World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
5959
World Ranking
12057
National Ranking
4913

Mark Stamp publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Stamp sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 215 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mark Stamp D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Stamp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Stamp is affiliated with San Jose State University in the United States and operates primarily within the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their research covers several specialized topics, including:

  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Digital Media Forensic Detection

Mark Stamp has published both research papers and books, contributing to journals and scientific literature with a focus on malware classification, network security, and machine learning applications in cybersecurity.

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Convolutional neural networks and extreme learning machines for malware classification," 2020, Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques
  • "Darknet traffic classification and adversarial attacks using machine learning," 2023, Computers & Security
  • "Malware classification with Word2Vec, HMM2Vec, BERT, and ELMo," 2022, Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques
  • "Convolutional neural networks for image spam detection," 2020, Information Security Journal A Global Perspective
  • "Generative adversarial networks and image-based malware classification," 2023, Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques

Their frequent coauthors include Fabio Di Troia, Martin Jureček, Han-Chih Chang, Olha Jurečková, and Katerina Potika, with collaboration counts ranging from 4 to 28 joint publications.

Mark Stamp has contributed extensively to several publication venues, particularly arXiv (Cornell University) with 52 publications and the Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques with 11 publications, among other venues such as Computers & Security, Information Security Journal A Global Perspective, and Computers in Biology and Medicine.

In addition to journal articles, Mark Stamp has authored books, including "Artificial Intelligence for Cybersecurity," published by Springer Nature in 2022.

Best Publications

  • A comparison of static, dynamic, and hybrid analysis for malware detection

    Anusha Damodaran;Fabio Di Troia;Corrado Aaron Visaggio;Thomas H. Austin

  • Hunting for Metamorphic Engines

    Wing Wong;Mark Stamp

  • An algorithm for the k-error linear complexity of binary sequences with period 2/sup n/

    M. Stamp;C.F. Martin

  • A Revealing Introduction to Hidden Markov Models

    Mark Stamp

  • Handbook of Information and Communication Security

    Peter Stavroulakis;Mark Stamp

  • Opcode graph similarity and metamorphic detection

    Neha Runwal;Richard M. Low;Mark Stamp

  • Structural entropy and metamorphic malware

    Donabelle Baysa;Richard M. Low;Mark Stamp

  • Hidden Markov models for malware classification

    Chinmayee Annachhatre;Thomas H. Austin;Mark Stamp

  • Profile hidden Markov models and metamorphic virus detection

    Srilatha Attaluri;Scott McGhee;Mark Stamp

  • Hunting for undetectable metamorphic viruses

    Da Lin;Mark Stamp

  • Applied Cryptanalysis: Breaking Ciphers in the Real World

    Mark Stamp;Richard M. Low

  • Introduction to Machine Learning with Applications in Information Security

    Mark Stamp

  • Deriving common malware behavior through graph clustering

    Younghee Park;Douglas S. Reeves;Mark Stamp

  • Chi-squared distance and metamorphic virus detection

    Annie H. Toderici;Mark Stamp

  • Exploring Hidden Markov Models for Virus Analysis: A Semantic Approach

    T. H. Austin;E. Filiol;S. Josse;M. Stamp

  • Risks of monoculture

    Mark Stamp

  • Metamorphic worm that carries its own morphing engine

    Sudarshan Madenur Sridhara;Mark Stamp

  • Simple substitution distance and metamorphic detection

    Gayathri Shanmugam;Richard M. Low;Mark Stamp

  • Feature analysis of encrypted malicious traffic

    Anish Singh Shekhawat;Fabio Di Troia;Mark Stamp

  • Transfer Learning for Image-Based Malware Classification

    Niket Bhodia;Pratikkumar Prajapati;Fabio Di Troia;Mark Stamp

  • Detecting Malware Evolution Using Support Vector Machines

    Mayuri Wadkar;Fabio Di Troia;Mark Stamp

  • Deep learning versus gist descriptors for image-based malware classification

    Sravani Yajamanam;Vikash Raja Samuel Selvin;Fabio Di Troia;Mark Stamp

Frequent Co-Authors

Corrado Aaron Visaggio
Corrado Aaron Visaggio University of Sannio
Mamoun Alazab
Mamoun Alazab Charles Darwin University
Cormac Flanagan
Cormac Flanagan University of California, Santa Cruz
Douglas S. Reeves
Douglas S. Reeves North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a range of related degrees and career options. For those interested in deep theory, an online theoretical physics degree can complement computer science, especially in fields like quantum computing and data modeling.

Data-driven careers are growing quickly. If affordability is key, consider the cheapest data science degree programs. These degrees offer critical skills for handling big data, statistics, and machine learning at a lower tuition cost.

Interested in hardware or systems? An online bachelor’s in electrical engineering can lead to careers in robotics, telecommunications, or embedded systems—all closely connected to computer science.

If you want fast-track options, look into easy certifications that pay well. These can help you boost your credentials and land high-paying tech jobs, even without a four-year degree.

Exploring different online degrees and certifications can help you tailor your career pathway and maximize your opportunities in the ever-evolving tech field.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Stamp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles