World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
6499
World Ranking
6345
National Ranking
2157

Rahel Sollmann publications per year

2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 4 publications
2009 2026

178 publications in total across all disciplines

Rahel Sollmann publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rahel Sollmann sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 157 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Rahel Sollmann D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rahel Sollmann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Hellman Fellow

Overview

Rahel Sollmann is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with a strong focus on Ecology. Key subfields include Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The main topics covered in Sollmann's work encompass Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Rangeland and Wildlife Management, Fire effects on ecosystems, Avian ecology and behavior, and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies.

Recent papers by Sollmann include:

  • Identifying conservation priorities in a defaunated tropical biodiversity hotspot (2020, Diversity and Distributions)
  • Resilience of terrestrial and aquatic fauna to historical and future wildfire regimes in western North America (2021, Ecology and Evolution)
  • Estimating abundance and growth rates in a wild mountain gorilla population (2020, Animal Conservation)
  • Conservation in the maelstrom of Covid-19 - a call to action to solve the challenges, exploit opportunities and prepare for the next pandemic (2020, Animal Conservation)
  • An integrated approach to measure hunting intensity and assess its impacts on mammal populations (2020, Journal of Applied Ecology)

Frequent co-authors working alongside Sollmann are:

  • Andreas Wilting
  • Jesse F. Abrams
  • Jürgen Niedballa
  • Angela M. White
  • Andrew Tilker

The most common publication venues for their research include:

  • Ecology and Evolution
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Animal Conservation
  • Biological Conservation
  • Ecological Applications

Rahel Sollmann received the Hellman Fellow award in 2020.

Best Publications

  • camtrapR: an R package for efficient camera trap data management

    Jürgen Niedballa;Rahel Sollmann;Alexandre Courtiol;Andreas Wilting

  • Risky business or simple solution – Relative abundance indices from camera-trapping

    Rahel Sollmann;Azlan Mohamed;Hiromitsu Samejima;Andreas Wilting

  • Improving density estimates for elusive carnivores: Accounting for sex-specific detection and movements using spatial capture–recapture models for jaguars in central Brazil

    Rahel Sollmann;Rahel Sollmann;Mariana Malzoni Furtado;Mariana Malzoni Furtado;Beth Gardner;Heribert Hofer

  • Jaguar and Puma Activity Patterns and Predator-Prey Interactions in Four Brazilian Biomes

    Vania C. Foster;Vania C. Foster;Pedro Sarmento;Rahel Sollmann;Rahel Sollmann;Natalia Tôrres;Natalia Tôrres

  • How Does Spatial Study Design Influence Density Estimates from Spatial Capture-Recapture Models?

    Rahel Sollmann;Beth Gardner;Jerrold L. Belant

  • A gentle introduction to camera‐trap data analysis

    Rahel Sollmann

  • Connecting Earth observation to high-throughput biodiversity data

    Alex Bush;Alex Bush;Alex Bush;Rahel Sollmann;Andreas Wilting;Kristine Bohmann;Kristine Bohmann

  • Fully Spatial Capture-Recapture Models

    J.Andrew Royle;Richard B. Chandler;Rahel Sollmann;Beth Gardner

  • A spatial mark–resight model augmented with telemetry data

    Rachel Sollmann;Beth Gardner;Arielle W. Parsons;Jessica J. Stocking

  • iDNA from terrestrial haematophagous leeches as a wildlife surveying and monitoring tool – prospects, pitfalls and avenues to be developed

    Ida Bærholm Schnell;Ida Bærholm Schnell;Rahel Sollmann;Rahel Sollmann;Rahel Sollmann;Sébastien Calvignac-Spencer;Mark E. Siddall

  • Comparing capture-recapture, mark-resight, and spatial mark-resight models for estimating puma densities via camera traps

    Lindsey N. Rich;Marcella J. Kelly;Rahel Sollmann;Andrew Noss

  • Using occupancy models to investigate space partitioning between two sympatric large predators, the jaguar and puma in central Brazil

    Rahel Sollmann;Rahel Sollmann;Mariana Malzoni Furtado;Mariana Malzoni Furtado;Heribert Hofer;Anah T.A. Jácomo

  • Coming down from the trees: Is terrestrial activity in Bornean orangutans natural or disturbance driven?

    Marc Ancrenaz;Rahel Sollmann;Erik Meijaard;Andrew J. Hearn

  • Cover of tall trees best predicts California spotted owl habitat

    Malcolm P. North;Malcolm P. North;Jonathan T. Kane;Van R. Kane;Gregory P. Asner

  • Use of Camera‐Trapping to Estimate Puma Density and Influencing Factors in Central Brazil

    Nuno Negrões;Pedro Sarmento;Joana Cruz;Catarina Eira

  • Density and habitat use of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in three commercial forest reserves in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo

    Azlan Mohamed;Rahel Sollmann;Henry Bernard;Laurentius N. Ambu

  • Using multiple data sources provides density estimates for endangered Florida panther

    Rahel Sollmann;Beth Gardner;Richard B. Chandler;David B. Shindle

  • Combining camera-trapping and noninvasive genetic data in a spatial capture–recapture framework improves density estimates for the jaguar

    Rahel Sollmann;Rahel Sollmann;Natália Mundim Tôrres;Natália Mundim Tôrres;Mariana Malzoni Furtado;Mariana Malzoni Furtado;Anah Tereza de Almeida Jácomo

  • Shifting up a gear with iDNA: From mammal detection events to standardised surveys

    Jesse F. Abrams;Lisa A. Hörig;Robert Brozovic;Jan Axtner

  • Ecology of the Giant Armadillo (Priodontes maximus) in the Grasslands of Central Brazil

    Leandro Silveira;Anah Tereza de Almeida Jácomo;Mariana Malzoni Furtado;Natália Mundim Torres

  • Habitat degradation and indiscriminate hunting differentially impact faunal communities in the Southeast Asian tropical biodiversity hotspot

    Andrew Tilker;Jesse F. Abrams;Azlan Mohamed;Azlan Mohamed;An Nguyen

  • Mentawai’s endemic, relictual fauna: is it evidence for Pleistocene extinctions on Sumatra?

    Andreas Wilting;Rahel Sollmann;Erik Meijaard;Kristofer M Helgen

Frequent Co-Authors

Beth Gardner
Beth Gardner University of Washington
Leandro Silveira
Leandro Silveira University of Brasília
Andreas Wilting
Andreas Wilting Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research
J. Andrew Royle
J. Andrew Royle United States Geological Survey
Douglas W. Yu
Douglas W. Yu University of East Anglia
Heribert Hofer
Heribert Hofer Leibniz Association
Jerrold L. Belant
Jerrold L. Belant SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
David W. Macdonald
David W. Macdonald University of Oxford
Francisco Palomares
Francisco Palomares Spanish National Research Council
M. Thomas P. Gilbert
M. Thomas P. Gilbert University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up diverse career pathways for those interested in Ecology and Evolution, or in broader life sciences. Fast-track programs such as the 6-month rn to bsn program combine schedule flexibility with academic rigor, making it easier for working professionals to upskill quickly. Similarly, specialized rn to np programs are designed for nurses aiming to advance into nurse practitioner roles—a great option for those wanting to translate biological science education into health-related careers.

For individuals from non-nursing backgrounds eager to pivot into healthcare, online direct entry msn degrees provide a fast route into the nursing profession. With many institutions offering competitive programs, choosing the right fit is important. For example, you can compare universities and delivery models—like capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn—to find a program that matches your learning style and career goals.

Whether you aim for research, conservation, or healthcare, flexible online degrees help bridge the gap between science education and professional advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Rahel Sollmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles