World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
9993
World Ranking
5707
National Ranking
478

Stefan Isenmann publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Isenmann sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 171 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stefan Isenmann D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Isenmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefan Isenmann is affiliated with Friedrich Schiller University Jena in Germany. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Neurology. The subfields of study for their work include Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Dermatology, Infectious Diseases, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The topics covered in Isenmann's research reflect a diverse interest in both neurological and cardiovascular conditions, as well as dermatological and infectious disease aspects. Key topics include:

  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
  • Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects

Their most cited publications include research on neurological and infectious disease topics. Selected papers authored or co-authored by Isenmann include:

  • "Neurological manifestations of COVID-19" - guideline of the German society of neurology, 2020, published in Neurological Research and Practice
  • S1 guidelines "lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid analysis" (abridged and translated version), 2020, Neurological Research and Practice
  • MOG antibody-associated encephalitis secondary to Covid-19: case report, 2021, BMC Neurology
  • Reliable Detection of Atrial Fibrillation with a Medical Wearable during Inpatient Conditions, 2020, Sensors
  • Oligoclonal bands and kappa free light chains: Competing parameters or complementary biomarkers?, 2025, Autoimmunity Reviews

The frequent co-authors with whom Isenmann has collaborated include:

  • Hayrettin Tumani
  • A. Gerritzen
  • Catharina C. Groß
  • Michael Khalil
  • Piotr Lewczuk

The primary publication venues where Isenmann's work appears are:

  • Neurological Research and Practice
  • BMC Neurology
  • Autoimmunity Reviews
  • Sensors
  • Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie

Best Publications

  • Essential role for the c-met receptor in the migration of myogenic precursor cells into the limb bud.

    Friedhelm Bladt;Dieter Riethmacher;Stefan Isenmann;Adriano Aguzzi

  • Normal host prion protein necessary for scrapie-induced neurotoxicity

    Sebastian Brandner;Stefan Isenmann;Alex Raeber;Marek Fischer

  • Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 increases microglial infiltration and aggressiveness of gliomas

    Michael Platten;Alexandra Kretz;Ulrike Naumann;Steffen Aulwurm

  • Soluble decoy receptor 3 is expressed by malignant gliomas and suppresses CD95 ligand-induced apoptosis and chemotaxis.

    Wilfried Roth;Stefan Isenmann;Mitsutoshi Nakamura;Michael Platten

  • Protection by Synergistic Effects of Adenovirus-Mediated X-Chromosome-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis and Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene Transfer in the 1-Methyl-4-Phenyl-1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridine Model of Parkinson's Disease

    Olaf Eberhardt;Rainer V. Coelln;Sebastian Kügler;Jörg Lindenau

  • Neuron-specific expression of therapeutic proteins: evaluation of different cellular promoters in recombinant adenoviral vectors.

    S. Kügler;L. Meyn;H. Holzmüller;E. Gerhardt

  • Locoregional Apo2L/TRAIL eradicates intracranial human malignant glioma xenografts in athymic mice in the absence of neurotoxicity.

    Wilfried Roth;Stefan Isenmann;Ulrike Naumann;Sebastian Kügler

  • Erythropoietin promotes regeneration of adult CNS neurons via Jak2/Stat3 and PI3K/AKT pathway activation

    Alexandra Kretz;Caroline J. Happold;Julia K. Marticke;Stefan Isenmann;Stefan Isenmann

  • Molecular determinants of retinal ganglion cell development, survival, and regeneration

    Stefan Isenmann;Alexandra Kretz;Alessandro Cellerino

  • In vivo neurotrophic effects of GDNF on axotomized retinal ganglion cells.

    Nikolaj Klöcker;Frank Bräunling;Stefan Isenmann;Mathias Bähr

  • Up-regulation of Bax protein in degenerating retinal ganglion cells precedes apoptotic cell death after optic nerve lesion in the rat.

    Stefan Isenmann;Claudia Wahl;Stanislaw Krajewski;John C. Reed

  • Differential regulation of Bax, Bcl-2, and Bcl-X proteins in focal cortical ischemia in the rat

    Stefan Isenmann;Guido Stoll;Michael Schroeter;Stanislaw Krajewski

  • Limbic encephalitis due to GABAB and AMPA receptor antibodies: a case series

    M Dogan Onugoren;D Deuretzbacher;C A Haensch;H J Hagedorn

  • Adenovirus-mediated expression of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) rescues axotomized rat retinal ganglion cells but does not support axonal regeneration in vivo.

    Jens Weise;Stefan Isenmann;Nikolaj Klöcker;Sebastian Kügler

  • Anti-contactin-associated protein-2 encephalitis: relevance of antibody titres, presentation and outcome.

    C. G. Bien;Z. Mirzadjanova;C. Baumgartner;M. D. Onugoren;M. D. Onugoren

  • Cardiac denervation occurs independent of orthostatic hypotension and impaired heart rate variability in Parkinson's disease

    C.-A. Haensch;H. Lerch;J. Jörg;S. Isenmann

  • Apoptosis in the developing visual system.

    Alessandro Cellerino;Mathias Bähr;Stefan Isenmann

  • Adenovirus-mediated GDNF and CNTF pretreatment protects against striatal injury following transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice

    Dirk M. Hermann;Ertugrul Kilic;Sebastian Kügler;Stefan Isenmann

  • Bax antisense oligonucleotides reduce axotomy-induced retinal ganglion cell death in vivo by reduction of Bax protein expression.

    Stefan Isenmann;Stefan Engel;Frank Gillardon;Mathias Bähr

  • Protection of axotomized retinal ganglion cells by adenovirally delivered BDNF in vivo

    Unknown

  • The X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) prevents cell death in axotomized CNS neurons in vivo.

    S Kügler;G Straten;F Kreppel;S Isenmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Otto W. Witte
Otto W. Witte Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Mathias Bähr
Mathias Bähr University of Göttingen
Sebastian Kügler
Sebastian Kügler University of Göttingen
Adriano Aguzzi
Adriano Aguzzi University of Zurich
Sebastian Brandner
Sebastian Brandner University College London
Michael Weller
Michael Weller University of Zurich
Joachim Weis
Joachim Weis RWTH Aachen University
Ertugrul Kilic
Ertugrul Kilic Istanbul Medipol University
Jörg B. Schulz
Jörg B. Schulz RWTH Aachen University
Melitta Schachner
Melitta Schachner Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Neuroscience in the USA, consider a wide range of related online degrees and career pathways. Many students who start in neuroscience also show interest in overlapping fields such as psychology and social work. These disciplines often share foundational knowledge, and skills are transferable across professions.

For those interested in therapy and counseling, a mft degree (Marriage and Family Therapy) is a highly respected option that can be pursued online. Additionally, aspiring psychologists can find various cheapest online master's in psychology programs, making advanced education more accessible.

Entry-level academic routes are also available, with a variety of accredited cheap online psychology degree programs for undergraduates. Those considering social work may wonder about their timeline—learn how long does it take to get a msw online and explore flexible study options.

By taking advantage of these online pathways, you can broaden your skillset and career prospects within neuroscience and adjacent fields while maintaining flexibility in your studies.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Isenmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles