World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
8121
World Ranking
6910
National Ranking
2988

Flavio Fröhlich publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Flavio Fröhlich sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Flavio Fröhlich D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Flavio Fröhlich sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Flavio Fröhlich is a researcher affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of neuroscience, with a distinct focus on cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience. They also have contributions in statistical and nonlinear physics as well as psychiatry and mental health.

The research topics that Fröhlich has explored include:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research

Fröhlich's publication record includes numerous papers in renowned scientific venues. Their frequent publication outlets include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neurophysiology

Among their recent papers are several collaborative works, notably:

  • "Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains alpha oscillations by preferential phase synchronization of fast-spiking cortical neurons to stimulation waveform" (2021, Nature Communications)
  • "Causal role of cross-frequency coupling in distinct components of cognitive control" (2021, Progress in Neurobiology)
  • "Pinging the brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals cortical reactivity in time and space" (2021, Brain Stimulation)
  • "Targeting neural oscillations with transcranial alternating current stimulation" (2021, Brain Research)
  • "Conducting double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)" (2021, Translational Psychiatry)

Frequently collaborating co-authors with Fröhlich include:

  • Justin Riddle
  • Sangtae Ahn
  • Mengsen Zhang
  • David R. Rubinow
  • Kristin K. Sellers

Best Publications

  • Endogenous electric fields may guide neocortical network activity.

    Flavio Fröhlich;David A. McCormick

  • Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Modulates Large-Scale Cortical Network Activity by Network Resonance

    Mohsin M. Ali;Kristin K. Sellers;Flavio Fröhlich

  • Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) for addiction medicine: A consensus paper on the present state of the science and the road ahead

    Hamed Ekhtiari;Hosna Tavakoli;Giovanni Addolorato;Chris Baeken

  • Feedback-Controlled Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Reveals a Functional Role of Sleep Spindles in Motor Memory Consolidation.

    Caroline Lustenberger;Michael R. Boyle;Sankaraleengam Alagapan;Juliann M. Mellin

  • Guiding transcranial brain stimulation by EEG/MEG to interact with ongoing brain activity and associated functions: A position paper.

    Gregor Thut;Til Ole Bergmann;Flavio Fröhlich;Surjo R. Soekadar

  • Double-blind, randomized pilot clinical trial targeting alpha oscillations with transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD).

    Morgan L Alexander;Sankaraleengam Alagapan;Courtney E Lugo;Juliann M Mellin

  • Potassium Dynamics in the Epileptic Cortex: New Insights on an Old Topic:

    Flavio Fröhlich;Maxim Bazhenov;Vicente Iragui-Madoz;Terrence J. Sejnowski

  • Functional role of frontal alpha oscillations in creativity

    Caroline Lustenberger;Michael R. Boyle;A. Alban Foulser;Juliann M. Mellin

  • Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop

    Marom Bikson;Andre R. Brunoni;Leigh E. Charvet;Vincent P. Clark

  • Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains alpha oscillations by preferential phase synchronization of fast-spiking cortical neurons to stimulation waveform.

    Wei A. Huang;Iain M. Stitt;Ehsan Negahbani;D. J. Passey

  • Modulation of Cortical Oscillations by Low-Frequency Direct Cortical Stimulation Is State-Dependent

    Sankaraleengam Alagapan;Stephen L. Schmidt;Jérémie Lefebvre;Eldad Hadar

  • MIN1PIPE: A Miniscope 1-photon-based Calcium Imaging Signal Extraction Pipeline

    Jinghao Lu;Chunyuan Li;Jonnathan Singh-Alvarado;Zhe Charles Zhou

  • Low-Intensity Transcranial Current Stimulation in Psychiatry

    Noah S. Philip;Brent G. Nelson;Flavio Frohlich;Kelvin O. Lim

  • Targeting reduced neural oscillations in patients with schizophrenia by transcranial alternating current stimulation.

    Sangtae Ahn;Juliann M. Mellin;Sankaraleengam Alagapan;Morgan L. Alexander

  • Endogenous Cortical Oscillations Constrain Neuromodulation by Weak Electric Fields

    Stephen L. Schmidt;Apoorva K. Iyengar;A. Alban Foulser;Michael R. Boyle

  • Experiments and models of cortical oscillations as a target for noninvasive brain stimulation.

    Flavio Fröhlich

  • Slow state transitions of sustained neural oscillations by activity-dependent modulation of intrinsic excitability.

    Flavio Fröhlich;Maxim Bazhenov;Igor Timofeev;Mircea Steriade

  • Network Bistability Mediates Spontaneous Transitions between Normal and Pathological Brain States

    Flavio Fröhlich;Terrence J. Sejnowski;Terrence J. Sejnowski;Maxim Bazhenov;Maxim Bazhenov

  • Identifying and Engaging Neuronal Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study.

    Sangtae Ahn;Julianna H. Prim;Morgan L. Alexander;Karen L. McCulloch

  • Coexistence of tonic firing and bursting in cortical neurons.

    Flavio Fröhlich;Maxim Bazhenov

  • Pathological Effect of Homeostatic Synaptic Scaling on Network Dynamics in Diseases of the Cortex

    Flavio Fröhlich;Maxim Bazhenov;Maxim Bazhenov;Terrence J. Sejnowski;Terrence J. Sejnowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Terrence J. Sejnowski
Terrence J. Sejnowski Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Maxim Bazhenov
Maxim Bazhenov University of California, San Diego
David R. Rubinow
David R. Rubinow University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Igor Timofeev
Igor Timofeev Université Laval
John B. Buse
John B. Buse University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Christoph Herrmann
Christoph Herrmann Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Michael Wibral
Michael Wibral University of Göttingen
Kaspar Schindler
Kaspar Schindler University of Bern
Susan S. Girdler
Susan S. Girdler University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Angel V. Peterchev
Angel V. Peterchev Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Flavio Fröhlich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles