    Alexander Eitel;Katharina Scheiter;Anne Schüler;Marcus Nyström

  • Conveying clinical reasoning based on visual observation via eye-movement modelling examples

    Halszka Jarodzka;Thomas Balslev;Kenneth Holmqvist;Marcus Nyström

  • It depends on how you look at it: Scanpath comparison in multiple dimensions with MultiMatch, a vector-based approach

    Richard Dewhurst;Marcus Nyström;Halszka Jarodzka;Tom Foulsham

  • Sampling frequency and eye-tracking measures: how speed affects durations, latencies, and more

    Richard Andersson;Marcus Nyström;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • Eye tracking in Educational Science: Theoretical frameworks and research agendas.

    Halszka Jarodzka;Kenneth Holmqvist;Hans Gruber

  • Combined eyetracking and keystroke-logging methods for studying cognitive processes in text production

    Åsa Wengelin;Mark Torrance;Kenneth Holmqvist;Sol Simpson

  • Keeping an eye on gestures: Visual perception of gestures in face-to-face communication

    Marianne Gullberg;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • Eye movements during scene recollection have a functional role, but they are not reinstatements of those produced during encoding.

    Roger Johansson;Jana Holsanova;Richard Dewhurst;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • Semantic override of low-level features in image viewing - both initially and overall

    Marcus Nyström;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • What keystroke-logging can reveal about writing

    Sven Strömqvist;Kenneth Holmqvist;Victoria Johansson;Henrik Karlsson

  • Fit-for-duty test for estimation of drivers' sleepiness level : Eye movements improve the sleep/wake predictor

    Christer Ahlström;Marcus Nyström;Kenneth Holmqvist;Carina Fors

  • Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: Evidence from eye-fixation related potentials

    Jaana Simola;Kenneth Holmqvist;Magnus Lindgren

  • Hearing loss and a supportive tactile signal in a navigation system: Effects on driving behavior and eye movements

    Birgitta Thorslund;Björn Peters;Nicholas Herbert;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • Comparing scanpaths during scene encoding and recognition : A multi-dimensional approach

    Thomas Foulsham;Richard Dewhurst;Marcus Nyström;Halszka Jarodzka

  • gazeNet: End-to-end eye-movement event detection with deep neural networks

    Raimondas Zemblys;Diederick C Niehorster;Kenneth Holmqvist;Kenneth Holmqvist;Kenneth Holmqvist

  • End-to-end eye-movement event detection using deep neural networks

    Raimondas Zemblys;Diederick C Niehorster;Kenneth Holmqvist

Frequent Co-Authors

Katharina Scheiter
Katharina Scheiter University of Potsdam
Ignace T. C. Hooge
Ignace T. C. Hooge Utrecht University
Marianne Gullberg
Marianne Gullberg Lund University
Peter Gerjets
Peter Gerjets University of Tübingen
Marc Alexa
Marc Alexa Technical University of Berlin
Tom Foulsham
Tom Foulsham University of Essex
Magnus Lindgren
Magnus Lindgren Lund University
Andrew T. Duchowski
Andrew T. Duchowski Clemson University
Björn Lyxell
Björn Lyxell Linköping University
Mikael Johansson
Mikael Johansson Royal Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth Holmqvist

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles